![]() |
|
|
#43 | |
![]() Drives: 2010 Chevy Camaro 2SS coupe (MT) Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Sacramento, CA - USA
Posts: 368
|
Katech heater hose relocation kit
Quote:
There’s like maybe 2 or 3 sharp spots in the side of the engine bay chassis, on the driver’s side, after you relocate the hoses to the inside of the heat shielding. Katech’s kit is simply just heater hoses and hose clamps, but they were nice enough to cut out a section of hosing for each hose, to wrap them around the sharp edged chassis areas. I ended up just using a single zip tie and they already wrapped around the hoses nicely. I had trouble getting the 3/4” hose to install at the way on the heater core port, so I gave up with it having like maybe 2-2.5 mm left for the hose to go all the way against the firewall. The hose still fully installed, so I wasn’t too crazy about it; and I used their worm gear hose clamps, because it was wayyy easier than trying to use the factory spring clamps. I did, however, retain the spring clamps at the water pump thermostat fitting, to keep that OEM look. One kinda annoying area, is the furthest back coil pack on the passenger’s side valve cover. If you have to dissemble the coil pack and adjust the bracket/hardware around there, it’s kind of a pain to do so. You gotta muscle the hoses around, and if you move them enough, the rubber hoses can kink if you’re too crazy with it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
It don’t come easy.
|
Bringing this thread back to life as it gets closer to spring. The plug that goes in the block, which needs a 17mm hex wrench. It has a rubber seal so, should one use or not use thread tape and what should it be torqued to?
Thanks
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
![]() Drives: 2010 Chevy Camaro 2SS coupe (MT) Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Sacramento, CA - USA
Posts: 368
|
Quote:
Google says that the original coolant block fitting for the LS3 engines were torqued to around 44 ft/lbs of torque. But keep in mind that that’s aluminum, and what we now have is brass. I didn’t really mind personally, and torqued by hand, since I was afraid of stripping or over-tightening. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#46 | |
![]() |
Quote:
Their directions for their oil cooler kit (which includes the removal of the factory cooler) states the coolant plug should be tightened to 45 ft/lbs plus 1/4 turn. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 | |
|
It don’t come easy.
|
Quote:
I have the new version with sealing washer.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 | |
![]() Drives: 2010 Chevy Camaro 2SS coupe (MT) Join Date: Jan 2024
Location: Sacramento, CA - USA
Posts: 368
|
Quote:
Side note, my factory coolant block fitting was seized as hell, and I had to use a 3 ft breaker bar with the 34mm hex socket on it. The fitting had some corrosion I think, and it smelled awful when it came out. There was also lots of teflon tape on the factory coolant block fitting, so I assume that’s what they used during assembly. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#49 |
|
It don’t come easy.
|
Finally did the delete today. Did take a bit of effort with the headers on. Only thing I can add is you’ll have to take apart the cooler in order to get it past the headers.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
It don’t come easy.
|
And the best part is…no more wet oil pan and surrounding areas from the leaker cooler. Well, heater more than a cooler.
Still might entertain the thought of a thermostated actual cooler.
__________________
Last edited by 0stones0; 04-13-2025 at 05:55 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#51 | |
![]() Drives: 2010 Chevy Camaro 2SS manual coupe Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Sacramento, Ca
Posts: 84
|
Quote:
I would probably highly suggest rigging up a 30 or even 34-35 row cooler if you plan on tracking the car. I'm holding a steady operating coolant temp of around 198-205 F; and most of the time, it's usually under 200 F. As for the engine oil temps, I don't know the actual numbers yet, since I've only been eyeing my oil temp gauge. It's estimated ofc, so the needle still sits around the area that it did before, prior to me deleting the stock water to oil cooler, and installing my own air to oil cooler. I'm guessing it's anywhere from like 10-15 F degrees cooler, but I haven't confirmed this dead on yet. I also opted for a thermostatic oil feed, especially if it's going to be a daily driver. I think having a 215 F t-stat on my 25-row oil cooler, seems to do pretty decent. I think I would probably get a lower t-stat (180 or 200 F) or just opt for a straight oil cooler with no t-stat; although do note that I live in CA, and I also run 0w-40 weight engine oil. If you were to probably run a 30+ row oil cooler, I would definitely consider a t-stat. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| l99, leak, oil cooler |
|
|