Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Vararam
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-15-2009, 07:49 PM   #15
04ssSilverado
 
04ssSilverado's Avatar
 
Drives: above `12 zl1 #780
Join Date: May 2009
Location: holly-springs,nc
Posts: 197
i dated a chemist for a very short time, because she made about as much sense.
04ssSilverado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2009, 07:50 PM   #16
scrming
Red Brick of Vengeance!
 
scrming's Avatar
 
Drives: 12 Second Brick
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: at my pulpit
Posts: 7,745
I can see the ECU pulling timing from time to time... but I don't have enough insight to know why it is pulling timing... the knock sensor PIDs on my dashhawk don't seem to work... all i can monitor is Spark Retard.... seems like it pulls less timing when running higher octane... but I can't be 100% sure why... could be a number for factors...
scrming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2009, 07:53 PM   #17
scrming
Red Brick of Vengeance!
 
scrming's Avatar
 
Drives: 12 Second Brick
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: at my pulpit
Posts: 7,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by 04ssSilverado View Post
i dated a chemist for a very short time, because she made about as much sense.
"She makes champagne out of 7-Up and cheap wine... Like a chemist"

- Was (Not Was) - Earth to Doris
scrming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2009, 09:16 PM   #18
CamaroDreams07


 
CamaroDreams07's Avatar
 
Drives: Slow V6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: East Lansing, MI
Posts: 9,361
Quote:
Originally Posted by squat View Post
I only run what is specified in the manual. Like others have said, the issue is with the PCM controlling the burn, higher than 87 wouldn't give me any extra benefit because my PCM is tuned for 87. Now if I were to get a tune for my car (if one ever came out) and was able to switch the timing then I would use different octane.

On a side note, it's interesting that octane is not the proper chemical term for the carbon chain. It's a pentane with 3 extra carbons and looks like this:




It's correct chemical name is 2,2,4 tri-methyl pentane. The 2/2/4 denote where the methyl groups are on the pentane chain. I suppose they call it octane because technically it still has 8 carbons, and octane rolls off the tongue better than 2,2,4 tri-methyl pentane.
I took organic chemistry too..congratulations on cracking this huge coverup by the gas companies.
CamaroDreams07 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 08:17 PM   #19
squat

 
Drives: 2011 Dodge Charger
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: MN
Posts: 1,070
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroDreams07 View Post
I took organic chemistry too..congratulations on cracking this huge coverup by the gas companies.
Dude, no need to be a dick. I like learning random tidbits of information, I figure others might too. If you didn't care for that piece of knowledge kindly just ignore it. Since you already knew that piece of knowledge there is no need to comment on it one way or another.
__________________
2011 Dodge Charger
squat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2009, 08:39 PM   #20
bigd1276
2017 HyperBlue 2SS
 
bigd1276's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 HyperBlue Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 2,206
Sorry fellas, I failed High School chemistry. I run nothing but Sunoco 92. Not sure why, I just do.
__________________
]
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=30755

2010 IBM 2LT RS......Traded for.....
2012 IBM 2SS RS......Traded for.....
2017 HBM 2SS
bigd1276 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2009, 08:14 AM   #21
JesusIRL
 
JesusIRL's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Rally Yellow 2LT Camaro
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 26
Hey guys, I've been a quiet lurker on this site for a while now but I actually need to do some questioning myself here on this one so I finally registered lol.

The salesman at the dealership where I bought my car told me to put nothing but premium gas (93 octane here)... I saw the OM said 87 or higher... I read above that running higher octane would cause more carbon buildup which I REALLY don't want. Was that statement true? Would there be any negative effects if I switch down to 87 octane now?

My car has roughly 230 miles on it only so far.
JesusIRL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2009, 08:23 AM   #22
scrming
Red Brick of Vengeance!
 
scrming's Avatar
 
Drives: 12 Second Brick
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: at my pulpit
Posts: 7,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by JesusIRL View Post
Hey guys, I've been a quiet lurker on this site for a while now but I actually need to do some questioning myself here on this one so I finally registered lol.

The salesman at the dealership where I bought my car told me to put nothing but premium gas (93 octane here)... I saw the OM said 87 or higher... I read above that running higher octane would cause more carbon buildup which I REALLY don't want. Was that statement true? Would there be any negative effects if I switch down to 87 octane now?

My car has roughly 230 miles on it only so far.
Salesman is wrong... you can run 87...

Not sure of the carbon build up... my gut instinct is that it wouldn't be a problem... but I have nothing to back that up...
scrming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2009, 10:46 AM   #23
JesusIRL
 
JesusIRL's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Rally Yellow 2LT Camaro
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 26
Awesome, thanks!
JesusIRL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2009, 11:54 AM   #24
squat

 
Drives: 2011 Dodge Charger
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: MN
Posts: 1,070
The grade of gas you put in should not damage it whether it needs higher octane or lower. The computer should detect the higher/lower grade of gasoline and adjust ignition timing to match.

However, I remember some of the V8 guys saying that their car was stuck on the 87 octane ignition tables even though they put only premium in. This is because the dealer put 87 in for the first tank and the car never relearned for the higher octane. My advice is to just stick to what's in the manual, 87 is cheaper and without a tune you probably don't get much in the way of performance from higher grade.
__________________
2011 Dodge Charger
squat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2009, 03:34 PM   #25
garcmol


 
garcmol's Avatar
 
Drives: 10 1LT SIM; 91 B4C sleeper Z
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ft. Mitchell, Alabama
Posts: 7,198
Quote:
Originally Posted by squat View Post
I only run what is specified in the manual. Like others have said, the issue is with the PCM controlling the burn, higher than 87 wouldn't give me any extra benefit because my PCM is tuned for 87. Now if I were to get a tune for my car (if one ever came out) and was able to switch the timing then I would use different octane.

On a side note, it's interesting that octane is not the proper chemical term for the carbon chain. It's a pentane with 3 extra carbons and looks like this:




It's correct chemical name is 2,2,4 tri-methyl pentane. The 2/2/4 denote where the methyl groups are on the pentane chain. I suppose they call it octane because technically it still has 8 carbons, and octane rolls off the tongue better than 2,2,4 tri-methyl pentane.

ummm....... huh?
__________________
Pedders Pace Car Package, Injen CAI, Flowmaster AT, AAC Lighting, ZL1 fascia/skirts, RKSport Ram Air hood, vented fenders, painted stripes (Gary's Customz), Honor and Valor badged (Thank you, John)
garcmol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2009, 08:12 PM   #26
mfr1950

 
mfr1950's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 challengerR/T , 2010 Ram R/T
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 1,186
Been using 89 in mine,seems to idle smoother, also accelerates smoother.. IMO
mfr1950 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2009, 01:12 PM   #27
speedymike
 
Drives: 2010 SS/RS Silver Ice Metallic
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 7
Does the 2SS (426 hp w/6 speed manual) require premium fuel or will regular work fine in it? Has anyone with this engine/tranny combo tried regular? The identifying info next to the earlier posters on this thread all seem to have the V6 and I'm guessing that's what they have been talking about. Thanks for the help! I am expecting to get mine within the next week or so...can't wait!
speedymike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2009, 02:36 PM   #28
ckaram

 
ckaram's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2SS RS, 1968 ragtop
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,850
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedymike View Post
Does the 2SS (426 hp w/6 speed manual) require premium fuel or will regular work fine in it? Has anyone with this engine/tranny combo tried regular? The identifying info next to the earlier posters on this thread all seem to have the V6 and I'm guessing that's what they have been talking about. Thanks for the help! I am expecting to get mine within the next week or so...can't wait!
You must put premium in your SS or you risk reducing its performance. V6 takes regular.
__________________
1968 Camaro Convertible LS1, T56
ckaram is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Camaro stops running 25th anniversary 3rd Generation Camaros 18 08-24-2015 12:18 PM
Disabling Daytime Running Light (DRL) buddylok Canada 7 10-07-2009 08:09 AM
What fuel are you running ? larietrope 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 13 07-10-2009 04:23 PM
Running Rough almodovarjose 4th Generation Camaros 20 03-23-2009 10:44 PM
LED tails, running lights mondain Cosmetics and Lighting Modification Discussions 13 02-16-2009 02:39 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.