![]() |
|
|
#71 | |
![]() Drives: MINI Cooper S Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 284
|
Quote:
350hp just isn't enough. You can probably get that from the V6! 500hp is the competitive figure that Camaro MUST achieve to be credible. The new mustang GT (2009) will be pushing 380hp (according to the rumors) and the Challenger SRT-8 will be pushing 425hp (prolly 450 by then) so the Camaro SS really HAS to have over 450hp. They have already announced that they can get 500hp from the LS3 Block with GEN V heads on it, so its already a done deal from a technology point of view... now its just about marketing, sales, and pricing. Since its still a common block I don't expect a huge price increase. I'm pretty comfortable with the idea of a 475->550hp Camaro SS coming out in 2010 for around $40K. Probably a little less, maybe a little more. All the technology is pointing in that direction. ~LSx |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#72 | |
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#73 |
![]() Drives: MINI Cooper S Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 284
|
Ah, my apologies... I went back and re-read the original article and I realised that hadn't actually announced this as the GEN V technology. I guess I jumped the gun a bit...
My bad... I _am_ assuming this is GEN V hardware on display, just not announced as such. What IS true is that they HAVE shown a 6.2L engine making well north of 450hp in a current vehicle, using existing (and presumable reliable) hardware... this is a good sign all by itself. ~LSx |
|
|
|
|
|
#74 |
![]() Drives: 2005 Subaru WRX STi Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 91
|
The camaro engine won't be small. It would look silly under the hood. I think they designed it for big displacement, and thats what we are going to get, which will include the Gen V technology.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#75 | |
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
Quote:
I don't know if this is a response to what I said - but it could smaller. What they're saying is that with this new Gen V design - the DI naturally makes more power - so to get the same power that you get out of, say the LS3, then you would need a smaller-than-LS3 engine...you see what I'm saying? Smaller is actually better in this day - especially if you can coax more power than before - because smaller generally means better fuel economy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#76 |
|
I just like V8s
Drives: 2007 Corvette Z06 Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 919
|
The block itself is probably based on the LS3, or maybe even the same....that is as far as bore, stroke, and cylinder spacing goes. The basic dimensions.
This new GEN V engine block might still be detuned to come in at or below the output of the LS3 if the Vette still has that engine while the Camaro gets the new engine. |
|
|
|
|
|
#77 | |
![]() Drives: 2005 Subaru WRX STi Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 91
|
Quote:
I really think its going to be a big motor. But thats just what I think, and HOPE!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
I just like V8s
Drives: 2007 Corvette Z06 Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 919
|
I was thinking about that statement too
"The greater specific output provided by DIG also would allow for greater engine downsizing, thereby improving fuel economy even further" I was just thinking about the same size engine based on the generation, but I makes sense we might in fact see a smaller engine (Perhaps 5.7L or 350ci) that is still making over 400hp. That would actually be pretty cool. A smaller engine would drop a few pounds off the overall weight of the camaro too, improve the F/R weight distribution, etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
Yeah
It would be an interesting base V8...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#80 | |
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
Quote:
Too true... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
![]() Drives: 2005 Subaru WRX STi Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 91
|
Please be 500hp stock!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 | |
|
I just like V8s
Drives: 2007 Corvette Z06 Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 919
|
Just in case anyone was wondering, because I did......Displacement alone doesn't classify an engine as a "small block" or a "big block"
Here are the best definitions I have been able to come up with from http://www.chevytrucks.org/tech/block.htm Just some good general knowledge..... Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
I just like V8s
Drives: 2007 Corvette Z06 Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 919
|
As for a smaller GEN V engine going into the Camaro, I was thinking in terms of there still being a 6.2L LS3 vette out the same year.
A smaller GEN V DI engine (doesn't necessarily have to be a 350ci) would allow for GM to put the new technology in a new platform, and still keep the Vette with a bigger and likely stronger (on paper at least) engine. |
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
+1 that's what I was thinking. If they put Gen V into the 'Maro, then that's probably what they're going to do. keep the base V8 at 370 +/- hp, and then use an equivilant of the Vette engine as the Top-trim(like they've typically done)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Camaro ls3 news...true or false? | Dark Knight | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 74 | 06-05-2008 06:29 PM |