Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
KPM Fuel Systems
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Technical Camaro Topics > Camaro Issues / Problems | Warranty Discussions | TSB and Recalls


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-06-2016, 09:57 AM   #57
lkurek
 
Drives: 2015 CAMARO
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Illinois
Posts: 168
Wow....that sucks. A lot. However...all GM has to do is document that ANY modification was made from the factory specs, to a failed system, and that will void your warranty. Its pretty common knowledge that anytime you make any modification while your car is under warranty...you take the chance of losing coverage. Apparently the dealer you took it to wasnt working in your best interest. They clearly took pictures to document the modifications, and didnt give you a heads up to return it to stock. Elite my ass....more like screw you customer and then lie to you.

Frankly, even if you took them to court, AND you can make the case that the modifications had nothing to do with the failure (which they clearly did not), doesnt matter......just the fact that you made the modifications is enough for them to deny warranty on the drivetrain. You should still be covered on all the other systems in the car (ie you cant be denied coverage on your myLink, for the catch can), but the engine, possibly the trans and rear axle are now not covered.

Hate to be the guy that pisses in your punchbowl, but Ive dealt with the legal side of these things for a long time.....and you dont have a legal case, even if you have a technical one.

Only thing to do now....is pull the motor and build yourself a nice forged stroker
lkurek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 10:00 AM   #58
CamaroinCLE
 
CamaroinCLE's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 CRT LT
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 151
and this is why I do not mod a car that is under Warranty. Too risky...
CamaroinCLE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 10:03 AM   #59
lkurek
 
Drives: 2015 CAMARO
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Illinois
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrtowman View Post
C'mon guys. This isnt rocket science. Of course they are gonna deny it. Its just like insurance companies paying out claims. The burden of proof is on you to prove that you are right. Fight back. They know that this is on them but until you put the proper pressure on them, they arent going to cave in.

If you do have to get a lawyer, include their fees in your suit. You will not be out of anything because you will win.
No, you will lose, and be out even more money.
lkurek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 10:04 AM   #60
rebelyell22


 
rebelyell22's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 SIM 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Tupelo, MS
Posts: 5,902
Talk to Scott Settlemire? He has to know somebody...
__________________
2011 2SS/RS built 8/24/10
rebelyell22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 10:04 AM   #61
68rssscamaro
Camaro: A Legend Reborn!!
 
68rssscamaro's Avatar
 
Drives: SOLD: 12 2SS/RS LS3 45th
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: NY
Posts: 743
Quote:
Originally Posted by lkurek View Post
Wow....that sucks. A lot. However...all GM has to do is document that ANY modification was made from the factory specs, to a failed system, and that will void your warranty. Its pretty common knowledge that anytime you make any modification while your car is under warranty...you take the chance of losing coverage. Apparently the dealer you took it to wasnt working in your best interest. They clearly took pictures to document the modifications, and didnt give you a heads up to return it to stock. Elite my ass....more like screw you customer and then lie to you.

Frankly, even if you took them to court, AND you can make the case that the modifications had nothing to do with the failure (which they clearly did not), doesnt matter......just the fact that you made the modifications is enough for them to deny warranty on the drivetrain. You should still be covered on all the other systems in the car (ie you cant be denied coverage on your myLink, for the catch can), but the engine, possibly the trans and rear axle are now not covered.

Hate to be the guy that pisses in your punchbowl, but Ive dealt with the legal side of these things for a long time.....and you dont have a legal case, even if you have a technical one.

Only thing to do now....is pull the motor and build yourself a nice forged stroker

You must work for GM.

http://www.edmunds.com/auto-warranty...-warranty.html
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]





68rssscamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 10:05 AM   #62
qcman

 
qcman's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro 2SS RDP Tuned L99
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Ottawa, Canada eh?
Posts: 1,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moto-Mojo View Post
I thought the "new"(er) Camaro's had a 'new and improved' oil pump? Maybe this thread answers the question but is it still a failure point of the LS based engine? Especially from GM's warranty standpoint, why make a hi-perf motor with a suspect oil pump? Because you can afford better counsel than John Q. Public?
I don't think it was an actual oil pump problem but rather an issue of debris remaining in the block after machining. The debris was blocking the pick up tube and causing the the pumps to fail or something like that.

So unless the machining has improved which I don't believe has been confirmed it could very well plague all of our V8 cars especially the LS3's.
qcman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 10:07 AM   #63
rebelyell22


 
rebelyell22's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 SIM 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Tupelo, MS
Posts: 5,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by qcman View Post
I don't think it was an actualoil pump problem but rather an issue of debris remaining in the block after machining. The debris was blocking the pick up tube and causing the the pumps to fail or something like that.

So unless the machining has improved which I don't believe has been confirmed it could very well plague all of our V8 cars especially the LS3's.
Yep. Happened to my first engine.
__________________
2011 2SS/RS built 8/24/10
rebelyell22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 10:10 AM   #64
DILLIGAF
 
DILLIGAF's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 ZL1 M6 Rapid Blue
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Western NY
Posts: 357
I spent about $6000 replacing the 2.0T engine in my Cadillac ATS. Had a downpipe and tune installed. one day it began running rough, so not thinking it was anything serious i dropped it off at the dealer. Turns out there was a hole in one of the pistons, and warranty replacement refused because of modifications. Two weeks of fighting, BBB meetings, numerous calls, it didnt matter. Even the BBB took the side of GM.

Have the car fixed out of pocket, keep all receipts then take it to the BBB. They will offer you half the cost. TAKE IT. I didnt because i thought i had a case.
__________________
2023 Rapid Blue ZL1 M6
| Corsa NPP | Corsa Carbon Fiber Intake | Hardwired Valentine1 Gen 2 | Pro Clip Phone Mount |
DILLIGAF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 10:24 AM   #65
Stormcloak
slower than you
 
Stormcloak's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 C6 Z06
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: NY
Posts: 668
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroinCLE View Post
and this is why I do not mod a car that is under Warranty. Too risky...
Modding under warranty = chance of recourse depending how things are handled

Modding outside of warranty = zero recourse.

If someone is afraid of the inherent risk, I don't see how waiting does much of anything to suddenly instill confidence.
__________________
Stormcloak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 10:24 AM   #66
68rssscamaro
Camaro: A Legend Reborn!!
 
68rssscamaro's Avatar
 
Drives: SOLD: 12 2SS/RS LS3 45th
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: NY
Posts: 743
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=236811
__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]





68rssscamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 10:25 AM   #67
1Coopgt

 
1Coopgt's Avatar
 
Drives: All Black 2012 1LS
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Rochester,NY
Posts: 2,042
Quote:
Originally Posted by Iron Lung Jimmy View Post
Guy had the oil pump fail and GM is blaming the catch can so won't cover it under warranty.
That sucks . I agree Gm has to prove the CC was the problem . Which I don't think they can.
__________________
Mods, K&N CAI ,VTC , GM Perf Axleback Exhaust, Elite Eng CC and CSS, GM Strut Tower Brace,Carbon Fiber Anvil Spoiler,ASC T5 Splitter,Gen5diy Foglight kit.
1Coopgt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 10:29 AM   #68
Moto-Mojo
Fast Cars and Old Guitars
 
Moto-Mojo's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 2SS RS (L99, baby!)
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: N. CA
Posts: 4,217
Quote:
Originally Posted by qcman View Post
I don't think it was an actual oil pump problem but rather an issue of debris remaining in the block after machining. The debris was blocking the pick up tube and causing the the pumps to fail or something like that.

So unless the machining has improved which I don't believe has been confirmed it could very well plague all of our V8 cars especially the LS3's.
Would changing the 'break-in' oil at 500 miles and changing it two more times in the first 3000 miles possibly have drained a few chips? Seems like it could've helped.
__________________
“I don’t want to belong to any club that would have me as a member.” - Groucho Marx
Moto-Mojo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 10:29 AM   #69
GrandAmGT
 
GrandAmGT's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 1LT & 2016 Cadillac CTS V6
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Danville, Virginia
Posts: 376
The OP's post was extremely long but did I miss the part where he said the engine is ruined? I thought he only suspected an issue with the oil pump? If only the pump needs replacing at this point, it seems practical for the OP to pay to fix it now and then sue to recover the costs of the repairs. This way he'll get his car back ASAP.
GrandAmGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2016, 10:30 AM   #70
Criticalmass
 
Drives: 2014 Ford Mustang GT Premium
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 269
Quote:
Originally Posted by lkurek View Post
No, you will lose, and be out even more money.

Get a lawyer. you NEED to at LEAST SPEAK to a lawyer. The people on this forum do not have law degrees. I have been through this and know several who have, every single case was settled out of court to the paintiff's satisfaction.

If everything is as YOU say and they aren't claiming the Air Intake was faulty instead, this is an open and shut case. Do not stop to collect $200.00 do not talk to anyone else, do not make any decisions until you have consulted an attorney.
Criticalmass is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.