![]() |
![]() |
#57 |
![]() Drives: 1999 Z28 1983 Z28 Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: City of Champions,MA
Posts: 615
|
Agreed why doesn't everyone just run out and rack up 100K miles then do whatever the hell you want after that.
Stop blameing GM for wanting to void warranties. They are a buisness that has a marginal profit on each car. They don't want to be spending money because some idiot messed up a car that GM has to warranty for 100K miles.
__________________
Current cars:
![]() 99 Z28 06 Silverado 14 Silverado |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 | |
![]() Drives: 98 Camaro Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Grand Blanc MI
Posts: 38
|
Warranties of GMPP Exhaust, Headers, Air Intakes
This is JohnnyCamaro aka John Cox from Chevy Accessories. I want to clear up some confusion and assure you that the GMPP parts do uphold the vehicle warranties and that the parts have been tested and validated to ensure they can uphold to the vehicle warranty standards. All of these parts go through significant testing standards which by the way, do drive costs, but ensure that we sell a high quality part that we are willing to stand by. As to why other aftermarket performance parts will void your warranty, it is simple. GM has not done this detailed performance testing on the product and does not know the limits that the aftermarket supplier designed to. Our engineers are extremely good at identifying cause and effect of different parameters and we use this testing to help us develop our own systems. For those of you who dont know our Exhaust and Headers are designed by GM and produced by Borla who's name speaks for itself in the industry.
Thanks, JohnnyCamaro Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 | |
![]() Drives: 98 Camaro Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Grand Blanc MI
Posts: 38
|
Claim not true
The GMPP Exhaust and Headers are actually Designed and developed by GM. The supplier for this is Borla. We do not take Borla parts and logo them. We develop our own systems, working with GM Engineers and our supplier Borla. If we were to ever logo other people's parts we do a licensing contract. None of these parts are licensed parts.
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#60 |
Account Suspended
Drives: SuperCharged 2SS/RS IOM MN6 Join Date: May 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 5,094
|
![]() another "perceived" knowledge war going on here. The bottom line, if you want to know for sure, get it from the horse's mouth. Not from the guy who makes the horse shoe, or the guy who rides the horse, or the guy who shoots steroids into it. You buy GM parts to install on GM cars, your warranty is still golden. Filters are not going to void warranty. After-market performance add-ons likely will, just depends what the horse says.... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#61 | |
![]() Drives: CTS/CAMARO Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SEMA/PERF INDUSTRY GUY
Posts: 488
|
Quote:
It's really great to have you posting here. You are right I made an assumption on the Borla/GMPP headers. I apologize. But my assumption was made, erroneously, because I do know, for a fact that the 1236693 GMPP head is an Edelbrock 60459. Only different are logos. The BBC 502/502 is an Edelbrock Performer RPM, with GM logos and numbered runners. The 572 crate engine comes with an MSD 85551 distributor. Not that any of this is a bad thing. The parts were vetted by GM engineers and why re-invent the wheel. I will refrain from posting about any part that I'm not 100% sure about. Again, my apologies. . |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#62 |
![]() Drives: 2010 2SS RS L99 Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: BUTLER, PA
Posts: 531
|
the whole point of this thread is that if GM makes a shorty header, or an exhaust or CAI it is virtually identical to other aftermarket manufacturers as far HP and Torque, why will it void your warranty? what if GMPP headers produce more HP than ARH? Is warranty safe? These parts are bolt on, there is no big difference in performance, so why GM are yours the only ones that don't void the warranty?????????????????????
'Our engineers are extremely good at identifying cause and effect of different parameters and we use this testing to help us develop our own systems.' Sorry, why do the A/F ratio's vary so much on (at least the) L99's, are these 'different Peramiters"!!!!!!!! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#63 | |
Too Much FUN!!
Drives: RUBY!! 2010 2SS/RS RJT Camaro Join Date: May 2009
Location: Parker Cnty, TX
Posts: 621
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() I'm sorry, but I don't give a hoot about increasing HP, gas milage, performance, any of that... just want a decent sounding deep growl from my car. Are there sound clips of it somewhere? THANKS in advance y'all! ![]()
__________________
RJT / Gray Leather / 2SS / RS / Sunroof / Auto / 20" Polished
1100 (original order date): Order# NKCJ8P 05.09.09 2000 (dealer received allocation): 7/28/09 2500 (order preferenced): 3000 (accepted to production): 7/30/09 - TPW 8/17/09 3300 (scheduled for prod) 8/5/09 THANKS Viz!! 3400 (broadcast): 8/15/09 3800 (produced):8/22/09 - #39,334 4000/4B00 (available to ship/bayed): 4200 (shipped): 8/24/09 4300 (intermediate, may be multiple): 5000 (at dealer):09/03/09 6000 (delivered to customer): 9/3/09 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#64 | |
![]() Drives: 1999 Z28 1983 Z28 Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: City of Champions,MA
Posts: 615
|
Quote:
__________________
Current cars:
![]() 99 Z28 06 Silverado 14 Silverado |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#65 | |
![]() Drives: Future Camaro Owner Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: LA
Posts: 12
|
Quote:
Why? Because they designed the part, they tested it for however many miles needed to be tested to be CARB approved and they are willing to stand behind there part. Where as if you go aftermarket NONE of the companies are as big as GM and almost none of them have the same resources as GM to test these parts on a Camaro for 100k miles. That is why GM won't honor your warranty if you go aftermarket you have no idea how the part was tested where as the GMPP parts are safe for your engine. Its as simple as that. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#66 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
|
Quote:
The GMPP "regular version" axle back exhaust is a litle more tame, but has a nice low sound to it. There a sound clips of both floating around. But the video's really don't do either exhaust justice. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#67 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
|
Quote:
The GMPP "regular version" axle back exhaust is a litle more tame, but has a nice low sound to it. This thread of mine has pictures and a video clip of the GMPP "off road" axle back. http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showth...ight=GMPP+road There more sound clips of both floating around. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#68 | |
![]() Drives: CTS/CAMARO Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SEMA/PERF INDUSTRY GUY
Posts: 488
|
Quote:
All this talk about A/F's and power comparisons has no bearing on the emissions violation side. If it doesn't have an EO and it modifies an emission component (not the output just the part) it's not legal. That's why the fine print says "Off Road Use Only". |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#69 |
![]() Drives: 2006 EVO MR - 390 @ wheels Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 384
|
If that's the case...what emissions component is moved, altered, or removed with an axle back?
I always thought that so long as an emissions component existed then the emissions output would stay intact and therefore legal. Hmmm..
__________________
2010 2SS/RS 6spd manual -- Victory Red / Black Leather
1100, Preliminary order accepted 7/27/09 2000, Order accepted by GM 8/13/09 3000, Order accepted by production control 8/18/2009 TPW 9/07/2009 3300, Order scheduled for production 8/24/2009 3400, Order broadcast 9/1/2009 3800, Order produced 9/11/2009 4200, Shipped 9/11/2009 5000, Delivered to the dealer |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#70 |
![]() Drives: CTS/CAMARO Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SEMA/PERF INDUSTRY GUY
Posts: 488
|
None, Axle backs or Cat-Backs as the industry refers to them are fine. They are a stock replacement part. You just can't relocate a catalytic converter or O sensor.(or turn it off). The only problem you might have is if your state has a noise (db limit) ordinance. Tons of dealers have sold and installed cat-backs. It's been a staple of the truck market for years.
I always thought that so long as an emissions component existed then the emissions output would stay intact and therefore legal. Hmmm.. That used to be the case. Another loophole they've closed. Not you cannot even relocate them. CA now has a catalytic converter spec! Most cats (hi-flo) sold in previously in CA are illegal starting this year. |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
OK...I'm starting a better V6 exhaust examples thread!! | KMPrenger | Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 612 | 09-06-2024 08:00 AM |
Anybody Spray'n their SS yet - nitrous ? | WeeZee | Forced Induction - V8 | 37 | 12-29-2012 09:56 PM |
Nitrous System ?????s | PoleCat2SSRS2010 | Forced Induction - V8 | 29 | 12-08-2010 05:55 PM |
Tune? CAI? Exhaust? | Canuck5thGen | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 12 | 08-01-2009 02:23 PM |
Turbocharge your way to efficiency.....and power! | Mr. Wyndham | Forced Induction - V8 | 20 | 07-06-2008 12:46 PM |