Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
KPM Fuel Systems
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-15-2010, 06:00 PM   #43
Autobot
 
Autobot's Avatar
 
Drives: 2SS RS M6 06 Jetta TDI 17 Civic EXL
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: GRANBURY, TX
Posts: 588
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bogey99 View Post
I found a place that has 100 at the pump too. A previously mentioned by others, would running a few gallons of it be the practical thing to do or can you run a full tank of it? I guess my question would be "Is it safe to run a tank of that stuff every once in a while"?
I run straight VP100 but I had the car tuned for 96 octane VP100 motor rating is 96.
http://www.vpracingfuels.com/vp100%2...?lnum=16768446
But I had also ran it straight before the tune and could still tell the difference.
Autobot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2010, 06:22 PM   #44
2ndgenz28
Thread Killer
 
2ndgenz28's Avatar
 
Drives: All Black
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NWO Toledo Area
Posts: 4,720
Send a message via ICQ to 2ndgenz28 Send a message via AIM to 2ndgenz28 Send a message via Yahoo to 2ndgenz28
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phantom.5SS View Post
so thats all I run in the Camaro...93 No Ethanol------$4.00 a gallon.
Any chance you want to buy a bridge???


$4 gas has been long gone here
2ndgenz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2010, 08:42 PM   #45
13 ZL1
 
13 ZL1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 IOM ZL1
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Manteca CA
Posts: 683
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bogey99 View Post
I found a place that has 100 at the pump too. A previously mentioned by others, would running a few gallons of it be the practical thing to do or can you run a full tank of it? I guess my question would be "Is it safe to run a tank of that stuff every once in a while"?
I think the best thing to do would be to add a few gallons of 100 with the balance at 91 on every fill up. I calculated that 4 gallons of 100 plus 14.8 gallons of 91 averages to 92.8.
13 ZL1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2010, 08:46 PM   #46
04Ram2500Hemi

 
Drives: 04 Ram 2500 & 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Missoula, Montana
Posts: 1,301
What does the owners manual say about the SS? I won't be getting my Camaro until some time in April (it all depends on bow long it takes one I order it March 1st).
04Ram2500Hemi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2010, 09:00 PM   #47
IceCreamGuys
 
IceCreamGuys's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 IOM 2SS/RS
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 43
High Elevation

We are at about 6700' here in Wyoming. 91 is about as high a grade fuel as I ever see, without going to the Airport or a racing shop.
IceCreamGuys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2010, 09:15 PM   #48
JohnInSoCal
 
Drives: RJT L99 500HP
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 535
Quote:
Originally Posted by 04Ram2500Hemi View Post
What does the owners manual say about the SS?
it says to use 91 octane, it's what the cars are tuned for from the factory. Using 93 or 100 octane won't hurt but won't give it any more HP or make it faster.
JohnInSoCal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2010, 09:18 PM   #49
lee

 
lee's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2ss/rs
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,016
whats wrong with 87?
lee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2010, 10:56 PM   #50
Madcat0911
 
Madcat0911's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 1SS/RS
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 243
Quote:
Originally Posted by lee View Post
whats wrong with 87?
You lose power, and you might get some knocking.

That lose power part is the part that convinces me to not put the cheap stuff in my baby.
__________________
Camaro 1SS/RS, Manual Transmission, BA package, Transformers package
---------------------
Madcat0911 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 07:35 AM   #51
04Ram2500Hemi

 
Drives: 04 Ram 2500 & 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Missoula, Montana
Posts: 1,301
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnInSoCal View Post
it says to use 91 octane, it's what the cars are tuned for from the factory. Using 93 or 100 octane won't hurt but won't give it any more HP or make it faster.
This will be the second vehicle I've purchased that the owners manual tells you to not run the 87. I have to run 89 in my Hemi, and now 91 in my Camaro. LOL- I never get to run the cheap gas like I put in my wife's Honda Pilot!
04Ram2500Hemi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 09:15 AM   #52
brtaus
 
brtaus's Avatar
 
Drives: None
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 574
Quote:
Originally Posted by Madcat0911 View Post
You lose power, and you might get some knocking.

That lose power part is the part that convinces me to not put the cheap stuff in my baby.
I was never really a big believer in the differenece in grades of gas until this last fill up. Keep in mind, I have used 91 since I got my car but about 3 months ago, I started using Chevron or Shell exclusively.

Anyway, I was not able to go to my normal Chevron station, so I had to fill up at a Circle K. I still filled up with 91 octance, but I have to say the difference in how my car runs with Chevron to what is in there now is night and day. My car runs a bit rougher, idles a bit rougher and just doesn't feel the same.

I can say this, I will only use Chevron or Shell gas from now on, even if I have to fill up with a half tank remaining.
brtaus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 10:47 AM   #53
mmongi7
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LT
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 229
Send a message via AIM to mmongi7
Chevron Supreme! Always get the best that you can.
__________________
Camaro 5 Fest here I come!
mmongi7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 10:53 AM   #54
brtaus
 
brtaus's Avatar
 
Drives: None
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 574
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmongi7 View Post
Chevron Supreme! Always get the best that you can.
Will never get anything different from now on.
brtaus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 11:43 AM   #55
TooCool5


 
TooCool5's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 1LS 3.6 LLT V6 325 HP
Join Date: May 2009
Location: LS
Posts: 4,244
Search search its so easy.
__________________
2010 Camaro Auto, Inferno Orange, Titanium Interior, Gearhead Wheels AIRAID CAI
TooCool5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2010, 11:55 AM   #56
MiniMedic361
 
Drives: 2010 2SS Summit White Camaro
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 10
A fuel with a higher octane rating can be run at a higher compression ratio without causing detonation. Compression is directly related to power, so engines that require higher octane usually deliver more motive power. Engine power is a function of the fuel, as well as the engine design, and is related to octane rating of the fuel. Power is limited by the maximum amount of fuel-air mixture that can be forced into the combustion chamber. When the throttle is partially open, only a small fraction of the total available power is produced because the manifold is operating at pressures far below atmospheric. In this case, the octane requirement is far lower than when the throttle is opened fully and the manifold pressure increases to atmospheric pressure, or higher in the case of supercharged or turbocharged engines. Many high-performance engines are designed to operate with a high maximum compression, and thus demand high-octane premium gasoline. A common misconception is that power output or fuel mileage can be improved by burning higher octane fuel than a particular engine was designed for. The power output of an engine depends in part on the energy density of its fuel, but similar fuels with different octane ratings have similar density. Since switching to a higher octane fuel does not add any more hydrocarbon content or oxygen, the engine cannot produce more power. However, burning fuel with a lower octane rating than required by the engine often reduces power output and efficiency one way or another. If the engine begins to detonate (knock), that reduces power and efficiency for the reasons stated above. Many modern car engines feature a knock sensor – a small piezoelectric microphone which detects knock, and then sends a signal to the engine control unit to retard the ignition timing. Retarding the ignition timing reduces the tendency to detonate, but also reduces power output and fuel efficiency (Thanks Wikipedia!!!)
MiniMedic361 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nitrous System ?????s PoleCat2SSRS2010 Forced Induction - V8 29 12-08-2010 06:55 PM
Stock Injectors vs Magnuson Kit Injectors Mark-HD Forced Induction - V8 24 01-27-2010 09:04 PM
Why i think you cant do a Dyno in the same day 2SSRS@Gen5diy Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 123 10-22-2009 08:37 PM
Camaro ls3 news...true or false? Dark Knight Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 74 06-05-2008 06:29 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.