Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-20-2011, 10:23 AM   #211
bmorecam
Account Suspended
 
Drives: jealous vendors mad!! HAHA!!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CYBERGMONSTER@GMAIL.COM
Posts: 3,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by chozn4service View Post
Sounds good! Now not trying to get you to say something that's not, just going by feel or butt dyno, what do you anticipate? I mean if you had to take a S.W.A.G. (scientific Wild Ass Guess) what do you think you might see in this as far as gains go? I know the Butt Dyno is registering something.
All porting is doing is taking the original product and just making it flow better where the cpr6 or the v8's fast manifolds are built from scratch. How much we will gain is all depending on the knowledge and skill of the person that is porting and how much the original manifold was choking. From my experience you usually see about 10-15 on avg and mostly on top of the rpm, and usually there's different stages of porting that a vendor will offer. Usually stg1 thru stg3 which will be the most aggressive porting or removal and usually requiring a tune. I am currently working on the most aggressive stg with tune already lined up. We are expecting 20+. The peoples that I am having my porting done from are anticipating around 25-30 but I think I feel more comfortable saying 20+. Only dyno will tell and I will make it happen.
bmorecam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2011, 10:33 AM   #212
rtcat600man
having FUN now 13.66@101
 
rtcat600man's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2LT IOM
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Clarkston, Michigan
Posts: 9,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmorecam View Post
All porting is doing is taking the original product and just making it flow better where the cpr6 or the v8's fast manifolds are built from scratch. How much we will gain is all depending on the knowledge and skill of the person that is porting and how much the original manifold was choking. From my experience you usually see about 10-15 on avg and mostly on top of the rpm, and usually there's different stages of porting that a vendor will offer. Usually stg1 thru stg3 which will be the most aggressive porting or removal and usually requiring a tune. I am currently working on the most aggressive stg with tune already lined up. We are expecting 20+. The peoples that I am having my porting done from are anticipating around 25-30 but I think I feel more comfortable saying 20+. Only dyno will tell and I will make it happen.


We said it before and it is worth saying again. THANKS for taking this on.

I can't wait to see the results. Is this something you think we can remove our intake and send it to them for the work and then re-install. My Camaro will be in storage all winter and I can see removing this in December and shipping out for the work and reinstalling upon return. Let us know the details (which I know you will) ASAP.

Thanks again.
__________________
rtcat600man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2011, 10:37 AM   #213
chozn4service


 
chozn4service's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 SS w/2SS A8 Blue Velvet
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: 39.793153,-86.238223
Posts: 3,678
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmorecam View Post
All porting is doing is taking the original product and just making it flow better where the cpr6 or the v8's fast manifolds are built from scratch. How much we will gain is all depending on the knowledge and skill of the person that is porting and how much the original manifold was choking. From my experience you usually see about 10-15 on avg and mostly on top of the rpm, and usually there's different stages of porting that a vendor will offer. Usually stg1 thru stg3 which will be the most aggressive porting or removal and usually requiring a tune. I am currently working on the most aggressive stg with tune already lined up. We are expecting 20+. The peoples that I am having my porting done from are anticipating around 25-30 but I think I feel more comfortable saying 20+. Only dyno will tell and I will make it happen.
This all sounds good! So we, those of us without a tune will be required more than likely to get one with this? If that is the case, aside from Trifecta, where would this come into play? I had thought about a tune but didn't get the questions I had for Vince answered to my satisfaction with spending that kind of money. Maybe that'll change but I'm open to what will make the car perform to its fullest potential.
__________________
Never grow up, it's a trap!
chozn4service is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2011, 11:27 AM   #214
3859c1
 
Drives: 1997 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP L67
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Iowa
Posts: 6
Without head porting to match to the intake there will be some turbulence caused by the mismatch. The gains from the porting of the intake manifold may not be seen at their full extent on the dyno without matching to the heads.
3859c1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2011, 11:29 AM   #215
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,967
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3859c1 View Post
Without head porting to match to the intake there will be some turbulence caused by the mismatch. The gains from the porting of the intake manifold may not be seen at their full extent on the dyno without matching to the heads.
Agree with this for sure, but some people (myself included) aren't willing to go the extra mile and port the heads, and so I'm just hoping for some decent gains with this alone.

For the ones that do port the heads...more power to you guys!
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2011, 11:42 AM   #216
3859c1
 
Drives: 1997 Pontiac Grand Prix GTP L67
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Iowa
Posts: 6
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by KMPrenger View Post
Agree with this for sure, but some people (myself included) aren't willing to go the extra mile and port the heads, and so I'm just hoping for some decent gains with this alone.

For the ones that do port the heads...more power to you guys!
The difference in size between an unported, head without gasket matching and the ported/gasket matched intake ports is substantial. If the heads aren't going to be gasket matched, then the intake manifold shouldn't be gasket matched either.
I've looked at the ports of the intake manifold and there is plenty of power to be had without gasket matching. So, a nice port job with some reshaping and enlarging of the inside of the ports and work to the inlet is all you guys will need if your not doing the heads. I think you'll be impressed with the gains!
3859c1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2011, 01:16 PM   #217
bmorecam
Account Suspended
 
Drives: jealous vendors mad!! HAHA!!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CYBERGMONSTER@GMAIL.COM
Posts: 3,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by rtcat600man View Post
We said it before and it is worth saying again. THANKS for taking this on.

I can't wait to see the results. Is this something you think we can remove our intake and send it to them for the work and then re-install. My Camaro will be in storage all winter and I can see removing this in December and shipping out for the work and reinstalling upon return. Let us know the details (which I know you will) ASAP.

Thanks again.
You can definitely take your current one off and send it in or you can do like I did and purchase a new one through GM then send it in. Mine is actually going to be up for sale as soon as I get the porting back. Thanks as always

Quote:
Originally Posted by chozn4service View Post
This all sounds good! So we, those of us without a tune will be required more than likely to get one with this? If that is the case, aside from Trifecta, where would this come into play? I had thought about a tune but didn't get the questions I had for Vince answered to my satisfaction with spending that kind of money. Maybe that'll change but I'm open to what will make the car perform to its fullest potential.
Not necessarily. It all depend what is your ultimate goal and what are you trying to get out of. The guys that I am currently working with I believe will offer different stages of porting. From aggressive to mild. I chose to go full out with tune. Once I get the porting back and do some datalogging along with dyno we should know where the tune will fit



Quote:
Originally Posted by 3859c1 View Post
Without head porting to match to the intake there will be some turbulence caused by the mismatch. The gains from the porting of the intake manifold may not be seen at their full extent on the dyno without matching to the heads.
I plan on doing the whole nine. The heads/exhaust/IM/Headers and even installing a manifold cooler from mace over at aussie. I agree with you that if there's no plans to do the heads then there's no need to gasket match. Like I stated earlier the big gain will come from doing a complete porting and tuned, but we will find out very very soon what the IM will net us which the majority peoples will probably end up going with
bmorecam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2011, 01:26 PM   #218
BaylorCamaro
Track > 1/4 Mile
 
BaylorCamaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 C7 Z51
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 6,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmorecam View Post
Not necessarily. It all depend what is your ultimate goal and what are you trying to get out of. The guys that I am currently working with I believe will offer different stages of porting. From aggressive to mild. I chose to go full out with tune. Once I get the porting back and do some datalogging along with dyno we should know where the tune will fit
Getting tuned by Trifecta right?
BaylorCamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2011, 01:31 PM   #219
bmorecam
Account Suspended
 
Drives: jealous vendors mad!! HAHA!!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CYBERGMONSTER@GMAIL.COM
Posts: 3,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaylorAirForce View Post
Getting tuned by Trifecta right?
Do I have a choice lol?
bmorecam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2011, 01:42 PM   #220
BaylorCamaro
Track > 1/4 Mile
 
BaylorCamaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 C7 Z51
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 6,072
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmorecam View Post
Do I have a choice lol?
Good point, wasn't sure if you were going to have it done locally.
BaylorCamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2011, 09:47 PM   #221
BSR-1

 
BSR-1's Avatar
 
Drives: 17 ZL1 M6 Black
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Capo Beach, Ca
Posts: 1,411
Sure, matching the heads to the manifold is a good Idea but I felt a decent gain with just gasket matching the manifold.
Now that I've matched the heads to the gasket also it seems to have moved the power higher in the rev range. Where it would pull really good from about 4-6 thou with a peak at about 5500 and then drop off to redline it now feels as if it pulls all the way to redline without hitting a peak.

Sorry about the lack of hard dyno #'s but I'm just a poor guy who has an addiction.

I was asked about the tools that I had used so I'll post a few pics.
Attached Images
    
__________________
BSR-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2011, 09:53 PM   #222
BSR-1

 
BSR-1's Avatar
 
Drives: 17 ZL1 M6 Black
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Capo Beach, Ca
Posts: 1,411
Quote:
Originally Posted by 3859c1 View Post
The difference in size between an unported, head without gasket matching and the ported/gasket matched intake ports is substantial. If the heads aren't going to be gasket matched, then the intake manifold shouldn't be gasket matched either.
I've looked at the ports of the intake manifold and there is plenty of power to be had without gasket matching. So, a nice port job with some reshaping and enlarging of the inside of the ports and work to the inlet is all you guys will need if your not doing the heads. I think you'll be impressed with the gains!
the inside of the ports are kind of hard to reach without cutting the manifold in half and welding back together.
I didn't have any loss or detriment by gasket matching.
__________________
BSR-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2011, 09:56 PM   #223
ParisTNDude
Owning SSes for 50 Years
 
ParisTNDude's Avatar
 
Drives: Sharkskin Grey LT1
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Paris, TN
Posts: 3,139
Looks like something you would see during a colonostimy!!!
__________________
The new ride: 2023 Camaro, LT1, Sharkskin Grey

Previous Performance Cars:

1966 Chevelle SS 4M, 2010 Corvette 6M
1968 Dodge Charger R/T Auto 2012 1SS 6M
1982 Corvette Auto 2010 1SS 6A
1984 Corvette Auto 2016 2SS 8A
1999 Camaro Auto 2017 HBM 1SS 1le
2002 C5 Corvette 6M 2018 2SS
2006 Corvette Auto 2023 Camaro LT1
ParisTNDude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2011, 12:15 AM   #224
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,967
So you said it seems the power has moved higher in the RPM range. It sounds like your saying the power comes on just as early as before, but pulls even longer (good!)....OR...are you saying it seems you have to be higher in the rpms to get good power?
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2012 intake manifold usa1camaro1969 Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 33 09-01-2011 10:25 PM
PORTED THROTTLE BODY and INTAKE MANIFOLD ablackburn99 Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 29 07-19-2010 05:16 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.