Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Roto-Fab
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-14-2013, 12:54 PM   #15
el ess A
Older Than Dirt
 
el ess A's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 & 2013 Camaros
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 4,687
The ford faithful will always try to strawman the argument that nobody else seems able to get to 200, but to me, 190, 196 mph is plenty fast enough!

Let's all be thankful we have cars of any brand that have >85 mph speedometers and can actually come close to burying them. Three cheers for Horsepower, in whatever form it comes!
__________________
2010 2SS TE, 1 of 822/2013 Camaro ZL1 vert, 1 of 54

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=26108&dateline=142898  4774
el ess A is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 01:21 PM   #16
Fenderaddict2
Opinionated bugger!
 
Fenderaddict2's Avatar
 
Drives: Boss 302, Mazda 2, Praga & Intrepid
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oakville
Posts: 1,897
Quote:
Originally Posted by el ess X View Post
The ford faithful will always try to strawman the argument that nobody else seems able to get to 200, but to me, 190, 196 mph is plenty fast enough!

Let's all be thankful we have cars of any brand that have >85 mph speedometers and can actually come close to burying them. Three cheers for Horsepower, in whatever form it comes!
The "faithful" regardless of brand affiliation will always defend their brand whether it's 200 MPH, or 7:41 Ring time. They are recorded, but difficult to achieve on a daily basis. They are marketing numbers, pure and simple.
__________________


Follow me on forums everywhere as Fenderaddict2 or my kid on the track and Twitter @fastmyles
Fenderaddict2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 01:27 PM   #17
el ess A
Older Than Dirt
 
el ess A's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 & 2013 Camaros
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Aiken, SC
Posts: 4,687
Don't get me wrong, I'm not a Mustang fan in any regard, as my "religion" is deeply embedded within GM. Recent chest x-rays suggest my heart is shaped like a bowtie. But I respect the "enemy"! Competition for the performance segment makes us all winners.
__________________
2010 2SS TE, 1 of 822/2013 Camaro ZL1 vert, 1 of 54

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=26108&dateline=142898  4774
el ess A is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 02:25 PM   #18
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crazy Coast
Posts: 15,846
I don't think Ford lied about it. Under the right conditions, and at the right track, I'm sure it could. However - at the same time - a hero run can't always be gospel. Look how hard it was for Lingenfelter's ZL1 to get to 200. That heatsoak is a beesh, and running that much boost isn't helping matters. I'm sure that over-rev' feature was pretty much defeated in that run.

I don't could the Shelby out for 200-MPH, but it would be nice to see it reproduced. It doesn't really matter in the end, to me though.
__________________

'20 ZL1 Black "Fury"
A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor
Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 02:56 PM   #19
Camarowguy


 
Camarowguy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 imperial blue SS, black 92 RS
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Denham Springs
Posts: 2,580
This is old news. I posted the article months ago. Maybe from a different mag, but nonetheless, lives up to fords fullofshitness as usual. Always over rate and under deliver. The only company I've ever heard of that had a recall to make more power when people were dynoing their cars stock and not getting what ford advertised.
__________________
2011 imperial blue SS/RS a6 12.43@112 vararam, tune, jba cats, magnaflow axle back, self ported tb, under drive pulley, NO headers, Stock tires. 1.87 60ft. Stock tires. SOLD :(
2000 1500 silverado extra cab SOLD :(
2017 Silverado 5.3 all stock
2004 5.7 GTO 78mm turbo
Camarowguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 03:00 PM   #20
Russell James


 
Russell James's Avatar
 
Drives: '15 SS 1LE, '69 Z28 drag car
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Mich
Posts: 4,482
Ford has a 5 mile oval at their Romeo MI proving grounds. I've heard some NASCAR testing there that sounds like 'Dega x 2. I know the cup cars have gotten way up over 200 there, but that is with over 900 hp and incredibly smooth aero.

The aero is the problem with the pony cars, and the heat soak once you start spending so many minutes at WOT. Plus it might kick into cat protection mode and try to prevent overheating the cats. 635 hp can easily take ZR1 up over 200, but it's very aero. Put that same hp in a brick of a pony car and there is going to be a huge wall that will take forever to inch past around 190ish. And when spending forever at WOT trying to inch up one mph at a time.... that is when the heat soak, and cat protection might start to become a problem.

Downhill, with a tail wind, on a 20 mile straight.... she'll do 200. I'll forgive those last few mphs... it's a bad ass car.
Russell James is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 03:31 PM   #21
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crazy Coast
Posts: 15,846
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camarowguy View Post
This is old news. I posted the article months ago. Maybe from a different mag, but nonetheless, lives up to fords fullofshitness as usual. Always over rate and under deliver. The only company I've ever heard of that had a recall to make more power when people were dynoing their cars stock and not getting what ford advertised.
Yeah - but they fixed that car and underrated the replacement, lol. They terminated
__________________

'20 ZL1 Black "Fury"
A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor
Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 04:54 PM   #22
eolson
eolson
 
eolson's Avatar
 
Drives: 2006 premium Package Mustang GT cou
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Northville, MI
Posts: 249
Great, let's see the test videos of the aftermarket ZL1's easily going over 200mph, otherwise it's just an assumption.

Ford should have officially rated the GT500 at 195mph, which numerous mags have taken it to, but they got greedy. Erik
__________________
2006 Prem Pkg Mustang GT coupe. Saleen SC,10psi, 454rwhp,442rwtq, Complete Steeda/H&R, suspension change out, with weight loss, Techco Watts link, Stoptech big brakes, Race clutch, Alum. flywheel, Alum 1 pc driveshaft, 9x18,10x18 chrome bullit wheels, 285/40/18,255/45/18 nitto 555 tires. 3545 lbs currently. New car scent air freshener.
eolson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 07:27 PM   #23
driyac

 
driyac's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 45th Anniversary 2SS
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: West Chester Ohio
Posts: 1,845
Quote:
Originally Posted by el ess X View Post
The ford faithful will always try to strawman the argument that nobody else seems able to get to 200, but to me, 190, 196 mph is plenty fast enough!

Let's all be thankful we have cars of any brand that have >85 mph speedometers and can actually come close to burying them. Three cheers for Horsepower, in whatever form it comes!
Quote:
Originally Posted by The IOM Ninja View Post
Don't speak such blasphemy... GM is the almighty that can do no wrong and tell no lie.... Except wait it's a corporation using marketing tactics. Just like Ford. :rollseyes:
Quote:
Originally Posted by NVmyZL1 View Post
So, if nobody else is ever able to hit a 7:41 ring time in a ZL1 , can we call GM a liar, too?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenderaddict2 View Post
The "faithful" regardless of brand affiliation will always defend their brand whether it's 200 MPH, or 7:41 Ring time. They are recorded, but difficult to achieve on a daily basis. They are marketing numbers, pure and simple.
Quote:
Originally Posted by el ess X View Post
Don't get me wrong, I'm not a Mustang fan in any regard, as my "religion" is deeply embedded within GM. Recent chest x-rays suggest my heart is shaped like a bowtie. But I respect the "enemy"! Competition for the performance segment makes us all winners.
Quote:
Originally Posted by radz28 View Post
I don't think Ford lied about it. Under the right conditions, and at the right track, I'm sure it could. However - at the same time - a hero run can't always be gospel. Look how hard it was for Lingenfelter's ZL1 to get to 200. That heatsoak is a beesh, and running that much boost isn't helping matters. I'm sure that over-rev' feature was pretty much defeated in that run.

I don't could the Shelby out for 200-MPH, but it would be nice to see it reproduced. It doesn't really matter in the end, to me though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russell James View Post
Ford has a 5 mile oval at their Romeo MI proving grounds. I've heard some NASCAR testing there that sounds like 'Dega x 2. I know the cup cars have gotten way up over 200 there, but that is with over 900 hp and incredibly smooth aero.

The aero is the problem with the pony cars, and the heat soak once you start spending so many minutes at WOT. Plus it might kick into cat protection mode and try to prevent overheating the cats. 635 hp can easily take ZR1 up over 200, but it's very aero. Put that same hp in a brick of a pony car and there is going to be a huge wall that will take forever to inch past around 190ish. And when spending forever at WOT trying to inch up one mph at a time.... that is when the heat soak, and cat protection might start to become a problem.

Downhill, with a tail wind, on a 20 mile straight.... she'll do 200. I'll forgive those last few mphs... it's a bad ass car.
Quote:
Originally Posted by radz28 View Post
Yeah - but they fixed that car and underrated the replacement, lol. They terminated
Quote:
Originally Posted by eolson View Post
Great, let's see the test videos of the aftermarket ZL1's easily going over 200mph, otherwise it's just an assumption.

Ford should have officially rated the GT500 at 195mph, which numerous mags have taken it to, but they got greedy. Erik

Still didn't hit 202 mph.

and the ring may not be touched when you have some of the best drivers in the world driving.
__________________
driyac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 08:14 PM   #24
Camaro_Corvette
36.58625, -121.7568
 
Camaro_Corvette's Avatar
 
Drives: Team 1LE
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,710
Quote:
Originally Posted by The IOM Ninja View Post
196 MPH is 315 KM/H
202 MPH is 330 KM/H

Also that article says 200 MPH which is 321 KM/H.

Like it even matters, Ford tested at Nardo where they would have had more than enough room to reach 202 MPH, and who the **** is even travelling at those speeds. Certainly no one in North America (Legally)…
This reminded me of a quote that I find funny.
Quote:
Okay, if you’re going to question the importance of an actor’s signature on a plastic helmet from a movie based on a comic book, then all of our lives have no meaning!




Quote:
Originally Posted by NVmyZL1 View Post
So, if nobody else is ever able to hit a 7:41 ring time in a ZL1 , can we call GM a liar, too?
There is a massive difference between driving a car in a straight line, and navigating a car as fast as humanly possible through over 150 turns of varying difficulties.
__________________
I am seriously never serious vv V vv Next order of business
Camaro_Corvette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 08:19 PM   #25
The IOM Ninja
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 10' IOM 2SS/RS, 13' GB Shelby GT500
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sherwood Park, AB
Posts: 2,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camaro_Corvette View Post
This reminded me of a quote that I find funny.






There is a massive difference between driving a car in a straight line, and navigating a car as fast as humanly possible through over 150 turns of varying difficulties.
Agreed and a car should go faster in a straight line than around a round track or any track for that matter. There is clearly more to it than there seems but I think we can all agree the Mustang and Camaro are about as aerodynamically setup for going 200 MPH as a brick is...
The IOM Ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 08:29 PM   #26
trademaster
 
Drives: 12 MP4-12C, 16 Quattroporte
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Working
Posts: 707
Conditions, conditions, conditions. Altitude, temperature, barometric pressure, tire pressure, driver weight, among many other things all impact top speed. Pobst said it would hit 200+ in ideal conditions and I believe him, there is no reason not to. Aero limited top speed is a whole different ball game than a governed or gear limited top speed. If you want to call Ford a liar because their claim hasn't been reproduced, I suggest you examine the 1.6 60ft achieved by GM in a stock tire zl1. Has anyone else done it? No. Does that mean it isn't possible with perfect track conditions and a perfect launch? No.
trademaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 08:41 PM   #27
Camaro_Corvette
36.58625, -121.7568
 
Camaro_Corvette's Avatar
 
Drives: Team 1LE
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 23,710
With ideal conditions, I can kick a football for a field goal from 80 yards out.
__________________
I am seriously never serious vv V vv Next order of business
Camaro_Corvette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2013, 08:56 PM   #28
trademaster
 
Drives: 12 MP4-12C, 16 Quattroporte
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Working
Posts: 707
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camaro_Corvette View Post
With ideal conditions, I can kick a football for a field goal from 80 yards out.
No you can't.
trademaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.