The 2011+ Mustang Thread

[THE EVIL TW1N]

Originally Posted by Bad70supreme

That will NOT be the norm, and if you put DRs on a stock V6 I dont think there will be any improvement. They dont have enough power, it will hook and bog... guys with stock SS's are already having this problem running stickys!

117mph trap speeds indicates that its not gonna be THAT rare either though .

The stock SS's might be having a bog problem because of the weight + gearing

[Huggerorange73]

Originally Posted by THE EVIL TW1N

ummmmmm.....380rwhp is still a good number and within range of the norm and still more than ive seen any stock LS3 Camaro put to the wheels. i still dont see a problem here?? how much more power were you expecting

i swear its like some of you guys just WANT to argue about anything and then blame the "other clan" when you get a response.

100% stock with a shade over 2K miles on it....the sheet is from my car.

[THE EVIL TW1N]

Originally Posted by Huggerorange73

100% stock with a shade over 2K miles on it....the sheet is from my car.

aha it worked, thanks for replying. as you see, the average LS3 Camaros dyno maybe 370rwhp and you dynoed 391rwhp but then you turn around and want to argue about a 5.0 dynoing 380rwhp vs 395rwhp just further proves what i already said, the 380rwhp is within variances and arguing otherwise is just foolishness and youre doing it just for the sake of trying to bait people. and you cant say 395rwhp hasnt ever happened again either because its been documented on other unrelated occasions dynoing 390+rwhp stock also.

[assasinator]

Originally Posted by THE EVIL TW1N

i think the fastest 5.0's to date have been 3.31 geared. While the 5.0 has a clear and definate advantage, on average its still a close race. there has been maybe half a handful of posts (or less) saying anything remotely close to "all 5.0s murder Camaro SSs"

the 3.31's are only faster on an untuned car. i rev to 7300 and can change it to 7800. there is no need for a last 100' shift when tuned.

autos are the fastest at the track when tuned and geared anyway.

[Huggerorange73]

Originally Posted by THE EVIL TW1N

thats not a dynojet.

even then, average LS3 Camaros dyno maybe 370rwhp and you dynoed 391rwhp but then you turn around and want to argue about a 5.0 dynoing 380rwhp vs 395rwhp just further proves what i already said, the 380rwhp is within variances and arguing otherwise is just foolishness and youre doing it just for the sake of trying to bait people.

Most LS3 cars fall into the 375 - 380 range.

All I did was respond to your baiting statement that you've never seen an LS3 do the numbers.

[Georgie]

Originally Posted by THE EVIL TW1N

those mods are putting them at about 405rwhp



depends on other things like what tires you plan on running and what your future mods list looks like. stockish, i think 3.31 or 3.55 is best.

WOW!!!

[Milk 1027]

Originally Posted by THE EVIL TW1N

thats not a dynojet.

even then, average LS3 Camaros dyno maybe 370rwhp and you dynoed 391rwhp but then you turn around and want to argue about a 5.0 dynoing 380rwhp vs 395rwhp just further proves what i already said, the 380rwhp is within variances and arguing otherwise is just foolishness and youre doing it just for the sake of trying to bait people.

lmao
What do you call what you're doing?

[8cd03gro]

Originally Posted by Black5thgen

Impossible, haven't you learned in the mustang universe that the lower HP and slower cars are the exception and not the norm. There are no problems with the test fleet cars, it's the thousands of productions cars that are "off" at time of testing.

You mean like the bone stock 5.0s that have run 12.6s, 12.5s and all the way down to 12.39? Hmm. . . those people must have bought cars from the magazines?

You're totally right. It's a conspiracy to make the mustang, that is actually slower, SEEM faster. They have placed 150 secret-weapon 5.0s in the hands of the right people with a different tune. The member here that posted he trapped and et'd faster in his 5.0 than his camaro is really a russian spy in direct contact with putin through his sync system.

[THE EVIL TW1N]

Originally Posted by Milk 1027

lmao
What do you call what you're doing?

i preferred to just leave the 395rwhp and 380rwhp results as is and just within variances instead of trying to go into more conspiracy theorys

[THE EVIL TW1N]

Originally Posted by Huggerorange73

Most LS3 cars fall into the 375 - 380 range.

All I did was respond to your baiting statement that you've never seen an LS3 do the numbers.

well, youre saying its ok for your car to dyno 20rwhp more than average but not ok for a mustang to dyno 15rwhp more than the previous 5.0 there did! and you provided proof thats its possible. wow awesome case you built up for yourself. thats why im saying youre arguing just for the sake of arguing.

[Huggerorange73]

Originally Posted by Milk 1027

lmao
What do you call what you're doing?

[Huggerorange73]

Originally Posted by THE EVIL TW1N

well, youre saying its ok for your car to dyno 20rwhp more than average but not ok for a mustang to dyno 15rwhp more than average! and you provided proof thats its possible. wow awesome case you built up for yourself. thats why im saying youre arguing just for the sake of arguing.

20 more? I don't think so.....that dyno produces a typical 380 hp pulls.

[THE EVIL TW1N]

Originally Posted by Huggerorange73

20 more? I don't think so.....that dyno produces a typical 380 hp pulls.

more proof??

[8cd03gro]

Just to keep the facts straight - the two mustangs in question didn't have a 20rwhp difference at peak hp, they had a 15rwhp difference at peak, only 4rwhp more than what you say the difference between your car and the average ls3 does on that dyno. Not exactly mind blowing.

I'd be interested to see if dyno calibration was exactly the same. Most importantly, correction factor, smoothing, and weather conditions. Either way, 15rwhp at peak is far from unheard of when it comes to variations between stock cars. This is why dyno racing is stupid.