Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
KPM Fuel Systems
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-08-2010, 02:46 PM   #71
kevin2323


 
Drives: challenger
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew View Post
Actually was just rereading the Motor Trend handling article where they tested the SS and it stated the weight of the their 6 speed at 3888 so there buddy
it's funny how similar the challenger and the camaro car, yet the debate is always with the mustang. I guess it's a historical thing since the challenger hasnt been in the mix for almost 40 years but weeeeerrrrrrrreeeeeeeee baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaackkkkk
kevin2323 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2010, 02:49 PM   #72
1bad65
Banned
 
Drives: 2007 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,148
The 1/2 mile is a more accurate gauge.

I've never said the Challengers were slow, but I do say they are no match for a Camaro SS unless the Camaro needs a driver mod.
1bad65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2010, 02:50 PM   #73
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssump29 View Post
No it was the point that first he rounded up for the camaro and then down for the chally to try and make a point and when called out on it he still post false information to try and make his point. So hes not using any numbers but his own. He could go to the offical chevy site and get the CORRECT numbers.
I got those numbers from e reliable source, and that was their race where the Camaro came in last in handling? Anywho, just because you do not like the info, doesn't make it incorrect.
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2010, 02:51 PM   #74
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Really though, who that actually races these cars doesn't do at least a cold air and tune?
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2010, 02:51 PM   #75
1bad65
Banned
 
Drives: 2007 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,148
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin2323 View Post
it's funny how similar the challenger and the camaro car, yet the debate is always with the mustang.
I think it's because it's been produced without a break since 1964. No other muscle/pony car has done that.
1bad65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2010, 02:53 PM   #76
2010SLVRBULIT


 
2010SLVRBULIT's Avatar
 
Drives: G5(LLT) & C6(LS3)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: MARS
Posts: 7,525
cool..chrome rims would add a nice touch.
2010SLVRBULIT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2010, 02:54 PM   #77
1bad65
Banned
 
Drives: 2007 Mustang GT
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,148
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew View Post
Really though, who that actually races these cars doesn't do at least a cold air and tune?
Most s197 owners don't. Not sure about 5th Gen Camaro guys. But I've noticed the intake/tune doesn't really make much a difference in either V8 Challenger model like it does with the Camaros and Mustangs.

Getting an extra 20+ rwhp in a tuned s197 is common.
1bad65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2010, 02:59 PM   #78
ssump29
LOL at most people here.
 
ssump29's Avatar
 
Drives: 2005 GTO,2006 M6, 2007 300 Touring
Join Date: May 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 1,331
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew View Post
I got those numbers from e reliable source, and that was their race where the Camaro came in last in handling? Anywho, just because you do not like the info, doesn't make it incorrect.
Don't benchrace with magzines. Same motor trend you used as a backup source, had a GT500 only beating an SS by .2 of a second. Everyone knows thats far from the truth SS stands no chance against a GT500. And what about all the Mags that show the camaro handling better then the chally and mustang GT or what about the lap times which show the SS beating Nismo's and such and up there with a M3. See you use one mag to make your point which doesn't mean you are right, truth or the matter is the camaro is favorited in everything over the SRT8.

Back on topic thats a nice Chally his wife his picked up and there driveway looks great, way to go Legend and no dont think I'm a chevy fanboy or something like that. Seems how I own a 300 and BMW M6 I'm not loyal to any brand unlike you. And by the way the chally feels just as heavy as my 300 might have something to do with them being the same platform.
__________________
Number 5952. oh yeahhhhhhh
ssump29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2010, 02:59 PM   #79
kevin2323


 
Drives: challenger
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1bad65 View Post
I think it's because it's been produced without a break since 1964. No other muscle/pony car has done that.
yea that's what i said in my post above. it's history
kevin2323 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2010, 03:01 PM   #80
ViperTomcat
Banned
 
Drives: 2011 Avenger Heat
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,697
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1bad65 View Post
Most s197 owners don't. Not sure about 5th Gen Camaro guys. But I've noticed the intake/tune doesn't really make much a difference in either V8 Challenger model like it does with the Camaros and Mustangs.

Getting an extra 20+ rwhp in a tuned s197 is common.
Most R/T owners see an increase of about 12-15 RWHP with a intake and canned Diablo tune. A full custom tune from DCX depot usually sees a gain of closer to 20 with an intake and tune.

SRT's dont see as much due to their system already being better breathing and more finely tuned than the R/T.
ViperTomcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2010, 03:01 PM   #81
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1bad65 View Post
Most s197 owners don't. Not sure about 5th Gen Camaro guys. But I've noticed the intake/tune doesn't really make much a difference in either V8 Challenger model like it does with the Camaros and Mustangs.

Getting an extra 20+ rwhp in a tuned s197 is common.
The auto challengers get quite a boost, most of it is in improved shifting though. The 5 speed auto is a good transmission, it's just got very sucky tuning from the factory. I can't wait to get my 1 5.0 GT next year, 99% chance that is what I'll through, probably a base model with 3.73s and probably the Brembo brake package
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2010, 03:03 PM   #82
kevin2323


 
Drives: challenger
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssump29 View Post
Don't benchrace with magzines. Same motor trend you used as a backup source, had a GT500 only beating an SS by .2 of a second. Everyone knows thats far from the truth SS stands no chance against a GT500. And what about all the Mags that show the camaro handling better then the chally and mustang GT or what about the lap times which show the SS beating Nismo's and such and up there with a M3. See you use one mag to make your point which doesn't mean you are right, truth or the matter is the camaro is favorited in everything over the SRT8.

Back on topic thats a nice Chally his wife his picked up and there driveway looks great, way to go Legend and no dont think I'm a chevy fanboy or something like that. Seems how I own a 300 and BMW M6 I'm not loyal to any brand unlike you. And by the way the chally feels just as heavy as my 300 might have something to do with them being the same platform.
shouldnt use mags for truth, you are right, but where are the camaros favored over the challenger? in mags, same ideology applies to that.
And yes the chally should feel about as heavy as a 300 since it is on the same platform such as the camaro feels about as heavy as a g8. ive driven both cars and the challenger and camaro are very similar in the heavy feel department, but the camaro feels a bit better in turns.


and i dunno about stew but I am unbias as can be, I just like the look of the challenger more than the other 2.
kevin2323 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2010, 03:05 PM   #83
kevin2323


 
Drives: challenger
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by ViperTomcat View Post
Most R/T owners see an increase of about 12-15 RWHP with a intake and canned Diablo tune. A full custom tune from DCX depot usually sees a gain of closer to 20 with an intake and tune.

SRT's dont see as much due to their system already being better breathing and more finely tuned than the R/T.
truth,

the srt is pretty much set from factory

rt wakes up with a tune, feels more aggressive.
kevin2323 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-08-2010, 03:06 PM   #84
kevin2323


 
Drives: challenger
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2010SLVRBULIT View Post
cool..chrome rims would add a nice touch.
the classic rims that come with the RT are really nice, and have that old school look.
kevin2323 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New future challenger information The_Stache General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 25 06-09-2010 05:49 PM
2010 Camaro Exterior Stainless Steel Parts 15% off thru 2/10/10! RPI Designs Exterior Parts & Accessories 5 02-28-2010 02:28 PM
Challenger Pricing LSxcellent General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 31 12-03-2007 10:00 PM
Ontario to become home of the all-new 2008 Dodge Challenger Mr. Wyndham General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 3 08-09-2007 03:54 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.