![]() |
|
|
#15 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '12 Toyota Tacoma Dbl Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Beaufort, SC
Posts: 1,275
|
Quote:
I agree with turboguy. I have the mods, and with 87 I am getting around 29mpg on a 45mi stretch that I drive to the track out here. When I did the last trip out I had "clean" tank of 93 in it and I got 32mpg on the same distance. So I believe the car runs better with higher octane.
__________________
STANDING 1/4MI: 13.948@99.87 6600RPM HP/TQ Gains - 30.54HP/24.3TQ (NOT PEAK) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
I have no life
Drives: 06' Subaru STI, ex-Camaro V6 LLT Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Top Gear Test Track
Posts: 3,189
|
I'm sad, the gas station I'm used to filling up at used to have 94, but now they lowered it to 91 =(
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro LS Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,911
|
i use 88 which is the "regular" gas around here. i used to put mid-grade or premium but i just stick to regular now for day to day. especially with winter coming there won't be much driving.....
__________________
2010 Summit White Camaro LS / M6 MRT V2.0 ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 67 Camaro Convertible Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 1,718
|
I've had my car 16 months with 17,000 miles. I've used 87 oct. since day one. I haven't reset the DIC in about 6,000 miles, and I'm averaging 23.5 mpg. (city 60%, highway 40%)
My car has plenty of power for a DD. Would I have a little better performance with 93 oct.? Probably. Would the added gas mileage running 93 offset the added cost for fuel? Doubtful. Do I need more performance from my DD? No I'll keep running 87, car runs great with no issues.
__________________
_____________________________________________
2LT/RS RJT, Blk Rally Stripes, Beige Interior, SunroofPlaced order at dealer 4/24/09 1100 - 4/28/09 2000 - 5/01/09 2500 - 5/05/09 3000 - 5/05/09 3300 - 5/30/09 3400 - 6/05/09 3800 - 6/18/09 4000 - 6/18/09 4B00 - 6/18/09 4200 - 6/22/09 5000 - 7/01/09 6000 - 7/01/09 It's Home!! 0000 - 7/14/11 Traded in with 24,000 miles. Currently 5th Gen less |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() Drives: 2016 2SS A8 HB/JB Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 505
|
Yeah well we got 94 pure gas all over the place here. So take that.
![]() On the topic I used to run 94 but switched back to 87 recently. I haven't really noticed any difference in MPG's or performance. Though if I know I'm going to the track (drag or road course) I'll run the tank dry and fill up with 94. No point spending the extra money if it's hardly going to be noticed day to day.
__________________
Current: 2016 2SS Hyper Blue/Jet Black
Former: 2010 2LT/RS IOM/IO - Solo Catback w/ J-Pipes |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() Drives: 2010 Cyber Grey Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ga
Posts: 703
|
I found when I had 87 in it that when I had it under full throttle there was some power surges. Kind of like the timing was being adjusted on the fly and not to my benfit. With the expensive stuff I had the surging go away. I would say try two tankfuls and see if your car runs different where you live.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 1LT RS Rally Yellow Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: southern Illinois
Posts: 2,973
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
:middlefinger: for you and your 94 too! lmao. Because of the mods on the car, I'll keep running 91 (90%) adn spend the extra money. Car seems to like me for it. However, if PacMan was still stock, it would be 87 or 89 for him. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
![]() |
I use 89, 87 does give me a bit of knocking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Now get car tuned for 93 and get a nice HP bump.
__________________
2015 Corvette Z06.. Lime Rock Park 1:01; Watkins Glen 2:14; Thompson Speedway 1:21
Last edited by GQ4Life; 10-20-2010 at 08:10 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Red Brick of Vengeance!
Drives: 12 Second Brick Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: at my pulpit
Posts: 7,745
|
This is simply NOT TRUE! We have been over this many times. One guy here who owns a dyno actually showed some HP gain by running higher octane! As I pointed out, the V6 is OVER SPARKED! If you run 87 octane you will find that the knock sensors are very active and pull quite a bit of timing! Remember their job is to stop the knock before YOU can hear it in the cabin. Running higher octane, like 93 the knock sensors are less active! The old way of thinking that you have to be specifically tune for higher octane does not apply to this V6...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Ok I wrote it wrong writing using cell phone. Fixed it.
__________________
2015 Corvette Z06.. Lime Rock Park 1:01; Watkins Glen 2:14; Thompson Speedway 1:21
Last edited by GQ4Life; 10-20-2010 at 06:39 AM. Reason: update cuz writing error |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#26 | |
|
Red Brick of Vengeance!
Drives: 12 Second Brick Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: at my pulpit
Posts: 7,745
|
Quote:
"unless car is tuned for 94 over 87 there's is no HP increase unless car is getting knock with 87 there will be no HP increase Now get car tuned for 93 and get a nice HP bump. " Ok... let me rephrase things... The car appears to be "tuned" for higher octane right from the factory. The knock sensors however let you run 87 octane. The thing is unless you are monitoring the knock sensors you don't even know your car is "knocking" with 87! There is no need to get a tune for 93! You can get an HP bump from 93 with the stock tune! You don't need a tune to take advantage of higher octane!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 11 F150 EB/13 Sonic RS/15 Z06 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 7,127
|
Hey Scrming, do you think it is possible that these things are programmed to advance until they detect knock and then back off a bit? That would be cool, but probably just wishful thinking?
__________________
New Ride -- 2015 Z06 2LZ (stock) -- Journal
Old Ride -- 2012 Camaro 2LT/RS (647 RWHP & 726 RWTQ) -- Build Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
SRT4's were this way. Suppose to be tuned for 91 but they got usually about 3 degrees of or so of knock.. run better at 93 and made more HP The toys were best. Had button that you can put in 100 octane then hit button for a nice 30HP jump
__________________
2015 Corvette Z06.. Lime Rock Park 1:01; Watkins Glen 2:14; Thompson Speedway 1:21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Octane Ratings? | Icefsh | Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 12 | 03-10-2015 06:10 AM |
| V6 Guys Only | spyderbuddy | Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 166 | 02-07-2011 03:23 PM |
| How much octane boost can you put in your tank? | OHIOSS | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 11 | 05-21-2010 09:41 AM |
| Anyone running something other than 87? | jeansonne627 | Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 31 | 10-01-2009 03:40 PM |
| No 93 Octane in California | tribone | Mechanical Maintenance: Break-in / Oil & Fluids / Servicing | 15 | 08-27-2009 05:18 PM |