![]() |
|
|
#57 |
![]() Drives: 2023 SLE Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 315
|
Wrong, my '98 GT dyno'd higher than that and it was rated at 225hp, 35 less than the 99-04 which made an honest 260. Those cars will be 40hp down to the Camaro but will be about 400 pounds lighter. Also, not all that many are stock anymore and I will almost guarantee you one that challenges you at a stoplight or dragstrip isn't. Don't think for one minute that V6 Camaro owners won't get all they can handle and probably more from 99-04 Mustang GTs (so long as the road stays straight). It's an understatement to say that I prefer the new Camaro to the current Mustang (even though I have owned 3) but facts are facts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#58 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() Anyway, like I said...the Mustang would pull ahead pretty quickly, but the V6 Camaro would have to be pretty snappy... Anyway, now I think I was probably reading the chart wrong, having the Mustang's lines transposed.
__________________
Removing weight has surprisingly little effect on fuel economy
Engine break-in procedure | Gear ratios 2002 GMC Sierra 4x4 5.3 (190,000 miles and going strong) 1980 Buick Lesabre family heirloom with 36,000 miles 2008 Volkswagen Rabbit 2 door I5-2.5 5spd DD lease Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#59 |
![]() Drives: 2023 SLE Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 315
|
The graphs I posted are RWHP numbers measured on a chassis dyno, not rated BHP numbers. You're trying to compare the Camaro's BHP numbers to the Mustang's RWHP numbers, it doesn't work like that. Notice that both engines peak at about 260 hp which is what a 300hp engine would make measured at the wheels after drivetrain losses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#60 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
So, in the one you posted...which of the Mustang's lines is torque, and which is HP?
__________________
Removing weight has surprisingly little effect on fuel economy
Engine break-in procedure | Gear ratios 2002 GMC Sierra 4x4 5.3 (190,000 miles and going strong) 1980 Buick Lesabre family heirloom with 36,000 miles 2008 Volkswagen Rabbit 2 door I5-2.5 5spd DD lease Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#61 | |
![]() Drives: Cavalier RS Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Jordan, NY
Posts: 569
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#62 | |
|
cheap plastic member
Drives: Mazda6s Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Arlington
Posts: 216
|
Quote:
Like Ford never made anything that was a fat pig.A little over 10 years ago, the blue oval boys were crying because the 302 Fox-Box went bye-bye and was replaced by a heavier Mustang with a version of the Modular that was rated between 215-225 hp. LT1 F-bodies were in the business of kicking Mustang ass and business was good. Hell, even pathetic L32 3.4 Camaros and Firebirds were capable of stomping out Essex V6 powered Mustangs in spite of the Mustang's 400cc displacement advantage. And the current Mustang's V6 is not exactly a jewel. It's a dumpy SUV engine. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
Outbursts like that will make sweet victory (or near-victory) that much more satisfying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#64 |
![]() Drives: Cavalier RS Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Jordan, NY
Posts: 569
|
i think he is just pissed his GT didn't come with 400hp... lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
#65 |
![]() Drives: 1999 Z28, 2007 Saurn Aura Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: texas
Posts: 51
|
I would have to say after seeing some g8 gt's in the 12's with just a tune and few lowly bolt on's, not really making tons of power, weight on this platform isn't a big an issue as you would think it would be, plus given the fact that they stated that the SS camaro would run mid 13's in the 1/4 when the heavier g8 gt runs that or better stock down 60 hp from what the SS will have, we know GM is underrating soemthing one way or another. So I would assume(you know what that does though), that more than likely the v6 camaro which weighs even less by another 200 lbs, will probably actually run a high 13 in the quarter, I'd say 13.8-13.9, which is one hell of a respectable number, better than the old LT1's. The damn Mustang GT's aren't going to be that much faster and sure as hell won't handle or ride as well,(or look as good, or be as comfortable, etc etc
)...you get my point.Oh yea, just seen the post about the G8 GXP, you know it will be faster than advertised, that mean 12's in the 1/4 folks and 4.5 sec 0-60 times, and to think the SS will be lighter and with more power I love the underrating they give their cars these days
Last edited by havocnmayhem2005; 08-02-2008 at 12:41 AM. Reason: forgot something |
|
|
|
|
|
#66 | |
![]() Drives: Cavalier RS Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Jordan, NY
Posts: 569
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#67 |
![]() Drives: 1999 Z28, 2007 Saurn Aura Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: texas
Posts: 51
|
that's exactly what I was getting at LS9
![]() EDIT: the more I think about this the more I would so get a V6 camaro when they come out. haha |
|
|
|
|
|
#68 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 1999 camaro rs Join Date: May 2008
Location: phoenix, arizona
Posts: 1,160
|
Slightly off topic here but i have always wanted to run my girlfriends dad 2006 convertable mustang vs my 1999 rs theres is completely stock mine has a performance air filter,performance exhuast, and royal purple performance oil wich i belive all them added up 12hp so i have 212hp he has 210hp mine is t-tops theres is convertable wich gives me a big weight advantage. he is a mad ford fan im a mad chevy fan and i don't wanna embarrass my self and my camaro especially with a mustang so before i race will i have a chance? i know stock for stock im screwed but i have some upgrades and he has a big degrade (weight) could i pull off a win??
|
|
|
|
|
|
#70 | |
![]() Drives: 2011 Mustang GT, Kona, BBP, 3.73 Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Ocala, FL
Posts: 193
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| OFFICIAL 2010 Camaro Specifications (full tech specs PDF inside) | Tran | Guides, Manuals, Bulletins, Documentation Archive | 394 | 06-11-2010 07:16 PM |
| Camaro's lineup? | .Hack | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 66 | 10-13-2008 08:06 AM |
| 5.0L V8 could return in 2010 Mustang | camaro5 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 15 | 04-18-2008 07:41 PM |
| Mustang preparing for its rivals | MerF | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 132 | 08-22-2007 09:19 AM |