Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-07-2009, 03:33 PM   #57
Dan3
Captain of the Failboat
 
Dan3's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 IBM Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: USAF Seymour Johnson- Goldsboro, NC
Posts: 405
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1320junkie View Post
I'll see your and raise you a
__________________
2010 Camaro 2SS - Imperial Blue w/Black Leather Interior
Ordered - 22 June 2009
Produced - 10 August 2009 : #34143
Delivered - 25 August 2009
Dan3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 04:05 PM   #58
DntWrryBeHappy21
Patiently Waiting...
 
DntWrryBeHappy21's Avatar
 
Drives: whatevers in the driveway atm
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 403
Send a message via AIM to DntWrryBeHappy21
So to the OP basically the more torque the better =) and of course the more hp

but to clear it up for myself:

torque is needed to get the motor to start working faster while horsepower is needed to make it continue moving faster?
__________________


One day....
DntWrryBeHappy21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 04:21 PM   #59
chevy454
 
chevy454's Avatar
 
Drives: '69 Yenko Camaro - 11.73 @ 118
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by THUMPER20X View Post
I always found the easiest way to understand is think of a door. Torque is near the hinge (high pressure) and HP is near the edge of the door (Speed) Theres a saying "Torque wins races, HP sells cars"
I don't think that's accurate...case in point, an NHRA Stock or Super/Stock Pontiac 455. The 455s are generally torque monsters, so if "torque wins races" then these thing should be the King of the Hill, but they're not...to get them to et/mph, the Pontiac guys sacrifice tq #s and *cheat* the rpm range further up, so they can use the hp to benefit from the mechanical advantage of steeper gearing. That's how the old school Z/28s compete in S/S, they're waaaay down on tq, but they spin them to the moon (9k-10k)...

If you've ever been on a dyno, and played with the accelleration rate, then you know that if you slowly accellerate the engine you'll make more power than with a faster rate, but it doesn't translate to the race track...
chevy454 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 05:11 PM   #60
MontyCarlo

 
MontyCarlo's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2LT/RS auto IBM
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,255
Quote:
Originally Posted by DntWrryBeHappy21 View Post
So to the OP basically the more torque the better =) and of course the more hp

but to clear it up for myself:

torque is needed to get the motor to start working faster while horsepower is needed to make it continue moving faster?
To put DG's equation into English, horsepower comes from torque multiplied by engine speed. If you have good torque, then high horsepower means you'll keep having good torque at high engine speed but low horsepower means the engine can't get very high RPMs.

And to forget English and go back to equations, T is proportional to M(mass)*A(acceleration), but P(power)=M*A*V(velocity).
__________________
FAQs:
1. No, I do not have any strong opinions about the Monte Carlo.
2. Yes, I know what my name looks like.
3. Yes, but the medication helps immensely.

2LT/RS IBM/gray #21,895 ordered April 21st, delivered July 3rd
MontyCarlo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 01:38 AM   #61
PieNsky

 
PieNsky's Avatar
 
Drives: Victory Red 1LS
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Louisville,KY
Posts: 1,928
[QUOTE=5thGenCamaroChick;992746]
So based on this am I to assume the lower torque number is better?


UMMMM.....Well.....Bigger I heard was always better
PieNsky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 03:07 AM   #62
THUMPER20X
GM fix my PAINT U suck!
 
THUMPER20X's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black 1SS/RS 6Spd
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Great Red North
Posts: 1,856
Quote:
Originally Posted by chevy454 View Post
I don't think that's accurate...case in point, an NHRA Stock or Super/Stock Pontiac 455. The 455s are generally torque monsters, so if "torque wins races" then these thing should be the King of the Hill, but they're not...to get them to et/mph, the Pontiac guys sacrifice tq #s and *cheat* the rpm range further up, so they can use the hp to benefit from the mechanical advantage of steeper gearing. That's how the old school Z/28s compete in S/S, they're waaaay down on tq, but they spin them to the moon (9k-10k)...

If you've ever been on a dyno, and played with the accelleration rate, then you know that if you slowly accellerate the engine you'll make more power than with a faster rate, but it doesn't translate to the race track...
I didnt make the saying up lol. I just heard it.
__________________
THUMPER20X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 12:10 PM   #63
HDDAN

 
HDDAN's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 1SS 2007 HD FLSTC
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 1,510
There are a lot of factors to winning a race. The NHRA used to use the horsepower to weight ratio to determine the stock classes. The way to increase torque is to increase the brake mean effective pressure. You do this by enhancing the engine such as increasing the compression ratio. People that talk about torquey engines are usually talking about engines that make their torque peak at a low RPM. If you increase the RPM of the torque peak (such as with a hot cam), you also increase the HP. The formula of torque x RPM divided by 5252 is the right one for horsepower. Torque is a measurement of turning force. The more times you apply it, the more HP. For example, A Harley Twin cam 96 makes about 90 pound feet of torque at about 4500 rpm and makes about 70 HP. A Ninja ZX12R makes about the same torque number but does it at about 12,000 rpm making roughly 180 HP. The engines with the higher torque peak need to be reved higher and at lower RPM's do not have the grunt af an engine like the Harley's low speed engine. With a low speed engine with a low RPM torque peak and a heavy flywheel, you will fell immediate acceleration when you push the pedal down. It will run out of steam quicker than the high speed engine. The high speed engine with a couple of downshifts to get near it's higher RPM torque peak will crush the slower turning engine. A good example of the high speed engine was the 302 CI Z-28 race engines of the nineteen sixties. They were giant killers.
HDDAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 12:29 PM   #64
chevy454
 
chevy454's Avatar
 
Drives: '69 Yenko Camaro - 11.73 @ 118
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Missouri
Posts: 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by HDDAN View Post
The NHRA used to use the horsepower to weight ratio to determine the stock classes.
They still do...our '69 carries a factor of 8.06 (lbs per factored hp) in Stock, while the NHRA has yet to release the factor for the '10...

Quote:
A good example of the high speed engine was the 302 CI Z-28 race engines of the nineteen sixties. They were giant killers.
Good example...
chevy454 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 12:56 PM   #65
SlingShot


 
SlingShot's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 ZL1 - #670
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Seminole, Fl.
Posts: 8,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by HDDAN View Post
A good example of the high speed engine was the 302 CI Z-28 race engines of the nineteen sixties. They were giant killers.
Part of the 302 design that made them awesome, was the fact they were "oversquare" engines. The oversquare engine is one that is designed with a larger bore than stroke. With this design they were able to maintain mandated engine size. Also with the smaller stroke the engines reached their max power and rpm faster, and were able to keep it there longer without the engine blowing. To this day the NASCAR engines are designed the same way.
__________________
SlingShot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 01:09 PM   #66
HDDAN

 
HDDAN's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 1SS 2007 HD FLSTC
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 1,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlingShot View Post
Part of the 302 design that made them awesome, was the fact they were "oversquare" engines. The oversquare engine is one that is designed with a larger bore than stroke. With this design they were able to maintain mandated engine size. Also with the smaller stroke the engines reached their max power and rpm faster, and were able to keep it there longer without the engine blowing. To this day the NASCAR engines are designed the same way.
Yes, with the oversquare engine with a short stroke Chevy was able to move the torque curve up because the engines would safely rev to higher speeds. This is because of piston speed. On a longer stroke engine, the pistons must move faster to cover the longer distance of the stroke per revoloution. The limit of when things start comming apart is about 4,300 feet per minute. Like I said earlier, if you have the same amount of torque at a higher RPM, you get more HP.
HDDAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 01:18 PM   #67
Banshee
Institutionally Insane
 
Banshee's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 IOM 2SS/RS 1LE
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Detroit MI
Posts: 2,115
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5thGenCamaroChick View Post
Can someone explain torque to me in simple terms?
"simple terms"?

This was the only question the OP had. Hell, I am confused now..
__________________
It's got a cop motor, a 440 cubic inch plant, it's got cop tires, cop suspension, cop shocks. It's a model made before catalytic converters so it'll run good on regular gas. What do you say, is it the new Bluesmobile or what?
Banshee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 01:25 PM   #68
SlingShot


 
SlingShot's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 ZL1 - #670
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Seminole, Fl.
Posts: 8,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Banshee View Post
"simple terms"?

This was the only question the OP had. Hell, I am confused now..

In simple terms torque, by definition is a twisting or turning effort or force....
__________________
SlingShot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 01:51 PM   #69
Banshee
Institutionally Insane
 
Banshee's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 IOM 2SS/RS 1LE
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Detroit MI
Posts: 2,115
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlingShot View Post
In simple terms torque, by definition is a twisting or turning effort or force....
Glad we are back on topic...short and sweet.
__________________
It's got a cop motor, a 440 cubic inch plant, it's got cop tires, cop suspension, cop shocks. It's a model made before catalytic converters so it'll run good on regular gas. What do you say, is it the new Bluesmobile or what?
Banshee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 02:03 PM   #70
Susantroy1
To All Veterans
 
Susantroy1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2LT RS Inferno Orange
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New Port Richey
Posts: 471
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5thGenCamaroChick View Post
Can someone explain torque to me in simple terms?
You Guys are way to boring...... Camarochick, Torque is the amount of force that I use to turn my neck an stare at a hottie like you cruising down the boulevard in Her hot A## Camaro Horsepower is what I use to catch up to you See simple.....
Susantroy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Horsepower V.S. Torque Milk 1027 Wiki 0 09-15-2009 12:19 AM
Torque Converters Milk 1027 Wiki 0 08-12-2009 07:31 PM
Bored so Ill ask a speculation question :) BLACK SUNSHINE Camaro Price | Ordering | Tracking | Dealers Discussions 13 02-12-2009 12:16 PM
IRS question 454lsxss Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 5 08-30-2008 10:06 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.