Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
KPM Fuel Systems
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-23-2012, 10:05 AM   #29
chozn4service


 
chozn4service's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 SS w/2SS A8 Blue Velvet
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: 39.793153,-86.238223
Posts: 3,678
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackSSRS View Post
V6 with RS package is gov. to 155 but the motor runs out of umph at 146, seen quite a few vids on youtube to prove it. so a v6 rs will do 146 before the engine can't push it any faster even though its gov to 155. anyone claiming over 146-147 has mods done or is lying, point blank.

Not to get into a debate with you blackSSRS, I've had enough of those over the past few weeks but I've personally seen 147MPH without mods and there was no lack of power, it was still running strong and hard! Professional driver behind the wheel and it was still nervy but a surprising experience to say the least and it was a one time trip when new, just to see what it would do. Mods have since been added and the car has not made another attempt due to lack of safe locations around but it was achieved once and I was pleasantly surprised.
__________________
Never grow up, it's a trap!
chozn4service is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2012, 10:15 AM   #30
SlingShot


 
SlingShot's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 ZL1 - #670
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Seminole, Fl.
Posts: 8,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by chozn4service View Post
Not to get into a debate with you blackSSRS, I've had enough of those over the past few weeks but I've personally seen 147MPH without mods and there was no lack of power, it was still running strong and hard! Professional driver behind the wheel and it was still nervy but a surprising experience to say the least and it was a one time trip when new, just to see what it would do. Mods have since been added and the car has not made another attempt due to lack of safe locations around but it was achieved once and I was pleasantly surprised.

You may have gotten one freak run on the car, but it isn't the norm. Typically the V6 will Max out around the 145 mark, due to Aero drag and lack of down force. Anyone thinking they will run in the 160's stock, have been smoking something.
__________________
SlingShot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2012, 10:16 AM   #31
CamaroWinz
 
Drives: 2LT/RS (TBD)
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Englishtown NJ
Posts: 227
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlingShot View Post
You may have gotten one freak run on the car, but it isn't the norm. Typically the V6 will Max out around the 145 mark, due to Aero drag and lack of down force. Anyone thinking they will run in the 160's stock, have been smoking something.
You're making an assertion of physics, then? Show your work.
CamaroWinz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2012, 10:23 AM   #32
SlingShot


 
SlingShot's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 ZL1 - #670
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Seminole, Fl.
Posts: 8,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroWinz View Post
You're making an assertion of physics, then? Show your work.
No work to show, it's a known fact that the typical passenger car is designed to have lift and not down force and the Camaro is no different other than the ZL1.
__________________
SlingShot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2012, 10:32 AM   #33
CamaroWinz
 
Drives: 2LT/RS (TBD)
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Englishtown NJ
Posts: 227
Of course there's work. You're saying that drag and downforce contribute to limit the car's top speed. That's not an arbitrary assertion with respect to any individual car - there's actual math behind it, which determines the specific speeds at which that occurs. So with regard to that assertion, in the case of the Camaro - show your work. If you can't, then your assertion that the car is drag limited to 146 is just you makin' $hit up.
CamaroWinz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2012, 10:35 AM   #34
mattsfirstSS

 
mattsfirstSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro 1SS/RS L99
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Wilmington. NC
Posts: 794
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroWinz View Post
Of course there's work. You're saying that drag and downforce contribute to limit the car's top speed. That's not an arbitrary assertion with respect to any individual car - there's actual math behind it, which determines the specific speeds at which that occurs. So with regard to that assertion, in the case of the Camaro - show your work. If you can't, then your assertion that the car is drag limited to 146 is just you makin' $hit up.
That's all well and good but it doesnt make him wrong, he could in fact still be correct because you havent done the math either. Just leaves it as a hypothesis that needs testing and proved...i've been out of college for 7 years now and I have to work. Find a college engineer to do the math.
mattsfirstSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2012, 10:45 AM   #35
CamaroWinz
 
Drives: 2LT/RS (TBD)
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Englishtown NJ
Posts: 227
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattsfirstSS View Post
That's all well and good but it doesnt make him wrong, he could in fact still be correct because you havent done the math either. Just leaves it as a hypothesis that needs testing and proved...i've been out of college for 7 years now and I have to work. Find a college engineer to do the math.
He's only wrong in the sense that people have gone faster than he's suggesting is possible.
CamaroWinz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2012, 10:46 AM   #36
chozn4service


 
chozn4service's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 SS w/2SS A8 Blue Velvet
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: 39.793153,-86.238223
Posts: 3,678
I don't think a ZL1, designed for down force can do this. LOL
__________________
Never grow up, it's a trap!
chozn4service is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2012, 10:51 AM   #37
SlingShot


 
SlingShot's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 ZL1 - #670
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Seminole, Fl.
Posts: 8,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroWinz View Post
Of course there's work. You're saying that drag and downforce contribute to limit the car's top speed. That's not an arbitrary assertion with respect to any individual car - there's actual math behind it, which determines the specific speeds at which that occurs. So with regard to that assertion, in the case of the Camaro - show your work. If you can't, then your assertion that the car is drag limited to 146 is just you makin' $hit up.

That's pretty much impossible to determine the drag coefficient without precise measurements and a wind tunnel to prove anything. But common sense should tell you the V6 doesn't have the power needed to produce the numbers you are trying to tell. There are videos of drivers trying, and the typical numbers reached are 145 +/- 5 m

Now the ZL1 that is designed to create down force and with 580hp runs out of steam at around 184mph.
__________________
SlingShot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2012, 10:54 AM   #38
SlingShot


 
SlingShot's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 ZL1 - #670
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Seminole, Fl.
Posts: 8,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroWinz View Post
He's only wrong in the sense that people have gone faster than he's suggesting is possible.
I'm saying 145 +/-5 and it runs out of steam ... For a stock V6
__________________
SlingShot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2012, 11:22 AM   #39
camaro-dreamer
 
camaro-dreamer's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Porsche 981S
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: TN
Posts: 329
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroWinz View Post
You're making an assertion of physics, then? Show your work.
Assuming the gearing allows:

Power = Fd dot v = 1/2 * rho * Cd *A * v^3

= 1/2 * 1.2041 kg/m^3* 0.36* 2.35 m^2 * (65.3 m/s)^3 = 190 hp to go 146 mph

Of course, I haven't included frictional forces. This is just the drag.

If you only included that value and assume a 20% loss to the wheels, the camaro can theoretically go 160 mph.

Last edited by camaro-dreamer; 10-23-2012 at 11:33 AM.
camaro-dreamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2012, 11:46 AM   #40
mattsfirstSS

 
mattsfirstSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro 1SS/RS L99
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Wilmington. NC
Posts: 794
Quote:
Originally Posted by camaro-dreamer View Post
Assuming the gearing allows:

Power = Fd dot v = 1/2 * rho * Cd *A * v^3

= 1/2 * 1.2041 kg/m^3* 0.36* 2.35 m^2 * (65.3 m/s)^3 = 190 hp to go 146 mph

Of course, I haven't included frictional forces. This is just the drag.

If you only included that value and assume a 20% loss to the wheels, the camaro can theoretically go 160 mph.
Im not going to check your math but the minute you type out a bunch of metric values and then = hp i feel it needs checked
mattsfirstSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2012, 11:47 AM   #41
camaro-dreamer
 
camaro-dreamer's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Porsche 981S
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: TN
Posts: 329
Would the 1 hp / 746 W put your mind at ease, lol?
camaro-dreamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2012, 11:49 AM   #42
mattsfirstSS

 
mattsfirstSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro 1SS/RS L99
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Wilmington. NC
Posts: 794
Quote:
Originally Posted by camaro-dreamer View Post
Would the 1 hp / 746 W put your mind at ease, lol?
yes your conversion wasnt listed, -2 points
mattsfirstSS is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.