![]() |
|
|
#15 | |
|
Does not have a Camaro
Drives: 99 silverado Z71/66 Chevelle SS Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 469
|
Quote:
but too high a compression is less maybe if they give us a small little turbo OEM or over the counter with some boost? say 5-8 pounds? nice economy and more then 300 horses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() Drives: 2014 Mustang Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Conroe, Texas
Posts: 642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | ||
|
Truth Enforcer
Drives: anything I can get my hands on Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: anywhere and everywhere
Posts: 22,797
|
yeah, we've discussed that option numerous times.
__________________
Never race anything you can't afford to light on fire and push off a cliff
A group as a whole tends to be smarter than the smartest person in that group until one jackass convinces everyone otherwise. Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Comic Curmudgeon
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS-2010 VW CC Sport Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Near Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,392
|
My sources are telling me that the Turbo Four Cylinder is pretty much a done deal for the Camaro.
May be an interesting alternative in light of the new CAFE regs and the need to lighten the car up somewhat. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() Drives: 96 Bronco w/ a 5 speed Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: PNW
Posts: 296
|
Are you talking about a small 4 (the new 1.6?) plus a V6 or the LNF instead of a V6? It can't see GM offering the LNF & LTT in the same car since the performance would be so similar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Moderator.ca
|
We have no reason to believe that a V6 won't be offered, so if there is a turbo4, it would most likely slot under the V6.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________ Originally Posted by FbodFather My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors...... ........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!__________________ Camaro Fest sub-forum |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 | |
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
Quote:
![]() Anyways, here's a brain teaser for you. There's no doubt that the Camaro will get a V6 -- and many reliable people are telling us, whether directly or not, that it will be 300hp. But if they put the Turbo 4 in the car, who's to say that it doesn't drop in power to maybe 220hp or something like that? They could do that and then by utilizing the turbo/direct injection combo, the powertrain guys could probably whip out a 30mpg Camaro. Besides, there's no real reason to have 260hp in the bottom-line car, not - like you said - when the V6 is so close to it in power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Gas engines: Here to stay | Mr. Wyndham | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 0 | 05-05-2008 04:34 PM |
| Steve Dinan: BMW sets the tone for future combustion engine development | Scotsman | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 1 | 03-25-2008 09:06 PM |
| Electric Superchargers? | DGthe3 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 17 | 12-17-2007 01:12 AM |
| JD Power survey: Younger Buyers Avoiding Domestics | Scotsman | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 6 | 12-04-2007 02:31 AM |
| "Great Mind" Paper in school | Mr. Wyndham | Off-topic Discussions | 36 | 11-27-2007 11:47 PM |