06-28-2009, 09:06 PM | #155 |
Go Blue!!!!!
Drives: 2012 Cruze LT Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 23,290
|
|
06-28-2009, 09:13 PM | #156 |
06-28-2009, 09:34 PM | #157 | |
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 529
|
Quote:
Camaro1, some constructive critisizm here(not knocking what you are saying, just trying to correct the claims a bit), this is not true about the torque converter locking hurting performance, it is the complete opposite. When the converter is locked, you will be putting out more horsepower at the rear wheels in an automatic transmission. Your stock torque converter has a twin disc lock up clutch, so the stock calibration will command it to lock up at WOT in some scenarios which actually makes it faster. The thing you can not see in HPTuners and probably better off some people can't because if you alter it you can really mess things up is the PWM (Pulse Width Modulated) functions. The lock up transitions are pulsed in some secnarios making it lock up by a certain percentage, so it is not always locked 100%, but we do not have access to these parameters which is why if you try to run a Precision triple disc lock up converter it will shutter and not run so good on the street unless you tell it not to lock up anymore. Please read my post here: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showth...t=29771&page=2 for some more information on why you may be experiencing poor performnce out of your L99 Camaro. |
|
06-28-2009, 09:44 PM | #158 |
Drives: 550+RWHP 2010 camaro Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 1,588
|
somewhat true,, but if your converter is locked up at slow speeds you are no longer multiplying torque
__________________
415ci stroker, TVS 2300 Magnacharger, cnc heads, cam, yank ss3200 converter, Kooks long tubes, Bwoody true cold air kit, ZL1 Pump, magnaflow 3" cat-back, lowering springs,BMR control arms and tie rod bars, 3.73 gears, diff mounts, RX can, ADM fuel controller
|
06-28-2009, 09:55 PM | #159 |
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 529
|
It makes more power through the entire rpm band with the converter locked, just doesn't come off the line as hard if it is locked there, which the stock calibration obviously doesn't have it locked there.
A race car would not want a converter locked up like this, but these guys are having problems with their stock camaro, this function actually makes their stock camaro faster. I have done a ton of testing with our project G8 (this I tested/learned over a year ago), and it has the same trans functions(slightly different trans tune), and I tried runing it unlocked down the track entirely, guess what I ran 1.5 tenths slower and 1.5 miles per hour slower with the stock converter last year. I've been tuning these 6 speed autos for a while and have done a lot of testing. I just don't want incorrect info posted online because then my customers are going to ask me to do the wrong thing due to something online. It's great that you are putting up info for people to learn, I am just simply correcting an incorrect accusation based on the testing I have done so noone is mislead, not trying to make you look bad or anything. Guys please read my posts in the other thread as well. Last edited by mike@newera; 06-28-2009 at 10:08 PM. |
07-01-2009, 01:06 AM | #160 |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT M6 Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 1,256
|
Leatherneck,
You said you have to know how to ride a bike to get it to perform, same goes for a high HP car. It takes a lot of learning to get a 4k lb car, IRS, 400 HP, A6 car down the track with a decent time. Cant just buckle up and take it to sub 13.5s. Got to learn what the car likes and how itll react. One of the other guys had the exact same problem as you and he complained enough to get it fixed. Again, guys with a "slow" L99 just give it time. GM probably put a SUPER ugly tune in the car just because they didnt have much time with it and will update the PCM and TCM sometime soon with enough people complaining. |
07-01-2009, 02:34 PM | #161 |
|
Mike: What is the best technique to launch the car to have the converter operating at optimal performace. Do you think some of these slow times can be attributed to the launch shifting the converter to a different performace?
__________________
Used Racing Brake 2 Peice Rotors for sale:
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=344754 Summit White 2014 2SS 1LE Recaros, NPP exhaust, Nav 2010 2SS A6 - sold. |
07-01-2009, 10:52 PM | #162 |
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 529
|
It's not going to make a huge deal, a good launch verses an average launch in the auto with the stock converter is maybe 1 tenth of a second, a bad launch is unpredictable I guess. The launch shouldn't have anything to do with any of the shifting unless you load it so high it spins all the way through first gear (almost like a brake stand).
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Magnaflow 2010 Camaro SS Systems | JDP Motorsports | V8 Bolt-Ons & Tunes | 61 | 12-12-2009 12:13 PM |
Ambient lighting (ABL) - the FINAL update = LIMITED TO DOOR PANELS | CamaroScotty | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 338 | 04-15-2009 05:33 PM |
Automobilemag.com: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro - Q&A | Scotsman | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 23 | 10-12-2008 12:13 AM |
AW: New Camaro a one trick pony? | Scotsman | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 16 | 09-04-2008 09:07 PM |
2010 Chevy Camaro to offer two V6s at launch; Z28 to trump SS? | radz28 | Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics | 51 | 06-23-2008 12:12 PM |