![]() |
|
|
#603 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 3,273
|
Very interesting thread....I know it's a bit old, but thought it might be worth reviving. Early in the thread, everyone said there were NO cats that could handle our 6.2L with a blower. Have things changed since then?
These Dynatech hi-flows are supposed to be designed for FI applications: http://www.afcodynapro.com/store?sea...text=715-74120 I bought regular hi-flow cats with my headers (not the ones above) and I recently replaced them with midpipes after reading about all the potential problems running cats with FI. Personally, I think the car sounds amazing now, and idle is even better. In certain situations, it's a little loud in the cabin for my taste. Not sure if it's drone or just the engine noise, but it's a very deep bass sound. Sometimes it's just slightly annoying, but nothing major. Also, according to DIC, my mileage went up by a couple MPGs. I'm debating whether I should try the Powercats Plus My only real complaint is I'd like to tone down the sound, just a bit. Otherwise, the car is great with the midpipes. Heck, I even like the smell better. I just bought the midpipes, which weren't exactly cheap, so it'd suck to blow even more money.Mods include Maggie, Livernois 2C cam, Dynatech headers, CAI and some other goodies. I'm right around 600rwhp.
__________________
Last edited by E.T.; 08-05-2015 at 09:47 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#604 |
![]() Drives: 2010 2SS/Black Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 608
|
Living in AZ I purchased a phenolic spacer that insulates the blower from the motor. The temperature is over 100 degrees and my radiator temp stays consistent at 194 degrees at idle and driving. No issues so far but this cat thing is worrisome. I’ll measure the blower temp the next time I drive it for a while.
__________________
2010 Black 2SS L99
Mods: * CAI Intake * Magnuson MP2300 TVS Supercharger/RDS Spacer * Vector Motorsports Tune * Stainless Power LT/Hi Flow Cats/Tru X-* Pipe/36" J-Pipes/40 Series * R1 Concepts ceramic pads and slotted/drilled rotors |
|
|
|
|
|
#605 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 3,273
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#606 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 2SS/RS Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,595
|
I am in the same boat I currently am running JBA High Flows with my turbo kit as of now so far so good, but was curious how loud and annoying deleting the cats are? Plus im in Cali. What kind of piping are u running in place of the cats?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#607 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 3,273
|
Quote:
I think part of the problem is, the midpipes are right under the cabin, so maybe that's why the noise is a problem. It's not terrible by any means, especially with the windows up, but it's just a bit much for my taste. When I had cats, I never had this problem.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#608 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 2SS/RS Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,595
|
R u running their headers? I'm running OEM exhaust manifolds he said they sell a universal one?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#609 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH
Posts: 3,273
|
Yep, I have their SuperMaxx headers.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#610 |
![]() Drives: 16 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: AZ
Posts: 224
|
Older thread, even older response but one of the best pro/con discussions Ive come across.
Last edited by DisturbedSS; 10-31-2016 at 08:00 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#611 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 2SS/RS Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: U.S.A.
Posts: 1,595
|
I removed my JBA high flows in August for JBA catless pipes and my high flows were fine as I am running a turbo. I actually loved the sound of the high flows and was disappointed in the raspy sound of the catless. I have bought a resonated xpipe to quiet it down, so we'll see. I know it's in the best interest of the turbo to run them. I have debated going back to my high flows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#612 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2006 Z06 Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 5,712
|
Quote:
__________________
Nick
Corvette Z06 -1200ish rwhp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#613 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2006 Z06 Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 5,712
|
Talk to CPR, or an actual good tuner.
There is no visual inspection in Arizona There is no cutting or modification to put in long tubes There is no need for a retune to put cats/stock parts back on Replacing a header in a FI engine bay is <3 hour job start to finish Dealer would probably never notice, and not care By the same reasoning a catchcan is illegal, or a tune if you want to get into the details. Tampering with the tune or modifying the PCV system is just as illegal as no cats but seems your willing to do that. As for 30hp and who is going to notice or need that? That is a pretty lame argument. Everyones goals and power needs are different. If you are just going for 550hp then sure, keep the stock stuff. It can last for a bit, but when you goto an event like No Fly Zone, and have one of the slowest cars there, you will want that extra 30rwhp pretty quickly.
__________________
Nick
Corvette Z06 -1200ish rwhp |
|
|
|
|
|
#614 |
|
Drives: 1999 Trans Am Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Bridgewater,Ma
Posts: 2,018
|
So far I've only seen 3 blowns motors personally at the shop due to messed up cats, about 5-6 cars that lost 100+hp with the cats pushing,caught them early enough before damage.
Most state laws make it illegal to even move cats and even illegal to even change mufflers. Most people that mod here can care less about the cat, no-cat topic. In my state ( Ma) the testing is tough but they pass non- catted cars. |
|
|
|
|
|
#615 | |
![]() Drives: 16 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: AZ
Posts: 224
|
Quote:
Also 1 7/8 or 2 inch. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#616 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2018 Charger SRT 392 F8 Green Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oakville Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,910
|
I ran kook's high flow cats with LT's on a maggie'd LS3 for about a year before I went cat-less. The cats were is great shape when I took them off. I was running about 9lbs of boost and was to 650 rwhp. I had to get dyno tuned again but I also installed larger injectors at the same time.
Is it worth it? That's up to you in the end. I think it's worth it. You have to have a good sounding exhaust with a Camaro. JMHO. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SLP Headers / High Flow Cats (CHECK ENG LIGHT ON) HELP | LENN2010Z28 | Tuning / Diagnostics -- engine and transmission | 10 | 01-23-2012 06:55 PM |
| Question about JBA High Flow Cats fitment with Flowmaster American Thunder Catback | TCAT | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 5 | 11-06-2011 03:04 PM |
| Those with LT's, RESET your check engine light! | TAG UR IT | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 107 | 08-18-2010 02:51 AM |
| Thew check engine light... need help!! | Spiffyguitar | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 7 | 08-10-2010 03:26 AM |
| Dynojet results for intake, headers, exhaust with SOLO hiflow cats! | topgun1 | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 17 | 07-02-2010 07:52 AM |