Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


View Poll Results: What is the Camaro's weakest link?
Camaro SS lower grill 10 6.13%
Must buy a package to get a single option 26 15.95%
Camaro weight 61 37.42%
0-60 time; 1/4 mile time 14 8.59%
Radio 10 6.13%
SS front bumper scoop (Mail slot) 6 3.68%
Camaro SS front bumper 7 4.29%
Potential price (I think it will be too expensive) 30 18.40%
Mpg on the V8 18 11.04%
Mpg on the V6 8 4.91%
They don't offer the color I really wanted 4 2.45%
Currently not offering Z28 27 16.56%
Trunk space 5 3.07%
Interior 5 3.07%
It doesn't really turn into giant alien robot with cannons 62 38.04%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 163. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-24-2008, 12:40 AM   #43
camaro_burns_all
 
Drives: 04 Pathfinder
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: New York
Posts: 49
The Weight is a big issue. Its causing to lag the true performance of this car. 422hp car should not be doing only 13.4 in the 1/4th
camaro_burns_all is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2008, 06:21 AM   #44
Cubanaso
Follower of CHRIST!
 
Cubanaso's Avatar
 
Drives: 2005 Mazda RX8
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Central FL
Posts: 299
^also, with gas it is hurting the fuel economy significantly and that's a double wammy.
__________________
A GM V8 in every home....
Cubanaso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2008, 08:47 AM   #45
Beelzebubba
cheap plastic member
 
Beelzebubba's Avatar
 
Drives: Mazda6s
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Arlington
Posts: 216
Poll option 16:

That this ugly beast is the best they could do for the Firebird version. (that they won't build anyway so it doesn't matter.)

Beelzebubba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2008, 09:02 AM   #46
2K05GT
Muscle Car Fanatic
 
Drives: 2017 Shelby GT350
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beelzebubba View Post
Poll option 16:

That this ugly beast is the best they could do for the Firebird version. (that they won't build anyway so it doesn't matter.)

+1

I was hoping for a Trans AM / Firebird :-(

My Most important one is ....







It doesn't really turn into a giant alien robot complete with cannons!


The Rest of the car is AWESOME !!!!
__________________
2017 Shelby GT350, Ruby Red, H6088
2017 Camaro SS, Hyper Blue Metallic
2016 Taurus SHO, Tuxedo Black
2005 Mustang GT, Mineral Grey - Sold
2K05GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2008, 09:52 AM   #47
Mr. Wyndham
I used to be Dragoneye...
 
Mr. Wyndham's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 ZL1 1LE
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 31,876
Send a message via AIM to Mr. Wyndham
Quote:
Originally Posted by camaro_burns_all View Post
The Weight is a big issue. Its causing to lag the true performance of this car. 422hp car should not be doing only 13.4 in the 1/4th
Those numbers (and the rest of the numbers in the article you found them in) are incorrect.
__________________
"Keep the faith." - Fbodfather
Mr. Wyndham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2008, 06:54 AM   #48
Cubanaso
Follower of CHRIST!
 
Cubanaso's Avatar
 
Drives: 2005 Mazda RX8
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Central FL
Posts: 299
I'm giving a Corbert BUMP to this....lol

So far, 36% says it all...while realistically, I don't think much can be done from now to production.

BUT, since Ford is talking about lowering the weight of the Mustang GM probably should listen.
__________________
A GM V8 in every home....
Cubanaso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2008, 08:16 AM   #49
96CAMaro
 
96CAMaro's Avatar
 
Drives: '02 Impreza 2.5RS
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 304
What concerns me:

1) Weight, weight, weight (should be < 3650lbs)
2) Potentail price of the Camaro (should be < 28.5K for ss)
3) Fuel economy (should be > 26mpg)
96CAMaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2008, 08:26 AM   #50
96CAMaro
 
96CAMaro's Avatar
 
Drives: '02 Impreza 2.5RS
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 304
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubanaso View Post
I'm giving a Corbert BUMP to this....lol

So far, 36% says it all...while realistically, I don't think much can be done from now to production.

BUT, since Ford is talking about lowering the weight of the Mustang GM probably should listen.
If this is truly the case and the Ford Mustang GT becomes faster than it already is and GM does nothing about the Camaros weight and performance, then I am finished with the Camaro. Maybe I'll get me a used Corvette or GTO. Don't get me wrong, I'm a die hard Camaro fan through and through - but there has to be a point where I draw the line.
96CAMaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2008, 11:03 AM   #51
Cubanaso
Follower of CHRIST!
 
Cubanaso's Avatar
 
Drives: 2005 Mazda RX8
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Central FL
Posts: 299
^as always, let's see what the end results are but like you it's my main sticking point. Heck...might be the only one other than the space inside which is not a huge gripe.
__________________
A GM V8 in every home....
Cubanaso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2008, 11:14 AM   #52
Mr. Wyndham
I used to be Dragoneye...
 
Mr. Wyndham's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 ZL1 1LE
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 31,876
Send a message via AIM to Mr. Wyndham
It HAS to be heavy. We've been over this billions of times (regulations, platform, etc). So good luck finding a decent car at this price that tips the scales at significantly lower...

But has it been mentioned yet that this is NOT your average G8 platform? That they changed the front end among other things on Camaro...and that the car does not FEEL like it's heavy?
__________________
"Keep the faith." - Fbodfather
Mr. Wyndham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2008, 11:56 AM   #53
Nickdago
 
Drives: 01 Z06 08 CTS 07 Avy LTZ
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 406
Quote:
Originally Posted by scorpio View Post
My biggest issues:

1. Does not follow the concept body shape (proportions are all different) :upset:
2. Can't stand the SS bumper
3. Not happy that the tail lights do not have the afterburner look
4. Don't understand why it will take 12 months to integrate the HUD into the car?

Nevertheless I still like the car.

Agree. lets talk about what happened to my Camaro, they lost the coke bottle look that made this car spectacular and replaced it with a much less destinct and common look. It was so sexy and mean looking and now it is like it got de-clawed.
Nickdago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2008, 12:13 PM   #54
Robert91RS

 
Robert91RS's Avatar
 
Drives: Everywhere
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: TX
Posts: 852
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragoneye View Post
It HAS to be heavy. We've been over this billions of times (regulations, platform, etc). So good luck finding a decent car at this price that tips the scales at significantly lower...

But has it been mentioned yet that this is NOT your average G8 platform? That they changed the front end among other things on Camaro...and that the car does not FEEL like it's heavy?
I give up. Some people are just ignorant. It has been repeated so many times now!

Quote:
Agree. lets talk about what happened to my Camaro, they lost the coke bottle look that made this car spectacular and replaced it with a much less destinct and common look. It was so sexy and mean looking and now it is like it got de-clawed.
Nickado, I feel like you have been let down and maybe the camaro just won't be good enough for you because your complaints have been explained time and time again. Just the vibe I'm getting.
Robert91RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2008, 12:23 PM   #55
Nickdago
 
Drives: 01 Z06 08 CTS 07 Avy LTZ
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Golden, CO
Posts: 406
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert91RS View Post
I give up. Some people are just ignorant. It has been repeated so many times now!



Nickado, I feel like you have been let down and maybe the camaro just won't be good enough for you because your complaints have been explained time and time again. Just the vibe I'm getting.
Agree. I was so excited and now not. I was really hoping they would build the concept with the same look but I guess not.

I guess it might seem I am unhappy because I was also so head over heals in love with the concept, which makes my dissapointment that much more. I mean I have been to the car shows, talked about it and hoped for it for a long time.
Nickdago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2008, 12:30 PM   #56
SoFlaZ

 
SoFlaZ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 SS LS3
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: WPB FL
Posts: 947
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickdago View Post
Agree. lets talk about what happened to my Camaro, they lost the coke bottle look that made this car spectacular and replaced it with a much less destinct and common look. It was so sexy and mean looking and now it is like it got de-clawed.
It's exactly the same shape wise? The lines may not be as protruding as what you might be thinking, but it was a CONCEPT. Minus the minor grill and tail changes that are different, they can be fixed with an RS package.
SoFlaZ is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Camaro's lineup? .Hack 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 66 10-13-2008 07:06 AM
80,000-100,000 Camaros per year Txturbo Camaro Price | Ordering | Tracking | Dealers Discussions 28 08-16-2008 11:44 PM
LA Times: Design Changes Delay Camaro's Return to the Muscle-Car Race JustinZS 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 36 04-01-2008 05:15 PM
New photos of two prototype Camaros shipped into LAX Airport ! cesmieu Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery 96 02-09-2008 10:06 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.