Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
dave@hennessey
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Regional Forums > USA - Texas


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-17-2010, 09:48 PM   #15
O44DOG
 
Drives: 2010 SS
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: BEAUMONT, TX
Posts: 98
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroSkooter View Post
How can they legally sell gas with 10% ethanol in it at the same price as gas with no ethanol in it?

And, how can gas have 10% ethanol in it if it's still 93 octane?
They have had ethanol in gas is Cali for so long it is ashame. The alcohol is added for emmissions. The push for alcohol is because it reduces the need for fossil fuel and it burns real clean. I have had an experience with E85, which is 85% alcohol. It doesn't create smoke even when burned in bulk. Alcohol fuel is about $5 a gallon. It burns hot, but does not produce the horsepower that gas does.

As for lawnmowers, I know you can take a lawnmower engine, drill out the carburator, and run alcohol fuel. This will double the horse power of the engine. They do it with go-cart racing all the time.
O44DOG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 09:52 PM   #16
Mr. Wyndham
I used to be Dragoneye...
 
Mr. Wyndham's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 ZL1 1LE
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 31,876
Send a message via AIM to Mr. Wyndham
Ethanol actually has potential to make MORE hp than gas, it's essentially racing fuel with 104 Octane or so.....the Corvette racing team even uses E85 in their cars...

...the problem right now is that engines are not optimized for the stuff. Mostly because it's not not nearly as available as gas...if they were, this conversation wouldn't be happening, I bet.

10% really shouldn't make a noticeable difference though. They've been designing engines and computer systems since '85 to deal with the stuff. The biggest change would be a drop in fuel economy....I'm talking 1 solid mpg...MAYBE 2.
__________________
"Keep the faith." - Fbodfather
Mr. Wyndham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2010, 09:25 AM   #17
Chrisrp454

 
Chrisrp454's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 ABM 2SS/RS M6, 98Z28 M6
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Granbury, Tx
Posts: 1,532
Edited "Sorry I should have said 10-15% is bad, e85 does not have this issue as bad".

Not sure about hotter, but it does gum up thier fuel systems.
Fact ethonal attracts moisture. When it breaks down it forms a gel gunk.
The little needle holes in the carbs are stopped up with the gel, starved for fuel, they won't run and have to be cleaned.
You have to remember that fuel in mowers, trimmers and such tends to be more exposed to the elements, so it breaks down faster.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dagon68 View Post
Also, I read somewhere that this stuff is making lawn mowers run allot hotter and blowing the motor.
__________________
Always Remember! Rest in Peace Brothers
9/11/2001. And thanks to all those who defend and serve!


Ordered 5/23/2009
3400 with TPW of 08/03/09
3800 8/11/2009
Arrived 8/21/2009 2SS/RS/Aqua Blue/Grey Interior
Chrisrp454 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2010, 09:34 AM   #18
UT-Engineer
Just Cruisin'
 
UT-Engineer's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Synergy Camaro
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,224
IS there a difference on the HP and MPG gains when using 87 vs 89 or 91 octane on the V6?
__________________
2010 Synergy Green Camaro
25% Tint - CGM Painted GM GFX - 20" Niche M102 Wheels

UT-Engineer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2010, 10:17 AM   #19
Legend
Hello!
 
Legend's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 JSB Z06!
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,624
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaylorSS View Post
with all the summer travel plans I thought it might be worth a bump.
No-go in San Antonio..all the staions listed have been confirmed to have 10% stickers displayed now...no more 100% gas in SA.
Legend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2010, 09:41 AM   #20
sportyb24
Romanian Outlaw
 
sportyb24's Avatar
 
Drives: 13 ZL1 , 14 Silverado Crew Cab
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Texas Baby
Posts: 1,082
Does anyone know a pump in Waco ethanol free?!??
__________________
[/SIGPIC]2013 Camaro ZL1 M6
sportyb24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2010, 03:10 PM   #21
BaylorSS
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS RS
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 52
The EPA finally requirements finally hit Waco last fall. I'd link the article but there's a fee to view the archives.

1.) Ethanol blend makes way to Waco gas stations
Author: J.B. Smith Tribune-Herald staff writer

Ethanol blends have quietly made their way to Waco-area gasoline pumps this fall, and that has Bob Potter fuming.


Potter, a retired defense worker who lives in Hewitt, calls the 10 percent ethanol blend a "snake oil concoction"that hurts his gas mileage and maybe his engine.

"I'm not getting my money's worth,"he said. "I don't see any difference in price with the ethanol blend.

Publish Date: December 18, 2009 | Word Count: 881 | Document ID: 12182009-wac-ethanol
BaylorSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2010, 03:55 PM   #22
sportyb24
Romanian Outlaw
 
sportyb24's Avatar
 
Drives: 13 ZL1 , 14 Silverado Crew Cab
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Texas Baby
Posts: 1,082
This shit is sum bs that the goverment ta get ur money fukin scammers is all I say!!!
__________________
[/SIGPIC]2013 Camaro ZL1 M6
sportyb24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2010, 05:38 PM   #23
Sack Rat 2SS

 
Sack Rat 2SS's Avatar
 
Drives: Silver SS/RS, Man 6
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: DFW area, Texas
Posts: 884
The upside of E85 is 101 to 104 octane rating, cleanburning, keeps injectors and fuel system clean. Higher octane means more spark advance and cooler fuel/air charge in cylinders combining to give more HP. Not meant for older cars/mowers with steel fuel tanks, rubber hoses, etc. Our cars have poly plastic fuel tanks, fuel pumps, plastic evap lines, etc as they are not affected by use of etanol. E85 is not as caustic as is methanol. Also the price per gallon is somewhat less than gasolene (10-15%). The downside is approx 30% less mileage. E85 has 15% fuel added to aide in very cold climates with cold start issues. Also availability limited in many parts of the USA. Fillups more frequent. Requires an entirely different tune in our ECM's. Lastly the fuel delivery system plus injectors need upgrading in order to handle added volume of E85 over gasolene. Just my 2 cents. Could be a good thing but not in a daily driver.
__________________
Silver 2SS/RS Man/6
CTS-V front 6-Piston Calipers,
GM 3.91 Rear Gears
Sack Rat 2SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2010, 10:20 PM   #24
sportyb24
Romanian Outlaw
 
sportyb24's Avatar
 
Drives: 13 ZL1 , 14 Silverado Crew Cab
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Texas Baby
Posts: 1,082
Idk it's jus bs since it hasn't changed the price
__________________
[/SIGPIC]2013 Camaro ZL1 M6
sportyb24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2010, 05:05 AM   #25
Hephaestus1
 
Hephaestus1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2LT/RS A6
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Between a Rock and a Weird place, TX
Posts: 37
Quote:
Originally Posted by UT-Enginner View Post
IS there a difference on the HP and MPG gains when using 87 vs 89 or 91 octane on the V6?
MPG, yes; HP/Tq, I don't know for certain. I've been running a long series of experiments on V6 MPG vs. octane, and until I got some 87oct results, I was feeling really good about 93. My current, albeit incomplete results are: 87oct => ~17.58mpg, 89oct => ~17.42mpg, 93oct => ~18.36mpg (all with 10% ethanol; this is my daily-driver, and my commutes are very consistent, so my percentage-wise results are fairly accurate).

A couple of points: 1. Since 93oct is ~4.4% gain in mpg over 87oct, but 93oct costs ~11% more than 87, the "cheapest" gas is clearly 87oct. 2. Several forumites have noticed that the V6 retards alot more timing with 87oct versus 93oct--suggests more power with 93 oct.

Also note our cars are NOT E-85 compatible. Ethanol is a corrosive, hygroscopic boondoggle thrust upon us by mindless twits, whose pockets are lined by corn growers...growers that cannot even remotely produce enough corn to handle both food and fuel demands. Ethanol is much more expensive to produce than straight gasoline.

Also a UT "Enginner," BS '96
Hephaestus1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2010, 11:27 AM   #26
sportyb24
Romanian Outlaw
 
sportyb24's Avatar
 
Drives: 13 ZL1 , 14 Silverado Crew Cab
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Texas Baby
Posts: 1,082
Good news all skinnys in the Waco area are free of ethanol!!!!
__________________
[/SIGPIC]2013 Camaro ZL1 M6
sportyb24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.