Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
dave@hennessey
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-04-2008, 03:41 PM   #1
GTAHVIT
Blessed
 
GTAHVIT's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Sonic RS MT
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Saint Augustine FL
Posts: 28,444
CAFE What's it doing to the industry?

I read this post in another thread. It got me thinking.

Quote:
Originally Posted by joes3rdcamaro82/91/2010 View Post
How is Dodge getting away with their horrible gas sucking Challenger? Surley GM can make a Z28 that can get the same or better gas milage! Don't you guys think?
I struggle with this also. No one seems to really know how CAFE will "score" (for lack of a better word) the manufacturers. I guess what I don't understand is why can't they make a special edition ZL1 or Z28 for a couple years? The requirement isn't until 2020. I don't understand why they have to cancel programs now... I'm sure there is a reason. I just don't know enough about CAFE to see it.

So please post away. This is intended to be a free for all on CAFE. Good, bad, strategies, whatever.

BTW. I'm not a fan.
GTAHVIT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2008, 03:52 PM   #2
HOTCIVIC
 
HOTCIVIC's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: MN
Posts: 115
Here's a good read on CAFE by a member on another Camaro site:

Question:
Quote:
so i dont exactly get these cafe ratings... its manditory that they meet them, or they have to pay a gas guzzler tax if they dont?
Answer:
Quote:
Originally Posted by guionM View Post
It's the combined corperate average mpg of all vehicles a car company sells.

Each vehicle is tested and rated at a certain mpg rating. This number is NOT any of the numbers on your window sticker from the EPA. This is a number by a different agency that is actually on the pretty high side as far as fuel economy ratings go.

The other side of the equasion is how many vehicles are sold. In a company that sells, say, a million vehicles per year, a car that sells at a rate of 200,000 per year is going to have 10 times the impact on the company's CAFE rating than a vehicle in the same company that sells 20,000.

In a company like General Motors that sold 3.87 million vehicles last year, the 8,700 Corvette Z06s sold had pretty much no impact on GM's CAFE numbers, while the Impala that sold at least 250,000 models last year is going to impact GM's CAFE like a SOB.

The "Gas Guzzler Tax" is a totally different animal with nothing to do with CAFE. The "Guzzler Tax" is a tax applied to any car (trucks are exempt) that gets a combined EPA fuel economy below 22.5 mpg combined. American made cars that fall into that void are cars like SRT8-anything from Chrysler, Vipers, the now defunct Ford GT, the Shelby GT 500 and it's mega-powered spinoffs. These vehicles get hit with the tax, yet, these vehicles also sell in such miniscule numbers that they have virturally zero impact on CAFE standards.

Light trucks and SUVs don't pay a Gas Guzzler's tax, but their fuel economy (or lack thereof) will have a humongous impact on fuel economy since that is well more than half of what US automakers sell domestically.... and hence, the panic. Trucks had their own CAFE numbers to meet, but the new regs combine both cars and trucks together when figuring out future CAFE regs.

In 2007, all vehicles sold in the US averaged just under 21 mpg (cars alone were nearly 30!). If the issue was moving only cars to 40 mpg in 12 years, that would be no problem (despite how much resistance you see). But throw trucks in the mix, and it becomes a major problem.

It's easy to blame legislators because they are a collective, faceless organization. But the real problem is that 99.9% of the public don't understand anything about automobiles more than getting in and driving... and that goes for the officials we vote for as well. This goes for BOTH political parties and BOTH ends of the political spectrum (only a moron would overlook that).

But the fact is that we do have an oil addiction that essentially makes us borrow money from China to pay for oil we get from places that either don't like us or are unstable and are 1 coup away from turning against us. The obvious way around CAFE that would take the pressure off of car manufacturers is a gas tax that keeps gasoline at $4 or even $5 per gallon (perhaps using the money to pay off our catostrophic debt to China and other countries that's funding us). But that idea is essentially political suicide. The only other way is through CAFE, and IMO, it's the worst choice of the necessary evils.

The hawks are for it because less imported oil increases our security (as long as oil companies get more money to make up the loss via higher prices). Treehuggers love it because they think it means less pollution. Legislatures and Congress love it because it's an easy way to appeal to their own constituents on both sides.

This was probably a $50 answer to a $1 question, so, sorry if I went on a rampage.
I didn't understand CAFE all that well but he did a good job explaining it in my opinion.
HOTCIVIC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2008, 03:53 PM   #3
GTAHVIT
Blessed
 
GTAHVIT's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Sonic RS MT
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Saint Augustine FL
Posts: 28,444
Nice find.
GTAHVIT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2008, 03:58 PM   #4
HOTCIVIC
 
HOTCIVIC's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: MN
Posts: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtahvit View Post
Nice find.
Thank you sir.

I don't know how we can get around CAFE. He's right that the majority of the population doesn't know anything about cars other than getting in and driving, and most aren't performance enthusiasts so not that many people care if there are Z28s or Z06s or GT500s or Challenger SRT8s available for sale. People like us make up a small percentage of the population so it seems impossible to change anything about CAFE. :(
HOTCIVIC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2008, 04:00 PM   #5
Jamestwilliams
junior member
 
Drives: Grand Am
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: canada
Posts: 534
It's not the Cafe regulations that are bad (i don't agree with them). It's the exemption companies like Ferrari and Lamborghini get, allowing the rich to be exempt from Cafe regulations. It's a completely undemocratic law more akin to what you would find in a third world dictatorship. Foreign oil really, the largest supplier of oil to the US is Canada, second is Mexico then third is Saudi Arabia. Which of those countries is in danger of a coupe?
Jamestwilliams is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2008, 04:01 PM   #6
GTAHVIT
Blessed
 
GTAHVIT's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Sonic RS MT
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Saint Augustine FL
Posts: 28,444
Quote:
Originally Posted by HOTCIVIC View Post
Thank you sir.

I don't know how we can get around CAFE. He's right that the majority of the population doesn't know anything about cars other than getting in and driving, and most aren't performance enthusiasts so not that many people care if there are Z28s or Z06s or GT500s or Challenger SRT8s available for sale. People like us make up a small percentage of the population so it seems impossible to change anything about CAFE. :(
I'm just gonna ignore the last part of this post......... If I ignore it, it isn't true...
GTAHVIT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2008, 04:10 PM   #7
Punk_rider

 
Punk_rider's Avatar
 
Drives: VW Typ 166 + Black 1LE
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 763
Stupid question: if the car is manufactured outside of the US, does the standard still apply? I mean, there's no way this standard would apply to Ferrari ...
__________________
I'm kindly asking: "May I have a supercharged Z28 with 550 hp please? By the end of 2009 would be awesome. Thanks"
Punk_rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2008, 04:10 PM   #8
The_Blur
Moderator
 
The_Blur's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Harley-Davidson Street Bob
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 14,769
Send a message via AIM to The_Blur
It isn't about getting around CAFE. The CAFE problem is in the process of solving itself. People are buying compacts instead of SUVs, meaning that companies that sell compacts can have inefficient trucks on their list. If GM sells more Cobalts, then the Silverado can have low fuel efficiency because the Cobalt will bring up the average. People moving from SUVs to compacts are actually improving GM's ratings.

Obviously, some of those customers move to other brands for their cars. All GM needs to do is push compacts. That is already happening, and cars like the G5, Cobalt, and Ion—yes, all Delta cars—are doing very well.

It is very understandable that people panic about CAFE. The idea of losing powerful V8s is terrifying for us, the car enthusiasts; however, we have to remember that all companies that produce SUVs are losing sales, and they are losing those sales to compacts or people who are just keeping their cars for longer. GM produces great compacts that sell very well, so I am not worried. We will get our pony cars with thanks to smaller displacement cars like the Delta platform.
__________________
RDP Motorsport//GEN5DIY//Cultrag Performance//JPSS//Rodgets Chevrolet//
Operation Demon//Buy at Invoice//RACECARWEAR
RESPECT ALL CARS. LOVE YOUR OWN.
warn 145:159 ban
The_Blur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2008, 04:22 PM   #9
HOTCIVIC
 
HOTCIVIC's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: MN
Posts: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Blur View Post
It isn't about getting around CAFE. The CAFE problem is in the process of solving itself. People are buying compacts instead of SUVs, meaning that companies that sell compacts can have inefficient trucks on their list. If GM sells more Cobalts, then the Silverado can have low fuel efficiency because the Cobalt will bring up the average. People moving from SUVs to compacts are actually improving GM's ratings.

Obviously, some of those customers move to other brands for their cars. All GM needs to do is push compacts. That is already happening, and cars like the G5, Cobalt, and Ion—yes, all Delta cars—are doing very well.

It is very understandable that people panic about CAFE. The idea of losing powerful V8s is terrifying for us, the car enthusiasts; however, we have to remember that all companies that produce SUVs are losing sales, and they are losing those sales to compacts or people who are just keeping their cars for longer. GM produces great compacts that sell very well, so I am not worried. We will get our pony cars with thanks to smaller displacement cars like the Delta platform.
Good post.
HOTCIVIC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2008, 04:49 PM   #10
The_Stache
SoCal Race Team #13
 
The_Stache's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 1SS:RS:LS3:SW
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,803
Quote:
Originally Posted by Punk_rider View Post
Stupid question: if the car is manufactured outside of the US, does the standard still apply? I mean, there's no way this standard would apply to Ferrari ...
Yes it does, BUT the hitch is a number (i think its 20,000). If you sell less than that quantity in TOTAL company sales in the USA then you are exempt from CAFE.

Ferrari generally only makes about about that many cars for the world in total a year... so yea they qualify for the exemption... Porsche on the other hand is completely screwed and from the rumors I've heard is contemplating pulling out the US market COMPLETELY...
__________________
A.K.A - Diarmadhi (old handle) - So much to do.. So little money
Owner : Fast-Stache Industries LLC
The_Stache is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2008, 05:01 PM   #11
Wm Holden
Yes, that's my real name.
 
Wm Holden's Avatar
 
Drives: 2005 LS2 600hp GTO
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Ventura, ca.
Posts: 770
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtahvit View Post
I read this post in another thread. It got me thinking.



I struggle with this also. No one seems to really know how CAFE will "score" (for lack of a better word) the manufacturers. I guess what I don't understand is why can't they make a special edition ZL1 or Z28 for a couple years? The requirement isn't until 2020. I don't understand why they have to cancel programs now... I'm sure there is a reason. I just don't know enough about CAFE to see it.

So please post away. This is intended to be a free for all on CAFE. Good, bad, strategies, whatever.

BTW. I'm not a fan.
GM was the largest company in the world...now they are ninth....that's what CAFE has done for you.
__________________
Magnuson 112HH supercharger at 7.5 psi (Virtual 9.0 liter) 600hp 1 of 2 torrid/red int /A4/05 555r 275/40/R17's Nitto Extreme Drags 1.7 60 ft Car runs high 11's No other mods. I got the first 112HH Magnuson blower ported for a GTO. Now it appears it was also one of the last....



http://www.ribbonprinting.com http://www.personalizedawarenessribbons.com
Wm Holden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2008, 05:26 PM   #12
Vash


 
Drives: 00 Blazer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 5,104
Camaro 6, your performance electric vehicle.

Tired of that old volt? Prius got you down and slow?

Step up to the 2016 Camaro 6. 0-60 sub 4 seconds (electric motor).


Anyway .. that will probably happen.
Vash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-2008, 09:01 PM   #13
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crazy Coast
Posts: 15,201
WOW, there's a lot of useful information in this thread. Although it explains a lot of what is going on, it doesn't make me feel any better.

Thanks for all the information guys.
__________________

'20 ZL1 Black "Fury"
A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor
Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2008, 04:00 AM   #14
Punk_rider

 
Punk_rider's Avatar
 
Drives: VW Typ 166 + Black 1LE
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 763
Quote:
Originally Posted by diarmadhi View Post
Yes it does, BUT the hitch is a number (i think its 20,000). If you sell less than that quantity in TOTAL company sales in the USA then you are exempt from CAFE.

Ferrari generally only makes about about that many cars for the world in total a year... so yea they qualify for the exemption... Porsche on the other hand is completely screwed and from the rumors I've heard is contemplating pulling out the US market COMPLETELY...
HERE IS THE SOLUTION! Remove the bowtie, make "Z28" a specific branch of GM and make a limited edition! ... Ok, price will follow though ...

We the heck had the original idea of this stupid regulation?

Other solution: make a bunch of electric cars, no oil consumed, then you can make hipo cars.

damn, greens are killing the car industry ... how many people are gonna loose their jobs because of that?
__________________
I'm kindly asking: "May I have a supercharged Z28 with 550 hp please? By the end of 2009 would be awesome. Thanks"
Punk_rider is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New CAFE rules affect makers differently camaro5 General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 3 04-29-2008 08:55 AM
Finally Some Positive CAFE opinions stovt001 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 37 03-07-2008 04:18 AM
35 MPG CAFE std. almost law Scotsman General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 35 12-21-2007 11:00 AM
Interesting article about the CAFE issues MerF General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 0 08-06-2007 04:29 PM
Iacocca rips auto industry, warns: Don't sell Chrysler KILLER74Z28 General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 6 04-13-2007 11:38 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.