Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
KPM Fuel Systems
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-18-2009, 12:53 AM   #57
jayson71
 
Drives: 2010 Victory Red Camaro
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sacramento California
Posts: 283
Quote:
Originally Posted by Revo1 View Post
x1000
Quote:
Originally Posted by talwell View Post
The Mustang might be lighter - but I will push a Camaro before I drive a Mustang.
jayson71 is offline  
Old 09-18-2009, 03:50 AM   #58
Blackend SS
Mauricio
 
Blackend SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS/RS - Black!
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Antonio ,Texas
Posts: 455
Dont decrease the weight... just increase the power!
__________________
6000, Delivered to the customer(10-22-09)
Blackend SS is offline  
Old 09-18-2009, 03:58 AM   #59
AngryAmish

 
AngryAmish's Avatar
 
Drives: Impala
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa.
Posts: 813
I suggest you drive it before knocking it. If it doesn't suit you when all's said and done, buy a used Vette. you might as well, because thats about the price you are going to pay to buy the car plus make the alterations. Losing weight costs money. Had GM done it on their own it would have priced the car out of the range of 80% of the people on this website. I understand your dilemma, but this isn't a sportscar. The main objective of the Camaro was to put affordable speed and good looks in the hands of the common man, not to blow the non-existing doors off an Ariel Atom at the track.
__________________
Proud Owner of #168
AngryAmish is offline  
Old 09-18-2009, 04:15 AM   #60
Doc
Dances With Mustangs
 
Doc's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 1SS/RS MT
Join Date: May 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 3,819
Okay you say your goal is to have a stylish vehicle with a "decent" power to weight ratio. What do you consider decent? And what is your intended purpose for this? HPDE? Autocross? 1/4 mile?

There's many things you can do to reduce weight but it depends on what you want as a final result and what for; generic terms for goals are not useful to us. Give us specifics and I/we can start to tell you what to do for mods.

I have a 1SS/RS and I can tell you the car is NOT a pig; not in any way, shape or form. No picture does it justice; no amount of "imagining" how it will be equals the actual experience. This car is special in a way I don't think I've ever experienced in any car I've owned and I've owned MANY over the past few decades; all the way from British sports cars to muscle cars (including a 69 Camaro), to Japanese sports cars, to off-road, on-road whatever. And I've driven everything from a Ferrari to a truck.

There's something about this car that makes it more than the sum of it's parts. Drive one first before you judge it. Sounds like you have the money to do mods so I'd recommend renting one for a couple days before you decide to get one. Then we can talk mods.
__________________

Blue Angel is here!!
1SS/RS LS3 M6 IBM
Doc is offline  
Old 09-18-2009, 04:26 AM   #61
deletedd
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 1994 Chevrolet B4C Camaro
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kearneysville, WV
Posts: 23
Send a message via AIM to deletedd Send a message via Yahoo to deletedd
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragoneye View Post
Disclaimer is this:

I do not intend to offend or harrang you in any way.

Now, though...I would like you to answer a few questions for me.

#1. Have you driven the car, yet?
#2. What do you mean by functional?
and #3....is not a question;

I challenge you to find a new sports car on the PLANET...that has the following:

IRS
400+hp
4 seats
and DOESN'T weigh somewhere between 3700-4200lbs.

I think you'll find that you cannot. For the price range? The Camaro actually comes out on the lighter-side of the spectrum. If you can beat that challenge, then you can call it a pig and fat all you like, otherwise, it is an inaccurate statement to make.
Ok, everyone is telling me, "Drive one, drive one." I have driven one. It's a nice car, but I'm the kinda person who likes to take it to the back roads, too. IMO, it just felt heavy, and it is heavy. I want more out of a car than to drive it in a straight line down Main Street and look "cool." 3900 lbs isn't going to get me around a corner very efficiently, is it? I think not.

As to answer your questions; IRS, 400 hp, and 4 seats- 2003-2004 Mustang Cobra. It was "rated" at 390 hp, and weighed around 3600 lbs. Just like the LS1, the Cobra was also making more than its advertised hp rating.

Everyone is caught up on the "pig" word for some reason. Look, the car's heavy, period. Any way you slice it, a mid-sized car shouldn't weigh 3900 lbs, and besides, I'm not here to debate the car being heavy. I am here to find out what I need to remove so I can go out, buy a Camaro, and be happy with it. I want a new Camaro. I DON'T want a Buick Roadmaster.

That's all great that you all love the 5th Generation Camaro, but I don't think anybody was happy about it being as heavy as it is. You all act like you're afraid of offending someone by saying it's a heavy car. I'm not even going to ask, "Why is the 5th Generation Camaro 450 lbs heavier than my 1994 Camaro?"

So, that being said, let's get down to business. I believe FBodFather is Scott Settlemire, correct? If this is the case, I'll go straight to the source. Scott, what are the 450 lbs of extra weight that I don't need? The only things I'm not willing to sacrifice are safety, a/c, or radio.
deletedd is offline  
Old 09-18-2009, 04:36 AM   #62
deletedd
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 1994 Chevrolet B4C Camaro
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kearneysville, WV
Posts: 23
Send a message via AIM to deletedd Send a message via Yahoo to deletedd
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doc View Post
Okay you say your goal is to have a stylish vehicle with a "decent" power to weight ratio. What do you consider decent? And what is your intended purpose for this? HPDE? Autocross? 1/4 mile?

There's many things you can do to reduce weight but it depends on what you want as a final result and what for; generic terms for goals are not useful to us. Give us specifics and I/we can start to tell you what to do for mods.

I have a 1SS/RS and I can tell you the car is NOT a pig; not in any way, shape or form. No picture does it justice; no amount of "imagining" how it will be equals the actual experience. This car is special in a way I don't think I've ever experienced in any car I've owned and I've owned MANY over the past few decades; all the way from British sports cars to muscle cars (including a 69 Camaro), to Japanese sports cars, to off-road, on-road whatever. And I've driven everything from a Ferrari to a truck.

There's something about this car that makes it more than the sum of it's parts. Drive one first before you judge it. Sounds like you have the money to do mods so I'd recommend renting one for a couple days before you decide to get one. Then we can talk mods.
I don't plan on autocrossing the car, and I don't plan on drag-racing it. The car will probably hardly ever see the light of day on the track. I simply like a vehicle with a reasonable power/weight ratio because I like the feeling of a car that is light on its feet. I'm not looking for this Camaro to feel like an STi. I'm looking for a car where I can leave the mechanics UNMODIFIED, and have excellent performance. My basic goal is to have the "Ultimate Camaro." The Camaro's a good car, but IMO, its weight keeps it from being great. It has the hardware; the power, IRS, big brakes. It doesn't have the moves.

This car will mainly be a weekend toy, so I don't mind going with a base model or skimping on options. I plan on taking it out on back roads, and probably taking it to some shows. Some people own Miatas as toys. I want a Camaro.

I'm not above going out and buying a Mustang GT with a Track Pack, and if that's what I have to do, then I guess that's what I'll have to do, but I want a Camaro. I'm tired of hearing, "Oh, the Mustang's slow, and the Camaro's faster. The Mustang has a live-axle suspension, the Camaro has an IRS. Blah blah blah." Yeah, that's all great. I've heard it all before, and it's a broken record, but I've driven them both; a Mustang and a Camaro, and the Mustang feels much lighter on its feet than the Camaro. I want a Camaro that feels nearly as light on its feet, and I have no problems with removing things to get that.
deletedd is offline  
Old 09-18-2009, 08:56 AM   #63
coolman
Guest
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 4,812
In this day an age cars are heavy. They have to be do to all the safety tuff and tec tuff inside. I think the other members on here that are making more power and improving the handling are on the right track. Most people don't want a stripped out full blow race car which is what you would have to do to lose that much wieght. A supercharger would go a long way to changing your mind about the car being a pig.

I do know where your coming from through because I had a 1979 chrysler 300 that everyone called a boat that wieghed less than this car does.
coolman is offline  
Old 09-18-2009, 08:57 AM   #64
jmcbeth
THR 2SS/RS Supercharged
 
Drives: 1st and 5th Gen Camaros
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 468
Quote:
Originally Posted by onechuck View Post
You never would know it was this big if you weren't told. You can't feel it any way.
+1
jmcbeth is offline  
Old 09-18-2009, 09:12 AM   #65
deletedd
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 1994 Chevrolet B4C Camaro
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kearneysville, WV
Posts: 23
Send a message via AIM to deletedd Send a message via Yahoo to deletedd
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolman View Post
In this day an age cars are heavy. They have to be do to all the safety tuff and tec tuff inside. I think the other members on here that are making more power and improving the handling are on the right track. Most people don't want a stripped out full blow race car which is what you would have to do to lose that much wieght. A supercharger would go a long way to changing your mind about the car being a pig.

I do know where your coming from through because I had a 1979 chrysler 300 that everyone called a boat that wieghed less than this car does.
I dunno, guys. I'm pulling my hair out over this one. While I don't exactly want a stripped out, full-blown race car, I don't mind giving up some sound deadening or going with a fiberglass hood, smaller wheels, etc. I'm used to driving two cars that weigh about 3400-3500 lbs each, and I guess that's what I'm comfortable with. I dunno, it's like having weight limits for dating, but only this time, I'd be "marrying" into it. My "magic number" has always been 3400 lbs.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jmcbeth View Post

+1
John, what is your opinion of your new SS on back roads? Are you going to be driving it to the meet on September 26th?
deletedd is offline  
Old 09-18-2009, 09:23 AM   #66
coolman
Guest
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 4,812
Quote:
Originally Posted by RatedZ View Post
I dunno, guys. I'm pulling my hair out over this one. While I don't exactly want a stripped out, full-blown race car, I don't mind giving up some sound deadening or going with a fiberglass hood, smaller wheels, etc. I'm used to driving two cars that weigh about 3400-3500 lbs each, and I guess that's what I'm comfortable with. I dunno, it's like having weight limits for dating, but only this time, I'd be "marrying" into it. My "magic number" has always been 3400 lbs.



John, what is your opinion of your new SS on back roads? Are you going to be driving it to the meet on September 26th?
I know how you feel and would like the samething. I have an 87 gta trans am with 75 less hp than my wifes 2010 camaro with the v-6 and it feels way more sports car like. I believe this has to be the wieght differance.
coolman is offline  
Old 09-18-2009, 09:45 AM   #67
gac458
 
Drives: 2010 CGM Camaro
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: League City, Texas
Posts: 101
I am not sure, but asking for help with lowering the weight of the Camaro by calling it " a pig of a car" is the best way to get real help from those of us who love the Camaro. Although the Camaro may be wider / heavy than some competitors it is definetly no pig, see the Challenger. If you want lighter maybe you should test drive the Miata, Nissan 370Z or Honda S2000. Those might fit your needs better since it seems you are in search of a sports cars not a muscle car. At least that is MHO!
gac458 is offline  
Old 09-18-2009, 09:48 AM   #68
deletedd
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 1994 Chevrolet B4C Camaro
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kearneysville, WV
Posts: 23
Send a message via AIM to deletedd Send a message via Yahoo to deletedd
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolman View Post
I know how you feel and would like the samething. I have an 87 gta trans am with 75 less hp than my wifes 2010 camaro with the v-6 and it feels way more sports car like. I believe this has to be the wieght differance.
See, this is where I'm at; the same place you are. My dad has an '89 GTA, and the thing feels large, but I think that's due to the steering rack or tired suspension, or something, but I also find the GTA to feel more sport-like. I like a sporty feeling car.

All in all, I want the car with the most potential. If that means that I have to settle for a Mustang with the "Roushcharger" to get what I want, I will do that. Do I prefer to? I do not. I want a Camaro, but I want a Camaro I can be happy with. What will make me happy is a domestic Muscle Car that weighs no more than 3500 lbs, makes over 400 hp, and costs under $35,000. I don't care who makes it.
deletedd is offline  
Old 09-18-2009, 09:49 AM   #69
deletedd
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 1994 Chevrolet B4C Camaro
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Kearneysville, WV
Posts: 23
Send a message via AIM to deletedd Send a message via Yahoo to deletedd
Quote:
Originally Posted by gac458 View Post
I am not sure, but asking for help with lowering the weight of the Camaro by calling it " a pig of a car" is the best way to get real help from those of us who love the Camaro. Although the Camaro may be wider / heavy than some competitors it is definetly no pig, see the Challenger. If you want lighter maybe you should test drive the Miata, Nissan 370Z or Honda S2000. Those might fit your needs better since it seems you are in search of a sports cars not a muscle car. At least that is MHO!
Well, then don't help.

What I want is a powerful domestic Muscle Car that not only looks cool cruising Main Street USA, but performs as cool as it looks. That means it accelerates AND handles.
deletedd is offline  
Old 09-18-2009, 09:55 AM   #70
coolman
Guest
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 4,812
Quote:
Originally Posted by RatedZ View Post
See, this is where I'm at; the same place you are. My dad has an '89 GTA, and the thing feels large, but I think that's due to the steering rack or tired suspension, or something, but I also find the GTA to feel more sport-like. I like a sporty feeling car.

All in all, I want the car with the most potential. If that means that I have to settle for a Mustang with the "Roushcharger" to get what I want, I will do that. Do I prefer to? I do not. I want a Camaro, but I want a Camaro I can be happy with. What will make me happy is a domestic Muscle Car that weighs no more than 3500 lbs, makes over 400 hp, and costs under $35,000. I don't care who makes it.
I thought you were an all out chevy guy ,but what you just said changes things. I had a 2010 gt500 and sold it to get a camaro because I was stuck on the looks. But the mustang Is a better handling car by far. Stick with the regular gt and add the supercharger over othe gt500 because the gt500 is also heavy. I'm thinking about doing the sameting because you can also get some good deals on mustang gt's right now. They also have a nicer interior.
coolman is offline  
 
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lose Fat, Save Gasoline KILLER74Z28 Off-topic Discussions 10 07-31-2010 11:40 AM
Fat tires Dabluzdude Wheels and Tires Talk Sponsored by The Tire Rack 10 07-22-2009 02:27 AM
Fat Meat Hooy Wheels and Tires Talk Sponsored by The Tire Rack 26 02-28-2009 10:21 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.