The 2011+ Mustang Thread

[BlackieRay]

Originally Posted by ViperTomcat

This post is so completely full of fail that I'm surprised it hasnt shot itself.

You dont know anything at all about the new Mustang GT or about the Camaro for that matter, based on the 'facts' you puked out into this post.

Shall I make a post detailing everywhere where you're wrong or just leave it at..

You are wrong.

your choice.

I would expect this kind of angry response from a guy who owns the only musclecar a 2009 GT can beat.

[2SSARMY]

Originally Posted by BlackieRay

I would expect this kind of angry response from a guy who owns the only musclecar a 2009 GT can beat easily.

[Mr. Wyndham]

I think the best this outcome has proven is that these cars are close...and it comes down to the driver.

But there always has to be a 'winner'...doesn't there?....

[assasinator]

the winner is the guy who can tree the other guy .2-.4, because the other guy has no clue.

[SGOS252382]

Originally Posted by DGthe3

Did you add an extra 0? The RS package adds practically no weight to an SS, its probably within 5 lbs. And the only major weight difference between a 1SS and 2SS will be the seats. Heated leather seats won't add 200 lbs a piece over cloth. Possibly 20, but not 200. Beyond those seats, the differences are down to electronics which might be another 5 lbs.

This is how stuff like this gets started.

Here's a question/quote from a different forum.

"I looked at a 2SS the other day and it weighed in at about 4600lbs. What do the 1SS's weigh in at since they don't have leather and some of the other options?"

Then someone else started talking about how the 4th generation Camaro's weigh 400 lbs less than the 5th gens.

I can see someone getting confused and thinking the 2SS weighs 400lbs more than the 1SS. When in reality they were discussing the 4th gen Camaro vs 5th gen.

[Doc]

Originally Posted by assasinator

man your avatar is incredible. THATS a race car.

Yowzer!

[ViperTomcat]

Originally Posted by BlackieRay

I would expect this kind of angry response from a guy who owns the only musclecar a 2009 GT can beat.

Considering I ran 13.6 seconds with a DA of over 2,200 feet, which at sea level is around 13.1 seconds...

I dont have much to worry about. Thanks for your "concern".

[meanmike]

Originally Posted by ViperTomcat

Considering I ran 13.6 seconds with a DA of over 2,200 feet, which at sea level is around 13.1 seconds...

I dont have much to worry about. Thanks for your "concern".

He's just upset because they dont make TA's anymore.

[chevymuscle311]

Originally Posted by BlackieRay

None of this is surprising. I'm completely unimpressed with the V-tec Mustang. Despite the hype, the GT is still not a serious competitor for the SS. Ford is going to have to do more than copy Honda technology and put a new coat of paint on the old mod motor. At least it beats that old slug they were pawning off on everyone last year.

Best response here. And there is no way in hell a stock GT ran a 12.7. A Grand Sport Vette runs a 12.5

[ViperTomcat]

Originally Posted by chevymuscle311

Best response here. And there is no way in hell a stock GT ran a 12.7. A Grand Sport Vette runs a 12.5

Your right..Ford sent 6+ fully modded Mustangs out to all the test mags in the Press Event.


So let me get this straight...a stock Mustang GT can run 12.7, a stock Camaro can run 12.6ish stock...

Where is your outrage that a Camaro ran almost as fast as a Grand Sport Vette? I mean I think you'd be more mad about that than a Mustang running two tenths slower.

[2010 SSRS]

Camaro is king, welcome to Camaroland

[squatin0n18s]

Originally Posted by BlackieRay

I would expect this kind of angry response from a guy who owns the only musclecar a 2009 GT can beat.

Man i don't even own a challenger and i felt that blow...

[8cd03gro]

Originally Posted by BlackieRay

None of this is surprising. I'm completely unimpressed with the V-tec Mustang. Despite the hype, the GT is still not a serious competitor for the SS. Ford is going to have to do more than copy Honda technology and put a new coat of paint on the old mod motor. At least it beats that old slug they were pawning off on everyone last year.

You're a joke.

This article just shows how much of a drivers race it is. If you want to look at the cold, hard facts, the mustang has still been faster in the majority of comparisons, however slight. These cars are extremely close competitors in every single way.

[TheClassicCarKid]

Originally Posted by chevymuscle311

Best response here. And there is no way in hell a stock GT ran a 12.7. A Grand Sport Vette runs a 12.5

Haha I could run a gran sport faster than 12.5 and I'm by no means a great driver. Where'd you get that number?