![]() |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Drives: 2012 Camaro SS M/T Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 14
|
Top mount TT kit Vs. lower TT kit
Which kit will spool fast and keep the boost between shifts ?
I have now AGP tt kit with 56/61 BW on my 2012 Camaro ss M/T , they spool at 5000 rpm and I have lag between shifts ... Is the top mount kit will be better ? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: it changes Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 1,128
|
top or bottom will make no difference.
Sounds like there is a problem with your install, not with the design. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
After you find and correct your issue with your system I would install something like this to help you with boost in between shifts http://www.npcompleteperformance.com/wotbox
__________________
Cai intake and a few other mods😎
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2006 Z06 Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 5,712
|
Bottom mount spools faster in my experience. You have something wrong that you need to fix.
Turbo size and A/R on housings, along with downpipe size/etc have big effects on lag, but those turbos should be fully spooled and going crazy by ~3k, not 5k. Even the biggest turbos they offer are not that laggy. Huge boost leak, didn't put the wastegate fire rings in, boost controller plumbed wrong, etc.
__________________
Nick
Corvette Z06 -1200ish rwhp Last edited by Unreal; 09-16-2016 at 06:28 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: All things Turbocharged Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,199
|
Something wrong with your install. Should be spooled even on a stock engine before 4000. After you fix that if it's still not fast enough then you can go smaller turbos and/or ballbearing turbos. The turbo you have now are 1100+whp turbos and might just be too big for you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() ![]() |
I have the cast wheel turbos and these things just after 2000 RPM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Drives: 2012 Camaro SS M/T Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 14
|
It makes 900+ on dyno ... no issues .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() ![]() |
You want a faster spooling time, I want more power. Let's trade lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: All things Turbocharged Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,199
|
Seems like the waste gates are starting to open too early then so it's slowly sliding up to full boost. More spring in the gates and/or change the boost control set-up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 ZL1 Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Orlando
Posts: 936
|
Mine makes right around the same power and is at full boost by 32-3600 rpm.
__________________
2013 A6 ZL1
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Served USN - Atomic Chimp
Drives: 2021 Camaro ZL1 1LE A10 (stock) Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 1,713
|
I have the same setup. They can start to spool 2,500rpm and climb rapidly with the right spring pressure set for the wastegates on the weakazz boost controller I have. If I'm at 3,500rpm and punch it they quickly hit fully boost. Sumthin' ain't right with your setup.
__________________
>
> 2021 Camaro ZL1 1LE A10 > > Past Builds: 2013 Twin-Turbo LSX434 M6 - 1,359rwhp daily |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: it changes Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 1,128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Drives: Twin Turbo SS Join Date: May 2010
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Posts: 195
|
Quote:
Team Hellion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2006 Z06 Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 5,712
|
Either way, the turbo size/ar/etc are going to have much much much larger effects. Difference between top and bottom is probably not noticeable.
This guy has an issue, he needs to fix it.
__________________
Nick
Corvette Z06 -1200ish rwhp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|