![]() |
|
|
#127 |
![]() Drives: Suburban, Impala SS Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Lake Michigan
Posts: 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
#128 |
|
Account Suspended
|
I could deal to shed a few pounds, and I've been working on it. I weigh 223.5 and I'm 5'11. I've been working on losing weight.
What I'd like to know is when the turned into a pissing war, and why. You all need to get over the "pig" comment already. Get a life, really. It's a freakin' car. I'm not attacking your mothers. Get over it. What is this, a forum full of teenie-boppers here? Sorry (not really...) that 75% of you get all butt-hurt when somebody calls your car "overweight." With skin that thin, I wonder how you all make it through daily life. |
|
|
|
|
#129 | |
|
Account Suspended
|
Quote:
Now, quit crying. |
|
|
|
|
|
#130 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2006 Silverado SS, 2009 G8 GT Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: PNW
Posts: 13,313
|
Quote:
There are alot of very passionate people that think of cars as more than just a car. What are you comparing it to that it is "overweight"? |
|
|
|
|
|
#131 |
|
Account Suspended
|
What do you mean, "what am I comparing it to?" It weighs 3900 lbs. I could compare it to a 1966 Impala, a 1971 Caprice, etc. And if they think of their cars as "more than just cars," as in, thinking of them as people, they need their heads checked. I love my Camaro just as much as the next guy, but I'm not going to cry if somebody calls it "heavy" or a "pig."
|
|
|
|
|
#132 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Black Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 1,880
|
Quote:
So it sounds to me like YOU'RE the one crying about the response to your rude comments. |
|
|
|
|
|
#133 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Black Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 1,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
#134 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Black Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 1,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
#135 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2006 Silverado SS, 2009 G8 GT Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: PNW
Posts: 13,313
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#136 | |
|
Account Suspended
|
Quote:
Take the time to read, slick. I own a Camaro. I can say anything I want to about'em, whether you approve of it or otherwise. I earned that right when I bought one. My concerns about the weight of the car is a legitimate one. If you don't like it, get out of the thread, because you surely aren't helping me with the information I'm trying to get. I'm not here to argue with some infantile child that gets all butt-hurt when somebody doesn't kiss his ass about his car. You sound like more of a ricer than any ricer I've ever met. In fact, you're worse than an SRT-4 owner. |
|
|
|
|
|
#137 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2006 Silverado SS, 2009 G8 GT Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: PNW
Posts: 13,313
|
|
|
|
|
|
#138 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NorCal
Posts: 958
|
Amen
Quote:
We get it, the car is heavy and you don't believe there is anything that can be done to fix it. So go away already! Peace out |
|
|
|
|
|
#139 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Dodge Ram Megacab & Cobalt SS Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Boise
Posts: 1,536
|
My honest take on the weight:
GM took a no compromise approach in sticking as close to the concept in appearance as pausible. It worked and the car is stunning for it. However the trick is that the concept had a very low cockpit with extravagantly flaired 'hips'. In order to keep those proportions right and have a car that real people would fit in required a fairly large platform. Large platforms = more weight. It's that simple to me- it's partially new regulations, but really- in order to not compromise on the artistic design component required some compromise on the weight component. I think this was successful. GM saw that you didn't want just a new Camaro, you wanted that concepts design. If you look at the Mustang you can see that the design allowed for a higher greenhouse. So with the higher greenhouse relative to the car, you could have a smaller overall car that people will fit into. So you could probably pretty accurately say that function followed form. You can argue about numbers all day, but really as long as your performance is at least some acceptable level-then it all comes down to design. For instance, numbers aside I'd rather have a Challenger RT than a Mustang because of style. It performs with enough vigor that I can look at the design. I like the Camaros styling even better and the numbers are the dressing on top. The fact cars like the Mustang may handle a little better doesn't make a bit of difference to me as long as the Camaro is competitive. |
|
|
|
|
#140 | |
|
Account Suspended
|
Quote:
You can throw the fanciest suspension on the heaviest of cars, and while it may improve the handling, it's not going to mask the weight of a heavy car. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Lose Fat, Save Gasoline | KILLER74Z28 | Off-topic Discussions | 10 | 07-31-2010 10:40 AM |
| Fat tires | Dabluzdude | Wheels and Tires Talk Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 10 | 07-22-2009 01:27 AM |
| Fat Meat | Hooy | Wheels and Tires Talk Sponsored by The Tire Rack | 26 | 02-28-2009 09:21 PM |