Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
TireRack
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-25-2008, 10:54 PM   #15
Vash


 
Drives: 00 Blazer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,100
I would not worry about it. It's not any bigger than the other gen's and they are cake to drive in terms of road room and parking. Only a test drive will tell if you like it.
Vash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 11:30 PM   #16
Dave McFly
*new car smell*
 
Dave McFly's Avatar
 
Drives: 2007 Ford Mustang 'Natasha'
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Jamestown, NY
Posts: 2,115
Send a message via ICQ to Dave McFly Send a message via AIM to Dave McFly Send a message via MSN to Dave McFly Send a message via Yahoo to Dave McFly Send a message via Skype™ to Dave McFly
Thumbs up

anybody else besides me totally digging the IROC style alloys on that prototoype? I know I am .


__________________
"May the forces of evil become confused on the way to your house."
George Carlin
Dave McFly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-25-2008, 11:32 PM   #17
stovt001


 
stovt001's Avatar
 
Drives: 2006 Cobalt, 2004 Taurus wagon
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 3,810
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragoneye View Post
Yet the other article said the exact opposite: That it didn't feel as big and hefty as it was. And even in the edmunds article, they mentioned right after the part about it being big that "...once we got to the three roads in the area that actually turn, the Camaro acquitted itself nicely, feeling much more nimble..."
Cool. I didn't see that in the other article. What really worries me is the obscene weight. 3900 lbs is just too much, and hearing things like low visibility makes it seem bigger does not ease that concern at all. To give you an idea of my size preferences, Camaro is at the large end, and the MX-5 is at the small end (and the MX-5 is in a very close second too! What can I say, I'm a man of extremes) with the middle being the Mazdaspeed3, WRX, Lancer Ralliart, etc. The rumored Pontiac badged alpha car would be on there, but since Pontiac looks like it won't be anything more than rebadged Chevy Cobalts, Cruzes, and Aveos, I don't think I'll be buying a car from that brand anytime soon. I love the Camaro, but its not set in stone for me and it has very tough competition.
__________________
"It's kind of fun to do the impossible" - Walt Disney

There's a great big beautiful tomorrow
shining at the end of every day
There's a great big beautiful tomorrow
Just a dream away
stovt001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 02:17 AM   #18
Vash


 
Drives: 00 Blazer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave McFly View Post
anybody else besides me totally digging the IROC style alloys on that prototoype? I know I am .


I had some Z28 rims on my 78 Camaro lol.

Got them from a pawn shop don't remember what year they came off I think 84.
Vash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 02:56 AM   #19
CWI
Helping Build America
 
CWI's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS,LS3 2013 Duramax 3500HD
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Freeport LPG Export
Posts: 3,836
I am surprised at all the people bitching about the weight. At 3700 to 3900 it is only a little heavier than a stanky Stang and lighter than Challenger with equivelent power. Also Zo6 Vette comes in around 3350 and larger price tag.

My old '68 was around 3700 and rated 375hp although they had around 425hp. That makes the '68 and 2010 pretty damn close and the new car has a lot more technology into it. It looks better than anything in it's class by far. Let's remember to compare apples to apples. If you want a Jap car just shut up and by a damn ricer.

No one knows what they are saying when they say GM copied Ford and Dodge. Didn't VW do a retro 5 years befor the '05 Stiny Stang?
__________________
Life's journey is not to arrive at the grave safely in a well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, totally worn out, shouting "Holy shit, what a ride!"
CWI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 10:00 AM   #20
Design1stCode2nd
 
Drives: four wheels
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: usa
Posts: 585
I would think we’ll see first drives of production cars around maybe November with full tests say in January or February. It’s getting close fellas.
Design1stCode2nd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 10:33 AM   #21
rayainsw
 
Drives: G8 GT\Corvette Coupe [ gone ]
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 64
MT pic

Quote:
Originally Posted by pinkcamaro10 View Post
im not sure, it was from this thread from a while back



http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5771



like i said, that is not a camaro steering wheel, we just guess it will be similar to that.

and i think it is actually called tapshift, or something like that.
A picture in the Motor Trend review ( preview ) seems to show paddles – poking just above the steering wheel spokes as well:

http://image.motortrend.com/f/108175...v6+cockpit.jpg

In this picture, it looks like a similar arrangement to the Corvette’s – to me . . .
- Ray
Occasionally known to be wrong . . .
rayainsw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 10:35 AM   #22
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crazy Coast
Posts: 15,787
Quote:
Originally Posted by CWIweldace View Post
I am surprised at all the people bitching about the weight. At 3700 to 3900 it is only a little heavier than a stanky Stang and lighter than Challenger with equivelent power. Also Zo6 Vette comes in around 3350 and larger price tag.

My old '68 was around 3700 and rated 375hp although they had around 425hp. That makes the '68 and 2010 pretty damn close and the new car has a lot more technology into it. It looks better than anything in it's class by far. Let's remember to compare apples to apples. If you want a Jap car just shut up and by a damn ricer.

No one knows what they are saying when they say GM copied Ford and Dodge. Didn't VW do a retro 5 years befor the '05 Stiny Stang?
Well, when some people come from 4th. Gens. that were about 3500 lbs., 3900 is a pretty big jump. Don't get me wrong, IMHO, if the weight is in the right places, for the right reasons, I'm fine with that as long as there's power there to make up the difference. From everything we're learning, the power is there, and that weight is in the right places, for the right reasons. There's no use in complaining anymore about it because it's already done. I'm ready for people to just accept what is there, and start looking at the car as a whole, and make a judgement after a test drive. You can't please everyone though.
__________________

'20 ZL1 Black "Fury"
A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor
Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 12:53 PM   #23
The_Blur
Moderator
 
The_Blur's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Harley-Davidson Street Bob
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 14,768
Send a message via AIM to The_Blur
Why do they talk so much about weight and so little about weight distribution?
__________________
RDP Motorsport//GEN5DIY//Cultrag Performance//JPSS//Rodgets Chevrolet//
Operation Demon//Buy at Invoice//RACECARWEAR
RESPECT ALL CARS. LOVE YOUR OWN.
warn 145:159 ban
The_Blur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2008, 11:11 PM   #24
stovt001


 
stovt001's Avatar
 
Drives: 2006 Cobalt, 2004 Taurus wagon
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 3,810
Quote:
Originally Posted by CWIweldace View Post
I am surprised at all the people bitching about the weight. At 3700 to 3900 it is only a little heavier than a stanky Stang and lighter than Challenger with equivelent power. Also Zo6 Vette comes in around 3350 and larger price tag.

My old '68 was around 3700 and rated 375hp although they had around 425hp. That makes the '68 and 2010 pretty damn close and the new car has a lot more technology into it. It looks better than anything in it's class by far. Let's remember to compare apples to apples. If you want a Jap car just shut up and by a damn ricer.

No one knows what they are saying when they say GM copied Ford and Dodge. Didn't VW do a retro 5 years befor the '05 Stiny Stang?
Don't get so uppity because I'm considering foreign made performance cars. The Camaro is one of the first thoroughly modern, no excuses affordable performance cars to come from an American manufacturer in years. Generally, if you wanted something decently quick and able to handle the twisties, you had to go foreign. The pure connection between driver, road, and car and amazing handling of the MX-5 are still unmatched in its price range. So you have to respect the Japanese for their performance cars. Not all of them are rice rockets.

The fact is the weight is a big disappointment. Notice that the difference in weight between the Mustang and Corvette is significantly smaller than the difference in weight between the Mustang and Camaro, even though the Corvette has 2 fewer seats and is made of plastic. We blasted the Challenger (rightfully so) for being fat, and the Camaro is nearly the same weight. Weight is the enemy of performance. It makes it harder to stop, go, and turn.

And I think it is ridiculous to tell someone to shut up and buy a foreign car instead of criticizing the Camaro. If we all just shut up and let a flaw this bad slide, then everyone would end up buying a Japanese car. Wouldn't want that would we? GM promised us they put the car on a diet, but it seems to have regained the weight as quickly as most dieters seem to. Pity.

In the end, the numbers themselves don't matter as much to me as what they represent. A great 0-60 is important, but only because of how nice that acceleration will feel and how well it will explode out of corners. Likewise, the actually poundage doesn't directly matter, but if it feels as heavy as it really is, that's a problem. All reviews of the G8 that I've read say that it seems to shrink around you and really doesn't feel like a full-size sedan. Great. If the Camaro can do that, then this won't be a problem. Some articles says it does feel smaller. Edmunds says that while it still handles well, it ultimately feels big and bulky. We'll see who's right and that will partially decide whether I get it or not.
__________________
"It's kind of fun to do the impossible" - Walt Disney

There's a great big beautiful tomorrow
shining at the end of every day
There's a great big beautiful tomorrow
Just a dream away
stovt001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2008, 06:38 PM   #25
str8himalaya
A lot to learn!
 
str8himalaya's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro SS Transformers Edition
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ohio
Posts: 132
Where does everybody expect them to cut weight with all the safety standards now days? It has IRS, that adds weight too. All these people are so upset about the weight. That weight saved my life a couple years back. If i was in a little honda or something of the sort, i would have been toast, instead i was in a midsize (intrepid) and i thank god everyday that i was. Instead of whinning about the weight, how about all of us try and figure out where to cut it out? Not going to happen, because most everything someone suggests has already been discussed and researched. They made it for a reason like it is, lets just wait to see and then make a judgement.
__________________
2012 Camaro SS Transformers Edition.


Current Mods:
-Kooks LTH with hi-flow cats
-H-Pipe, resonator and muffler delete
-Cold Air Industries CAI
-Power Wedge
str8himalaya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2008, 08:15 PM   #26
Vash


 
Drives: 00 Blazer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,100
Well it's not gonna happen now the frame and power train are done deals.

A lot of buyers are gonna be coming from SUV's and trucks so this is nothing weight wise.

What's more important is that in a crash you can walk away / live another day. At the end of a day it's only a machine. As much as we love them otherwise.
Vash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2008, 08:51 PM   #27
MerF
Go Rays!
 
MerF's Avatar
 
Drives: 03 Trailblazer
Join Date: May 2007
Location: St Pete, Florida
Posts: 2,532
I can't wait for the day that 15 punctuation marks at the end of a sentence is not considered a valid way to express a point.
MerF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2008, 10:04 PM   #28
GTAHVIT
Blessed
 
GTAHVIT's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Sonic RS MT
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Saint Augustine FL
Posts: 28,441
^You're in for a long frustrating wait....


I hope it doesn't ruin it for you...
GTAHVIT is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Edmunds: Tahoe Hybrid vs. GL320 clean diesel Scotsman General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 2 12-15-2008 09:13 AM
Chevrolet Volt Urthman General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 160 09-29-2008 09:17 PM
Edmunds buys a G8 GT for long term test fleet Scotsman General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 4 04-17-2008 10:21 PM
New Malibu Review on Edmunds stovt001 General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 6 11-03-2007 01:31 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.