![]() |
|
|
#43 |
![]() |
Two very different cars, I went for the V6 in the Camaro (305HP 29 MPG)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I doubt it... but that's why they have the races. Many mod's since these videos though... what's your 1/8 mile time (haven't hit a 1/4 mile track yet myself)? I'm running 8.2's with a bit more room to improve left to go... and that's in the automatic L99.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
NOICE!!! ™
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 Challenger SRT8 Auto Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 839
|
Ok folks, the thread is turning into a "I'm faster than you" pissing match and since I have no intention of street racing I am not basing my decision on "my d%^k is bigger than yours" rhetoric, no offense.
As an aside, stopped at another dealer this morning and if the Supplier Pricing and favorable financing terms come through I may be pulling the trigger today on a 2SS.... |
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | |
|
5Th Gen (Craig)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
aka 'ACE"
|
I test drove the Chally and it does have a bigger back seat but there was no beating the deal and the price that I paid for the Camaro. I have two kids 7 and 2 so the mini backseat is ok for now. I really like both cars but for me ithe camaros' redesigned style brought it back to its glory days but at the same time made it different. Were the chally is basically the same. Mine is a manual and even in LA traffic I'm comfortable with it. Once you ride the bike you never forget.
I wish you the best of luck with your decision. By the way I test drove the Chally and never actually did sit in or drive a camaro. It was love at first sight. ever since the LA car show in 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 2SS/RJT/L99 Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 1,151
|
I drove the CHallenger R/T and SRT8, and really, really wanted to love it....but in the end both were just too fat. Loved the design, interior space, but could not get over how porky they felt. Very, very disappointing. Steering was totally numb.
Bought a 2SS and am very happy!
__________________
2SS/RJT/L99
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 Challenger SRT8 Auto Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 839
|
Not a hard decision until you have to contend with your MOPAR man father who has HEMI Orange running through his veins..... I think if I roll up in the Inferno Oragne he may just disown me but with the 10k I save I'll take him to a few NHRA events and NASCAR races and he'll put me back in his will....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#51 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 2SS/RJT/L99 Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Springfield, MO
Posts: 1,151
|
Quote:
__________________
2SS/RJT/L99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#52 | |
![]() Drives: '07 SRT8 SuperBee, '09 GT500 Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 684
|
Quote:
If you don't have alot of space requirements, or are looking for a fast second car to mod and enjoy, the Camaro makes alot is sense and is a good choice. If you are looking for a collectible car, The SRT8 has a greater chance of being unique and collectible based on low production volume <10K per year.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#53 | |
|
2SS 6M
Drives: 2010 2SS 6M Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Rancho Cucamonga , CA
Posts: 113
|
Quote:
I now own a 2SS Camaro 6 speed manual. It is a 2SS and the only options are Red Jewel tincoat paint and polished wheels. Window sticker was 35,020. As far as I can tell the only things I gave up are the Camaro does not have a sunroof, navigation, HID headlights or a pushbutton start. I cannot say enough about these cars! They are both great cars and anybody that has one would be happy to own it. It's AMAZING how far automobiles and musclecars have come in every respect. My camaro seat insert perforated leather is paper thin and I have some minor concerns about that. Not sure if all models are the same? The Camaro console is smaller and harder to use. The car and so the interior overall is smaller on the Camaro. The Camaro beltline is higher so if you like resting your arm on the door with the window down that may feel awkward ( I am 5'9" so this may not not matter to you). Neither car has "any" room for rear seat occupants legs if you front seat is back very far. So if you throw a kid back there you will have to put your seat forward. Common sense tells me the challenger may have a slight edge here. The Challenger trunk is much larger and easier to use. I tried to put a leaf spring off my Valiant that was 55" long in the Camaro trunk and it would not go in no matter what, without folding down the rear seat down. 55" is not very long. As far as overall quality I will have to say they are very comparable. They are both very well built Cars. It is unfortunate the general american public does not know this. I don't think I could say one was better than the other. The challenger did use one quart of oil in the first 2500 miles. But in some cases that could be considered normal, so it did not concern me. I would hope that it would get better after more break in? But still not a huge concern. I have always loved GM powertrains and this car is no exception. The Camaro is smoother and quieter. It shifts smoother and the exhaust is quieter. The Camaro has that quiet sound of power where the Challenger literally did not need aftermarket exhaust to make it sound any better. It was pretty loud for stock exhaust and sounded bitchen! I liked both but I am 50 so I am leaning twoards the camaro on the exhaust. I am 100% sure (from my own experience) it does not take loud exhaust to make power. The Camaro has a slight edge on NHV. The Camaro has a little more power, and has more power down low and therefore better drivability. I stalled the Challenger probably 10 times backing in my carport and not once with the Camaro. Neither car will do much nailing the throttle if you are at freeway speed in 6th gear. But the Chevy seems to have a definate advantage here. Either car will accelerate from 700-800 rpm in any gear. So you can literally roll around a 15 mph corner in 3rd gear and it is not a problem. But the chevy will accelerate better and easier. You are right about the 6M VS fun factor. I strongly considered an auto with the chevy since it is a 6spd too. But I stuck with the Manual and I do not regret it one bit. They are not so bad in traffic as long as it is not every day, all day. You could literally use 3rd gear for 10-60 MPH if you wanted. Based on your concerns, I literally could not give you a solid reccomendation of one over the other. Price, the chevy is way better, especially if you do not want all the expensive options. Powertrain longevity, I would have to say goes to the Chevy. I think the Dodge soft trim might have a slight edge. I actually think the Challenger is the best looking. But not by much! I am liking this Camaro more everyday as far as looks. It grows on you. You may have noticed that I am comparing to a SRT8 Challenger. The Chevy Camaro powertrain & Brakes & wheels/tires totally outclasses a Challenger RT. So there is no Comparisin. I guess my final reccomendation is if you can fit in the car and be comfortable in a Camaro and do not put a premium on interior and trunk space then you should get a Camaro. The powertrain (which is the most important) will probably be more reliable and the price is definately better. Tell your Dad that another Die Hard Mopar Guy reccomended the camaro to you! LOL. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#54 |
![]() Drives: 1969 CAMARO 2010 CAMARO Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: BROWNWOOD TEXAS
Posts: 213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#55 |
|
PowerStroke this Ford boy
Drives: Like Don Garlits "Big Daddy" Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Richlands/Camp Lejeune NC
Posts: 462
|
I fought this same battle, I ended up going out of state and getting a fully loaded SRt for 39K. It was a no brainer for me. If I couldnt have gotten that deal then there would be a 2ss in my garage.
__________________
![]() Hey big man let me hold a dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
#56 |
![]() Drives: 1969 CAMARO 2010 CAMARO Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: BROWNWOOD TEXAS
Posts: 213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| V6 Camaro Performance Upgrades | rtcat600man | Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 387 | 09-19-2019 07:53 PM |
| Think about this and the Z28 5th gen | 13F20 | Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics | 41 | 09-04-2010 01:59 AM |
| Some thoughts on "recent" developments on this site.... | fbodfather | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 258 | 05-08-2009 11:24 PM |
| Detroit News panel wants GM to build Camaro concept | Tran | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 12 | 03-15-2009 05:38 PM |
| 4 SEMA CAMAROS finally unveiled by GM! (hi-res images & details) | FenwickHockey65 | Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery | 237 | 11-03-2008 11:39 PM |