Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
TireRack
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Technical Camaro Topics > Suspension / Brakes / Chassis


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-15-2011, 02:46 PM   #1
parietta
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 12
Subframe Bushing Inserts - BMR, Pedders, Prothane, Energy, etc.???

Anybody out there have personal experience with either the Prothane or Energy Suspension polyurethane cradle to subframe bushings? I really want to eliminate the rear suspension movement on my 2011 SS and believe this is the best first step from what I've read. After the bushings I intend to replace the trailing arms, toe links and rear sway bar. My question is which bushings should I go with? From a pricing standpoint I have seen prices from a low of $120 for the Energy Suspension bushings to a high of $265 for the Pedder's version with the others falling in between for what look to be essentially the same product. Does anyone know what the differences are? On a daily driver with the occassional autoX or track day, does it really matter? I've always been a firm believer in "you get what you pay for" but in this particular situation with a price spread of more than a 100%, I'm just not sure which way to go. Any personal experiences and/or advice would be much appreciated. Thanks
parietta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2011, 03:05 PM   #2
2quick

 
Drives: none
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: in the front
Posts: 1,145
We have and sell the energy suspension bushings. we have had them on the car for over a year with no problems.
This link is whet we were doing with them last weekend.
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=140415

some more things we were doing with them.




They seem to be working. They are not harsh or noisy.
2quick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2011, 03:13 PM   #3
flyby

 
Drives: 2010 Silver SS
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Glen Gardner, NJ
Posts: 1,339
Got pedders xa drag pack which is full bushings and coilovers. Absolutely love them. Would recommend them to all.
flyby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2011, 03:21 PM   #4
caverman


 
caverman's Avatar
 
Drives: '69 SS Convertible
Join Date: May 2009
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 7,111
Are you trying to get rid of wheel hop? If so, I would do trailing arms first. When I first took my car to the track I got tons of hop. I then put on som TA and it all went away on the line. I still get an occassional hop from 2nd to 3rd but I'm going to address that with the Hotchkis chassis brace or some craddle inserts.

For inserts I've been looking at BMR but I probably should look at Energy as well.
__________________
-2010 Camaro 2SS | M6 | VR w/White Stripes | 1 3/4" KOOKS - 3" Magnaflow | LPE 3.91 gears | ADM tuned | Halltech w/ADM Scoop | Spohn/BMR Trailing Arm/Toe Rod | BC Coilovers| Pedders FE4 ZL1 swaybars | Cradle/Diff/Radius Rod bushings | VMax TB | Morimoto Projectors | MGW shifter | Red Calipers
Build Journal
caverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2011, 04:16 PM   #5
blake-b


 
blake-b's Avatar
 
Drives: 2009 ZR1
Join Date: May 2010
Location: KCMO
Posts: 3,205
I've got the energy suspension full bushings. I am quite pleased with them.
blake-b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2011, 05:45 PM   #6
camaro4mybday
"Camaro Joe"
 
camaro4mybday's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SILVER ICE 2LT/RS CAMARO
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: long island ny
Posts: 2,366
Send a message via AIM to camaro4mybday
not only do i sell pedders i use pedders and the products are second to none
camaro4mybday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2011, 04:16 PM   #7
BMR guy
 
BMR guy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 1SS
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by parietta View Post
Anybody out there have personal experience with either the Prothane or Energy Suspension polyurethane cradle to subframe bushings? I really want to eliminate the rear suspension movement on my 2011 SS and believe this is the best first step from what I've read. After the bushings I intend to replace the trailing arms, toe links and rear sway bar. My question is which bushings should I go with? From a pricing standpoint I have seen prices from a low of $120 for the Energy Suspension bushings to a high of $265 for the Pedder's version with the others falling in between for what look to be essentially the same product. Does anyone know what the differences are? On a daily driver with the occassional autoX or track day, does it really matter? I've always been a firm believer in "you get what you pay for" but in this particular situation with a price spread of more than a 100%, I'm just not sure which way to go. Any personal experiences and/or advice would be much appreciated. Thanks
We do business with both Prothane and Energy Suspension and I can say that both companies make quality polyurethane. There is a big difference between bushing companies and suspension specialists however. A bushing company such as Prothane or Energy Suspension typically takes an OE suspension component, removes the OE rubber bushing and designs a poly replacement to fit that component. There is very little vehicle testing to verify results. Typically the extent of their testing is just insuring that the bushing fits properly. What we do is analyze the bushings load in it's working environment both on the street, on the road course, and at the drag strip. We test different durometer rates (bushing stiffness) in various conditions, and in many cases improve the bushing design itself. I believe this gives our bushing designs an edge over other options on the market and it is the main reason why our bushings cost a little more.

Additionally we manufacture the other suspension components you are already planning to upgrade. Sometimes it pays to stick with one brand for everything as it has been designed and tested together not only for compatability but for functionality to compliment each other. In the end you can't really go wrong with any of these companies but I just felt it was necesarry to explain what the differences were and why we are not necesarrily the lowest price in the market...
BMR guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2011, 06:23 PM   #8
flht99b

 
flht99b's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS RJT
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Knoxville
Posts: 1,584
I went with the BMR inserts instead of replacing the entire bushing. Very satisfied with the inserts ability to control the motion of the rear cradle and not transmit additional NVH to the cabin. Easier to install ( cradle still needs to be dropped down a few inches ) and less costly. For my 99% street use and 1% road course / autocross use the inserts were the right modification for me.
Ed M.
__________________
RJT 2SS/RS, AAM 3.70's, MTI Sway Bars, Shifter, SS brake lines ZLI calipers, rotors/pads BMR Trailing & Toe Arms, rear cradle/diff bushes, Pedders XA's, Camber/Toe eccentrics, Radius arm inserts, GTO clutch reservoir, LS9 cam, Comp valve springs, Melling 10296 oil pump, CR5 timing chain, LS6 damper, CAI Cold Air Intake, ARH LT headers, HF cats, GMPP axle back, Elite Eng Catch Can, Black ZL1 20x10 & 2011 whls 285/35/20 & 305/35/20 General G-Max RS, 2011 Convertible spoiler, 1LE front spoiler, Lloyd "SS" Floor Mats, GM Camaro Trunk Mat, wrapped console, hand brake lever, Grant steering whl.
flht99b is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2011, 01:15 AM   #9
Inferno LSX
Supercharged LSX
 
Inferno LSX's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS Black/Carbon Fiber
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: City of Angels
Posts: 6,741
I got Pedders ones and I'm very happy. Worked very well at C5F2. The car never felt better on the track. There is some noise and vibrations, but worth it to me. Driving on the freeway and changing lanes has a positive feel.
__________________
Inferno LSX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2011, 01:37 PM   #10
Agent WD-40
 
Agent WD-40's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: MI
Posts: 601
Quote:
Originally Posted by flht99b View Post
I went with the BMR inserts instead of replacing the entire bushing. Very satisfied with the inserts ability to control the motion of the rear cradle and not transmit additional NVH to the cabin. Easier to install ( cradle still needs to be dropped down a few inches ) and less costly. For my 99% street use and 1% road course / autocross use the inserts were the right modification for me.
Ed M.
+1. I have the BMR sub-frame insert bushings and they are great! They definitely keep the rear cradle in place. It eliminated that feeling of the car stepping out sideways on aggressive shifts (especially on 1-2 upshift).
__________________
L99 - 440 RWHP
Livernois 2c Cam & VVT/DOD Delete
Roto-Fab Intake
Stainless Works 1 7/8" Long Tube Headers
Corsa Exhaust
Agent WD-40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2011, 01:51 PM   #11
SUX2BU
Quit being a pu$$y
 
SUX2BU's Avatar
 
Drives: FAST
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sachse TX (DFW)
Posts: 5,825
Bushings are a huge pain, so I did it once and did it right. I got BMR's full line of bushings and suspension components. Like they said, they are all designed to work perfect together and it shows. Plus their customer service is second to none. They have also been around for a long time.
SUX2BU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2011, 10:05 PM   #12
BMR guy
 
BMR guy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 1SS
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 1,002
Thanks flht99b, Agent WD-40, and SUX2BU for posting your experiences!
BMR guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 01:25 PM   #13
Hess Motorsports
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2010 SS with WAY TOO MANY MODS
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Orange County CA
Posts: 128
Just a quick question....... if price isn't the deciding factor, why not go solid? I think the science has proven that the solid bushings ALWAYS outperform any urethane counterpart with littel actual increase in NVH. On ALL of our drag, road race, auto x, and street cars, even our own Camaros, we have run the solid mounts from Pfadt with incredible results.

PM me if you have any questions. We set up (installs, laser alignments, and corner scaling) about 4 to 5 Camaros per week with different suspension options depending on the specific customers needs.
Hess Motorsports is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-20-2011, 01:58 PM   #14
flht99b

 
flht99b's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS RJT
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Knoxville
Posts: 1,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hess Motorsports View Post
Just a quick question....... if price isn't the deciding factor, why not go solid? I think the science has proven that the solid bushings ALWAYS outperform any urethane counterpart with littel actual increase in NVH. On ALL of our drag, road race, auto x, and street cars, even our own Camaros, we have run the solid mounts from Pfadt with incredible results.

PM me if you have any questions. We set up (installs, laser alignments, and corner scaling) about 4 to 5 Camaros per week with different suspension options depending on the specific customers needs.
Truth be known 99% of us would gain no measurable benefit from solid sub frame mounts/bushings and I dare to say nearly as many would hate the NVH increase the solid mounts transmit. GM didn't "insulate" the rear cradle cause they had nothing better to do. If you are building a track only car or want 100% from it no matter the consequences, solid mounts / bushings are definitely the only way to go. If you want to go to the grocery store or cross country in comfort they are not.
Ed M.
__________________
RJT 2SS/RS, AAM 3.70's, MTI Sway Bars, Shifter, SS brake lines ZLI calipers, rotors/pads BMR Trailing & Toe Arms, rear cradle/diff bushes, Pedders XA's, Camber/Toe eccentrics, Radius arm inserts, GTO clutch reservoir, LS9 cam, Comp valve springs, Melling 10296 oil pump, CR5 timing chain, LS6 damper, CAI Cold Air Intake, ARH LT headers, HF cats, GMPP axle back, Elite Eng Catch Can, Black ZL1 20x10 & 2011 whls 285/35/20 & 305/35/20 General G-Max RS, 2011 Convertible spoiler, 1LE front spoiler, Lloyd "SS" Floor Mats, GM Camaro Trunk Mat, wrapped console, hand brake lever, Grant steering whl.
flht99b is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
bushings, subframe connectors chassis, wheel hop


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
5th Gen Suspension -- The Book JusticePete Suspension / Brakes / Chassis 151 05-07-2015 06:52 PM
Subframe Bush Upgrades. From Simple DIYer to Full Race Capable Info@PeddersUSA.com Suspension / Brakes / Chassis 16 05-03-2010 10:29 PM
New to Suspension (look over list please) Brokenlizrd Suspension / Brakes / Chassis 19 04-24-2010 12:31 AM
Pedders Suspension Benchmark Track Testing and New Jersey Track Day Info@PeddersUSA.com USA - NY / NJ / PA 35 10-26-2009 06:20 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.