![]() |
|
|
#57 |
![]() Drives: 2010 Victory Red Camaro Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sacramento California
Posts: 283
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 |
|
Mauricio
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS/RS - Black! Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Antonio ,Texas
Posts: 455
|
Dont decrease the weight... just increase the power!
__________________
6000, Delivered to the customer
(10-22-09) |
|
|
|
|
#59 |
![]() ![]() Drives: Impala Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa.
Posts: 813
|
I suggest you drive it before knocking it. If it doesn't suit you when all's said and done, buy a used Vette. you might as well, because thats about the price you are going to pay to buy the car plus make the alterations. Losing weight costs money. Had GM done it on their own it would have priced the car out of the range of 80% of the people on this website. I understand your dilemma, but this isn't a sportscar. The main objective of the Camaro was to put affordable speed and good looks in the hands of the common man, not to blow the non-existing doors off an Ariel Atom at the track.
__________________
Proud Owner of #168 ![]() |
|
|
|
|
#60 |
|
Dances With Mustangs
|
Okay you say your goal is to have a stylish vehicle with a "decent" power to weight ratio. What do you consider decent? And what is your intended purpose for this? HPDE? Autocross? 1/4 mile?
There's many things you can do to reduce weight but it depends on what you want as a final result and what for; generic terms for goals are not useful to us. Give us specifics and I/we can start to tell you what to do for mods. I have a 1SS/RS and I can tell you the car is NOT a pig; not in any way, shape or form. No picture does it justice; no amount of "imagining" how it will be equals the actual experience. This car is special in a way I don't think I've ever experienced in any car I've owned and I've owned MANY over the past few decades; all the way from British sports cars to muscle cars (including a 69 Camaro), to Japanese sports cars, to off-road, on-road whatever. And I've driven everything from a Ferrari to a truck. There's something about this car that makes it more than the sum of it's parts. Drive one first before you judge it. Sounds like you have the money to do mods so I'd recommend renting one for a couple days before you decide to get one. Then we can talk mods.
__________________
Blue Angel is here!! ![]() 1SS/RS LS3 M6 IBM |
|
|
|
|
#61 | |
|
Account Suspended
|
Quote:
As to answer your questions; IRS, 400 hp, and 4 seats- 2003-2004 Mustang Cobra. It was "rated" at 390 hp, and weighed around 3600 lbs. Just like the LS1, the Cobra was also making more than its advertised hp rating. Everyone is caught up on the "pig" word for some reason. Look, the car's heavy, period. Any way you slice it, a mid-sized car shouldn't weigh 3900 lbs, and besides, I'm not here to debate the car being heavy. I am here to find out what I need to remove so I can go out, buy a Camaro, and be happy with it. I want a new Camaro. I DON'T want a Buick Roadmaster. That's all great that you all love the 5th Generation Camaro, but I don't think anybody was happy about it being as heavy as it is. You all act like you're afraid of offending someone by saying it's a heavy car. I'm not even going to ask, "Why is the 5th Generation Camaro 450 lbs heavier than my 1994 Camaro?" So, that being said, let's get down to business. I believe FBodFather is Scott Settlemire, correct? If this is the case, I'll go straight to the source. Scott, what are the 450 lbs of extra weight that I don't need? The only things I'm not willing to sacrifice are safety, a/c, or radio. |
|
|
|
|
|
#62 | |
|
Account Suspended
|
Quote:
This car will mainly be a weekend toy, so I don't mind going with a base model or skimping on options. I plan on taking it out on back roads, and probably taking it to some shows. Some people own Miatas as toys. I want a Camaro. I'm not above going out and buying a Mustang GT with a Track Pack, and if that's what I have to do, then I guess that's what I'll have to do, but I want a Camaro. I'm tired of hearing, "Oh, the Mustang's slow, and the Camaro's faster. The Mustang has a live-axle suspension, the Camaro has an IRS. Blah blah blah." Yeah, that's all great. I've heard it all before, and it's a broken record, but I've driven them both; a Mustang and a Camaro, and the Mustang feels much lighter on its feet than the Camaro. I want a Camaro that feels nearly as light on its feet, and I have no problems with removing things to get that. |
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
Guest
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 4,812
|
In this day an age cars are heavy. They have to be do to all the safety tuff and tec tuff inside. I think the other members on here that are making more power and improving the handling are on the right track. Most people don't want a stripped out full blow race car which is what you would have to do to lose that much wieght. A supercharger would go a long way to changing your mind about the car being a pig.
I do know where your coming from through because I had a 1979 chrysler 300 that everyone called a boat that wieghed less than this car does. |
|
|
|
|
#64 |
|
THR 2SS/RS Supercharged
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 | |
|
Account Suspended
|
Quote:
While I don't exactly want a stripped out, full-blown race car, I don't mind giving up some sound deadening or going with a fiberglass hood, smaller wheels, etc. I'm used to driving two cars that weigh about 3400-3500 lbs each, and I guess that's what I'm comfortable with. I dunno, it's like having weight limits for dating, but only this time, I'd be "marrying" into it. My "magic number" has always been 3400 lbs. ![]() John, what is your opinion of your new SS on back roads? Are you going to be driving it to the meet on September 26th? |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 | |
|
Guest
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 4,812
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
![]() |
I am not sure, but asking for help with lowering the weight of the Camaro by calling it " a pig of a car" is the best way to get real help from those of us who love the Camaro. Although the Camaro may be wider / heavy than some competitors it is definetly no pig, see the Challenger. If you want lighter maybe you should test drive the Miata, Nissan 370Z or Honda S2000. Those might fit your needs better since it seems you are in search of a sports cars not a muscle car. At least that is MHO!
|
|
|
|
|
#68 | |
|
Account Suspended
|
Quote:
All in all, I want the car with the most potential. If that means that I have to settle for a Mustang with the "Roushcharger" to get what I want, I will do that. Do I prefer to? I do not. I want a Camaro, but I want a Camaro I can be happy with. What will make me happy is a domestic Muscle Car that weighs no more than 3500 lbs, makes over 400 hp, and costs under $35,000. I don't care who makes it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#69 | |
|
Account Suspended
|
Quote:
![]() What I want is a powerful domestic Muscle Car that not only looks cool cruising Main Street USA, but performs as cool as it looks. That means it accelerates AND handles. |
|
|
|
|
|
#70 | |
|
Guest
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 4,812
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Lose Fat, Save Gasoline | KILLER74Z28 | Off-topic Discussions | 10 | 07-31-2010 11:40 AM |
| Fat tires | Dabluzdude | Wheels and Tires Talk Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 10 | 07-22-2009 02:27 AM |
| Fat Meat | Hooy | Wheels and Tires Talk Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 26 | 02-28-2009 10:21 PM |