![]() |
|
|
#85 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 1LS 3.6 LLT V6 325 HP Join Date: May 2009
Location: LS
Posts: 4,244
|
Before top tier gas you had to run premium to get the detergents you needed to keep the injectors clean,
87 top tier solves this (same detergents). If my car is not running right on 87 then I have to solve the problem. Could be moisture in the tank, dirty throttle or MAF, fuse pull etc etc. Those who say "doesn't work on the V6" are wrong, I have proved it over and over. Putting 93 in is just a band aid approach. (hello black exhaust tips) Spent many Yrs in the Automotive field traveling to auto assembly lines, I know my cars like the back of my hands. Each should do what gives them their own comfort factor.
__________________
2010 Camaro Auto, Inferno Orange, Titanium Interior, Gearhead Wheels AIRAID CAI
Last edited by TooCool5; 05-23-2013 at 09:04 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#86 | |
|
I Use Three Pedals
Drives: 2011 VR M6 Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 793
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
Emerald Coast Camaros
Drives: A lot of show, not much go. Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Emerald Coast
Posts: 3,388
|
Hmmmm......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#88 | ||
|
Emerald Coast Camaros
Drives: A lot of show, not much go. Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Emerald Coast
Posts: 3,388
|
Quote:
Quote:
Hmmmm...... ![]() I've used 87 octane (I knew no better...and maybe I still don't but I'm trying 93 for the heck of it) since I got the car two years ago and my exhaust tips have always gotten black. I don't think it matters what octane gas you use....so I think I agree with SC2150 on that one. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2014 Summit White 2SS/RS M6 Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: @ ur moms house in VA
Posts: 1,405
|
will put 93 today and report back in a few days
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#90 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2012 Camaro RS, RX supercharged Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 6,063
|
Quote:
Now on a DI engine, the fuel (as far as valves goes) never touches the intake valves so the coking issue is huge, even at 15-20k miles. Anyone that has remove their intake manifold can attest to their valves looking like this w/out a catchcan installed: http://www.google.com/search?q=intak...w=2021&bih=875 This is a compilation of pictures submitted by techs all over the work dealing with the coking. On port injection we can remove heads with 100-200 k miles that used top tier fuels and the intake valves still look like new. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 SIM 2LT/1970 Camaro Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Near Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 1,578
|
What are you referring to when you say you've "proved it over and over"? The 5/20 fuse pull on a V6? If so, you're saying that it works on the LLT (with the Bosch ECM)? This contradicts everything I've heard about this topic, is why I'm asking.
__________________
All bleeding stops eventually -- 2012 2LT Auto w/sunroof -- My journal thread
Roto-Fab Intake & W/W Relocate Kit -- ADM Race Scoop -- Dynomax VT Axle-Back Exhaust -- Vitesse Throttle Controller RX Catch Can -- Drake Bowtie Delete -- JacFab Radio Face Cover -- LED Fog Lights -- LED Dome/Trunk/Plate Lights -- Gen5DIY Dash ABL -- Diode Dynamics Cupholder Lighting Wishlist: ACS T5 Splitter -- Hood Vent Mod -- Footwell/Door Pull/Homelink Button Lighting |
|
|
|
|
|
#92 |
![]() |
My experiment is over. I've gone through 2 full tanks of 93 and about 700 miles of mixed city/hw driving and I am currently at 21.1 which is only .7 ahead of where I was using 87 octane. That is insignificant and I will return to just 87. At least with my V6, 93 does not seem to give me any greater performance whether it be torque or gas mileage.
__________________
2013 2LT/RS IOM M6 w/DUAL-MODE EXHAUST, BLADE WING SPOILER AND ZL/1 PERFORMANCE PEDALS
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#93 |
|
KaBoom1701
Drives: 13' ZL1 Red M6 Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: I.E. SoCal (Yucaipa)
Posts: 8,631
|
I just run one tank of 91/93 top tie gas per month to help keep in engine clean.
Other than that...meh...I'd say any performance increase in minimal. I will say however this, this applies to stock V6 cars. Once you mod your car I would think having higher octane gas helps you take advantage of your mods you have on your car. Just my two cents on this subject.... Move along, these are not the droids your looking for!
__________________
Mods:
Roto-Fab Intake, WW Res. kit & Big Gulp Air Scoop, Elite Catch Can, ATI Super Damper & 18% OD Pulley, LF Idler pulley bracket, Metco CC breather, ID850 Injectors, Stainless Power Headers w/ ceramic coating, TR71X Spark Plugs, JMS Fuel Pump Booster, Bo White TB, Tuned by Ted @ Jannetty Racing, Ron Davis HX, D3 Reservoir, Pfadt 1" Springs, Moreno Camber Plates, ZL1 Addons Splitter guard washers, Tow Hook kit & rock guards, Hurst Shifter Billet Plus 6 Speed Short Shifter, ZL1 DRL lighting harness, ZL1 Recaro Seats. |
|
|
|
|
|
#94 |
|
I Use Three Pedals
Drives: 2011 VR M6 Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 793
|
when i used 87 i would go to the gas station twice a week but with 93 its once(this is going to school, work, gym, and home) thats enough reason for me to use 93. in the end gas is gas though.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#95 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 SW 2LS Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 870
|
Most people think, oh fast car and kinda expensive, it should have premium! Simply not true... Take the Ferrari 308 Euro Spec, that car will blow its engine on anything higher than 89 octane because of low compression. In Italy during the 80s high octane fuel didn't exist and the car was a built with that in mind; stupid pump jockey tried telling me otherwise as I was filling up one day!
Last edited by Scooter11; 05-27-2013 at 08:46 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#96 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 11 F150 EB/13 Sonic RS/15 Z06 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 7,127
|
Quote:
![]() Compression ratio of the LLT and LFX are much higher than the L99 and LS3.
__________________
New Ride -- 2015 Z06 2LZ (stock) -- Journal
Old Ride -- 2012 Camaro 2LT/RS (647 RWHP & 726 RWTQ) -- Build Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#97 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 SW 2LS Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 870
|
Quote:
![]() I did a bit too much assuming there 11.3:1 to 10.7/10.4:1 But in my defense, the Ferrari I was talking about has a compression ratio of 9.7:1 so that part of my statement still holds water... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#98 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 11 F150 EB/13 Sonic RS/15 Z06 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 7,127
|
Yeah and the LFX is 11.4:1. I would not put 93 octane in an old low compression engine either, though.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using Tapatalk 2
__________________
New Ride -- 2015 Z06 2LZ (stock) -- Journal
Old Ride -- 2012 Camaro 2LT/RS (647 RWHP & 726 RWTQ) -- Build Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|