Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
dave@hennessey
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V8


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-08-2011, 11:46 PM   #85
Dangeruss
Bayoucitymusclecars.com
 
Dangeruss's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro LSX
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 4,413
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrinderSS View Post
This may be odd, but I worked with a dude who's name was Whipple. He was gay as hell and wanted to jam me; needless to say the name Whipple has negative connotations with me .Thus, another reason I went with the E-Force.
That is the dumbest reason I've ever heard for not buying the Whipple, but it's also freaking hilarious!
Dangeruss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2011, 05:23 PM   #86
izaks
 
Drives: Chev Lumina 416
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Africa
Posts: 22
"
All the PD blowers are going to have close to the same horsepower and torque granted they are running the same boost. "

Not even close.

The lower the intake charge temp, the denser it will be, and make considerably more power at the same boost.

You also need to understand that the Eforce and Magna are not "PD" blowers.

The Whipple, KB and Lysholm are PD blowers.
izaks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2011, 10:52 PM   #87
Whipped416

 
Whipped416's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 CAMARO SS
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,515
just ordered my WHIPPLE. will i need a IAT relocation? has anyone been having problems blowing fuses on the MSD? also will a CAI fit without any modifications on my whipple blower setup?
Thanks for all the help C5
Whipped416 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2011, 03:40 PM   #88
GrinderSS
Account Suspended
 
Drives: IOM 2SS/RS
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 539
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dangeruss View Post
That is the dumbest reason I've ever heard for not buying the Whipple, but it's also freaking hilarious!
LOL! I know but the mere mention of the name Whipple makes my sphincter tighten.
GrinderSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2011, 08:06 PM   #89
MARZ
 
MARZ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 BMW 335d
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: U.S.
Posts: 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by izaks View Post
"
All the PD blowers are going to have close to the same horsepower and torque granted they are running the same boost. "

Not even close.

The lower the intake charge temp, the denser it will be, and make considerably more power at the same boost.

You also need to understand that the Eforce and Magna are not "PD" blowers.

The Whipple, KB and Lysholm are PD blowers.
You do realize that "PD" stands for "positive displacement" and, yes, roots blowers such as Edelbrock's E-Force and Magnuson Products' Magnacharger are, in fact, "PD" superchargers.
MARZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 03:42 PM   #90
izaks
 
Drives: Chev Lumina 416
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Africa
Posts: 22
You need to do your homework before making a comment like that.
All Roots/Magna blowers are NOT Positive Displacement blowers.
izaks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 04:00 PM   #91
Good2go
Team Chevrolet
 
Good2go's Avatar
 
Drives: 2007 Z06 and 2011 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 441
So, what defines a PD blower?

Inquiring noobs (like me) want to know...
Good2go is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2011, 10:43 PM   #92
MARZ
 
MARZ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 BMW 335d
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: U.S.
Posts: 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by izaks View Post
You need to do your homework before making a comment like that.
All Roots/Magna blowers are NOT Positive Displacement blowers.
How about following your own advice. Please show me ONE, JUST ONE roots / Magnacharger that is NOT positive displacement.

From Magnuson, makers of the roots-style Magnacharger,

"This is because the hybrid-roots style supercharger is a Positive Displacement Blower and moves its volume in air with each revolution – no matter what speed it spins at."


http://magnacharger.wordpress.com/20...finitive-test/

"A Magna Charger, Inc./Eaton supercharger is a hybrid roots design and a positive displacement pump."

http://www.magnacharger.com/faq.htm

From Eaton,

"Eaton manufactures highly engineered, roots-type positive displacement superchargers."

http://www.eaton.com/EatonCom/Produc...Superchargers/

"Eaton designs and manufactures precision Roots-type positive displacement superchargers for highly specific automotive applications."

http://www.eaton.com/Eaton/ProductsS...gers/index.htm

This pretty much sums up why twin-screw compressors and roots "blowers" are, by definition, positive displacement superchargers:

"This is because the hybrid-roots style supercharger is a Positive Displacement Blower and moves its volume in air with each revolution – no matter what speed it spins at. Centrifugals, on the other hand, have to “spool up” like a turbo and have an output that increases with rotational speed giving the centrifugal its “peaky” powerband."

http://magnacharger.wordpress.com/20...finitive-test/

Is that enough "homework" for ya?

Last edited by MARZ; 04-12-2011 at 11:09 PM.
MARZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2011, 03:40 AM   #93
izaks
 
Drives: Chev Lumina 416
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Africa
Posts: 22
Apologies

The distinction I was trying to make was between the Roots crowd (Magna/Eforce) and a Twin Screw. (Whipple/KB/Lysholm)
The Roots are "merely" air pumps (no pressure/boost inside the case housing the rotors)
The twin screw compresses the air (boost - my definition of PD) between the rotors (inside the case) which results in higher efficency
Which is why I refuted the statement which said that boost for boost "All PD blowers would make the same HP"
izaks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2011, 10:56 AM   #94
simon.w
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2011 2SS RS 6M Inferno Orange
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: San Clemente CA
Posts: 309
Quote:
Originally Posted by sed34 View Post
agreed. I want to hear the engine and exhaust. Not the huge whine. I've never been big on that. You don't hear the whine on the luxury cars. Just a powerful engine.
Really? The whine is the sexiest sound of all ... and VERY intimidating to other drivers who are thinking of taking you on ... especially those hiroshima screamers with their stupid "ppppfffffffffffttttttttttt" sound between gear changes.
simon.w is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011, 12:56 AM   #95
VADER SS L99


 
VADER SS L99's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 A6 GT 5.0
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 2,909
[QUOTE=10aSSee D;2940321]All the PD blowers are going to have close to the same horsepower and torque granted they are running the same boost. This statement is 100% not true and if it was we would all just buy whatever blower is the cheapest. A bigger or more effecient blower makes more power per lb of boost because of many reasons. 1 is the blower is turning at a lower RPM. A blower that turns slower doesnt generate as much heat thus decreasing IAT's creating more power through tuning. 2 The bigger blower is moving more air. More air means more power potential. All of these aspects are if the cooling systems are equal and If the cooling system is better and more effecient than another then it too will make more power. Then there is the debate of roots TVS vs twin screw. I will not get into that one but it is of my opinion that a twin screw blower is more effecient than a roots and as a result make more power per lb of boost. If all superchargers and turbos were equal and made the same hp per lb of boost then there would be no market for them and we would not have such a hard time choosing 1.

Anyone who is still a skeptical noob can just do a search and you will find mounds of data on this issue. KB for instance makes bigger more effecient blowers constantly and test them against their old ones which reveal that the bigger blower is making more power per lb of boost. Case in point closer to home is in GMHTP MAY 11 issue. Redline Motorsports added a KB 2.8 to a 10 SS. Its pre KB combination was a Magnuson powered and built LS3 7.0 producing 14-15psi and it made 712RWHP. After bolting the KB on and getting the boost to the same psi it pumped out 796RWHP and 750lbs tq. Are you going to see 84RWHP difference between the TVS 2300 and KB 2.8 or Whipple 2.9 at the same boost level on a stock motor? no, but 40+RWHP is totally possible.
__________________
BLK/BLK 1SS/RS Ordered 11-01-2009 Took delivery 12-22-2009. Heads/cam/converter/bolt ons. SOLD Feb 2015 to fund 6th gen LT1 SS with 8L90E.
VADER SS L99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011, 11:32 AM   #96
Sawyer


 
Sawyer's Avatar
 
Drives: '13 5.0
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by VADER SS L99 View Post
All the PD blowers are going to have close to the same horsepower..A bigger or more effecient blower makes more power per lb of boost because of many reasons. 1 is the blower is turning at a lower RPM. A blower that turns slower doesnt generate as much heat thus decreasing IAT's creating more power through tuning. 2 The bigger blower is moving more air. More air means more power potential. All of these aspects are if the cooling systems are equal and If the cooling system is better and more effecient than another then it too will make more power. Then there is the debate of roots TVS vs twin screw. I will not get into that one but it is of my opinion that a twin screw blower is more effecient than a roots
Sawyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011, 11:53 AM   #97
deuce189
 
deuce189's Avatar
 
Drives: 2009 370Z (for sale)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Charleston, South Carolina
Posts: 70
Granted this has been a thread about which is better than the other. This has been the most informative thread i've read so far between the two SC's. I'm been in a dilemma trying to figure out which direction to go when and if i purchase a SS. The plan in itself is to SC it right off the bat, well... maybe enjoy it for a bit stock and then later SC it. I have the cash now to purchase the SC and small supporting mods to give the car ~530whp. But i think if i was smart i would just put that cash down on the car to get lower principle value and lower payments, lol. Any who seems like the E-force will be more than plenty for me and keep me quite happy for the weekend warrior street car. Keep posting guys, this has been very interesting read.
deuce189 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2011, 08:06 PM   #98
MidnightNitemare
W.I.P
 
Drives: imperial metallic blue camaro zl1
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: edinburg,tx
Posts: 27
Send a message via Skype™ to MidnightNitemare
idk if its true or not but a friend of mine at hennesey adviced me not to go w the whipple since its to powerful for the stock engine and could be inconsistent at times if you want to go with the whipple your going to have to build it quite a bit for it to be a consistent and keep your engine safe ipaintbridges did the right thing and got the custom blower cam which makes more power at the crank securing it more... i personally on the hunt for a supercharger myself and so far im thinking bout the either the whipple or the tvs
MidnightNitemare is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Polished Whipple Build w/ pics & tips GMRULZ Forced Induction - V8 65 12-24-2011 05:14 PM
Edelbrock E Force Supercharger with Free Shipping Jason@Phastek Forced Induction 7 12-25-2010 10:29 PM
Top Mount Decision- TVS2300, KB, Whipple thekid96 Forced Induction - V8 106 03-03-2010 11:37 AM
Compare..Edelbrock, Harrop, KB, Maggie, Whipple, GM(LS9) old motorhead Forced Induction - V8 12 02-21-2010 02:33 PM
Where did Whipple and Edelbrock Disapear to? Wileytrigger21 Forced Induction - V8 5 12-19-2009 08:54 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.