![]() |
|
|
#29 |
|
Banned
Drives: 1991 New Yorker, 69 Tbird, ABM2SSRS Join Date: May 2009
Location: BC Canada
Posts: 2,248
|
Because computers have not and will never 'error' right?
![]() I prefered it when the computers wernt involved with the automatic transmissions. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Motor Head
Drives: CTS-V Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: So MD
Posts: 494
|
With a trans tune the A6 can be quite impressive for a daily driver. Without the trans tune, it's a little boring.
__________________
History Camaro's: 83, 93, 95, 98, & 10.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
![]() Drives: 10' Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Somewhere, Fl.
Posts: 95
|
IMHO, this question relies more with the driver than the specific car... I mean, IF an "experienced" M6 driver can perform a solid launch and hit the mark at the right shift points, M6 all the way... In most cases though, like said before, the A6 over many runs will prove to be more consistent...
Note: Just my experience... More Manuals vs. Auto's hit the tracks from what I've seen... All cars in general... |
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
VIN #3026 IOM/IO
|
Stock the M6 with the extra horsepower and significantly less transmission power loss will win. Most M6 cars are putting about 370 hp to the rear wheels, the A6 cars only have 315-320 hp to the wheels. However with some transmission tuning and a new stall converter my A6 with 360 hp to the wheels has run 12.40's and has more in it, which is faster than any of the stock M6 cars have run even though the put down more power. Humans just can't shift faster than a computer.
However if you like banging gears the enjoyment of the M6 can't be replaced by an auto.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 | |
|
Commits weekly crime
|
Quote:
It's all we have to go on though, right now. And, my comment was in answer to someone saying "A6's are faster in the quarter mile". As of right now, that is just not true, and the numbers back that up. Everything else is personal opinion. Also, I'm talking about STOCK A6's vs M6's. Once you start modding everything goes out the window. Although, OrangeChevy does post the top times in 2 of the 3 other categories, and he's a M6.
__________________
2017 Camaro 1LT - Blue Barchetta IV
I fire up the willing engine, responding with a roar. Tires spitting gravel I commit my weekly crime. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Commits weekly crime
|
Just a follow up. I'm not trying to hate on Automatics here. Just trying to inject fact into what has been more opinion than anything else.
Also, stock vs stock is going to be the main measuring stick here, because as soon as you start modding it generally becomes apples to oranges rather than Washington Golden Delicious to Fuji Apples. Case in point? Fastest 2010 Camaro 1/4 mile is currently held by a manual. Many of you have probably seen the Hennessey vs. Super Cobra vs modded Challanger video by Motor trend? Camaro came up on top, but you can bet that Ford people are complaining about "but with better tires we would have destroyed you". Until people with stock Auto's start posting faster times in the 1/4 mile here, the only fact we have here at C5 is that the top 4 positions in 1/4 mile times are held by Manuals. And until that changes, saying Automatics are faster is going against the FACTS we have at our disposal. As others have said, Auto's will be more consistent. But, consistent doesn't mean faster.
__________________
2017 Camaro 1LT - Blue Barchetta IV
I fire up the willing engine, responding with a roar. Tires spitting gravel I commit my weekly crime. |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
![]() Drives: 2SS/RS Vortech/L99 Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: CHICAGO
Posts: 474
|
The Auto is FASTER.. AND very consistant no miss shifts. With both the A6 & the M6 being tuned and the TCM on the A6 and both being bolt on mods Headers and CAI the Auto's are turning faster 1/4 mile time than the Stick. I know all the M6's on here will say they rule but they don't.. sorry .. HERE ARE THE FACTS!
count them .. you tell me!! 1. OrangeChevy - 11.83 @ 116 mph, (LT, Exhaust, CAI, Tune, Skinny's, Drag Radials), (LS3, M6) 2. GMRULZ - 12.22 @ 113.29 mph, (LT, CAI, Tune), (L99, A6), (DA -648 ft.) 3. Wacker - 12.49 @ 111.57 mph, (LT, Exhaust, Tune, (L99, A6) 4. SGOS252382 - 12.55 @ 111.62 mph, (LT, Exhaust, CAI, Tune), (L99 A6) 5. SRT10KLR - 12.59 kph @ ?, (Mid Length Headers, Exhaust, CAI, DR's Tune), (L99, A6) 6. Nuptualnemesis - 12.61 @ 113.52 mph, (LT, CAI, Tune, T arm, Drag Radials), (LS3 M6),(DA +1793 ft.) 7. Darin Morgan - 12.66 @ 110.88 mph, (LT, Exhaust, CAI, Ported TB, Tune), (L99, A6) 8. Rick@Liverois - 12.68 @ 109.72 mph, (Exhaust, CAI, Pully, Tune), (L99, A6) 9. JP2010SS - 12.69 @ 112.58 mph, (LT, Exhaust, CAI, Tune), (LS3, M6) 10. Rodimus Prime - 12.73 @ 110 mph, (LT, CAI, Tune), (L99, A6) 11. Boostedyards86 - 12.74 @ 111.33 mph, (LT,CAI, Exhaust, 160 tstat), (LS3, M6), (DA +1589 ft.) 12. Number_9 - 12.74 @ 108.77 mph, (LT, CAI, Exhaust, Tune), (L99, A6) 13. FASST 1 - 12.75 @ 109.28 mph, (LT, CAI, Tune), (L99, A6) 14. Black5thgen - 12.78 @ 111.48 mph, (CAI, Tune), (LS3, M6) 15. DTM - 12.84 @ 109.84 mph, (Muffler Delete), (LS3, M6) 16. OctaneZ28 - 12.84 @ 108.15 mph, (Tune), (L99, A6), (DA -800 ft.) 17. Matt tune time - 12.94 @ 108.39 mph, (Tune), (L99, A6) 18. James4086 - 13.07 @ 111.06 mph, (LT, Exhaust, CAI, Tune), (L99, A6) 19. Patman - 13.15 @ 105 mph, (High Octane Gas), (L99, A6) 20. D1BADZ - 13.17 @ 110.53 mph, (Muffler Delete), (LS3, M6) 21. Kaler - 13.27 @ 109.11 mph, (Exhaust), (L99, 6) 22. Gen5SS - 13.28 @ 108.01 mph, (LT, Exhaust, CAI, DR's, Tune), (LS3, M6) 23. DonO - 13.28 @ 106.60 mph, (CAI), (L99 A6) 24. Oilman63 - 13.30 @ 111.13 mph, (LT, Exhaust, Nitto555), (LS3, M6) 25. mlee- 13.39 @ 105.83 mph, (CAI, Exhaust, Tune), (L99, A6) 26. d69Chris - 13.56 @ 104.07 mph, (Exhaust, CAI), (L99, A6) The TOP 5 The 12.5's and under are Auto's=4 Stick=1 Also the only reason there even one is a stick in TOP 5 list is he's running Drag Radials !!!! You can talk all you want why yours is better .. but here's the true facts!! is not a drivers race.. The Auto will always win! I have driven them both and to be Honest here with no Mod's it's a drivers race .. But with Tunes and lite Mod's Like for Like The Auto will really shine!! Last edited by tony1; 02-10-2010 at 01:51 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Commits weekly crime
|
Quote:
Again...show me STOCK A6's dominating, and you don't see them. After that, it's all about how much money and effort you put into modding your car. Automatics are about consistency. But, in either case, right now...Manuals are fastest until you get an Automatic that's built better than OrangeChevy. Till then, I still don't see Automatics as faster since they didn't beat his time. Claiming otherwise is sort of like saying Indianapolis won the Super Bowl.
__________________
2017 Camaro 1LT - Blue Barchetta IV
I fire up the willing engine, responding with a roar. Tires spitting gravel I commit my weekly crime. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
![]() Drives: 2SS/RS Vortech/L99 Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: CHICAGO
Posts: 474
|
Quote:
And your comment about beating OrangeChevy with his Drag Radials.. are we talking Top 5 or Top 10 or car is number 1? because if it's Top 5, 10, 25 the Auto's win. Last edited by tony1; 02-10-2010 at 03:32 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: RSSS Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 2,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: SuperCharged 2SS/RS IOM MN6 Join Date: May 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 5,094
|
No offense, but if you have to ask, then I doubt you are at a level to notice a difference. I have the MN6 but I think I would have been just as happy with the A6 power-feel wise. But in my opinion, the A6 console appearance is blah.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
![]() Drives: 2SS/RS Vortech/L99 Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: CHICAGO
Posts: 474
|
I got an idea .. How about a truce.. Lets just say the Auto and Stick are EQUAL!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
![]() Drives: 2011 Ford Mustang GT/CS 5.0 Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: DC Metro
Posts: 193
|
Why can't people just stick with the facts. I thought we were talking STOCK. That means (in case the word STOCK is not clear) no modifications. No trans tunes, headers, etc. What's so hard to understand about the word STOCK?
I could care less which is faster but the auto guys always make themselves (and others with autos) look bad when they keep saying that the auto (with a tune) is faster than a stock manual. One would think that the list of times for the STOCK cars would be as good of an answer as you're going to get. |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | ||
![]() Drives: 2SS/RS Vortech/L99 Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: CHICAGO
Posts: 474
|
Quote:
Quote:
Man ohh Man the Manual's just want to find a way to say there better ... I don't blame you.. who wants to hear Stock for Stock they are just about equal then throw in if they both have a Tune with Headers the Auto wins.. It will kinda piss you off if you have a stick ... But lets all just get along .. I think this post says it all .... Last edited by tony1; 02-10-2010 at 04:26 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| G8 GXP FASTER THAN CAMARO SS? | 1982camaro | Chevy Camaro vs... | 147 | 09-25-2011 11:30 PM |
| SS badging on/near Gauge Cluster | UCF w00t | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 56 | 08-15-2011 08:46 PM |
| Camaro5 invites you to say thanks to Camaro assemblers and tour the Martinrea plant! | Hylton | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 646 | 12-23-2009 04:41 PM |
| Well my Dad's SS is faster then me now :-( He went Magna! (eek 56k) | braSStax | Member Car Journals | 5 | 11-25-2009 06:17 PM |
| camaro ss or 06 vette? | Robin | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 45 | 08-23-2008 06:10 PM |