Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Vararam
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-30-2007, 11:40 AM   #1
CamaroFever
 
CamaroFever's Avatar
 
Drives: Its in my sig "2002 Galant V6"
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Memphis
Posts: 28
Send a message via Yahoo to CamaroFever
Leg room & front tag spot???

One more thing that I am worried about is leg room. IM 6'2" and I just watched a video on youtube and the guy seemed like he was a lil cramped in the driver seat.

ALso I dont live up north, but I noticed that there is not a place for your tags at the front of the car forthose who have to have them in the front and back.I understand its just a concept car, just a few things that i noticed.

Fast Foward to 5'00 to see his legs while sitting in the car


However, I love this car soooo much already that I will deal with it "IF" it is a bit cramp.
__________________
CamaroFever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 12:13 PM   #2
TAG UR IT
www.Camaro5store.com
 
TAG UR IT's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 ZL1 #705
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SA, Texas
Posts: 26,544
I'm 603 myself. I was told it was a little cramped for those who drove it earlier, but hopefully the push that seat back just a bit.
TAG UR IT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 12:35 PM   #3
CamaroFever
 
CamaroFever's Avatar
 
Drives: Its in my sig "2002 Galant V6"
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Memphis
Posts: 28
Send a message via Yahoo to CamaroFever
Did they say if it was cramped to the point where is was uncomfortable to drive?

I dont want to pick up a hot chick and then she gets in and see this tall guy all uncomfortable and contorted in the drivers seat.That would not be cool
__________________
CamaroFever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 01:11 PM   #4
Emher
Pillaging Viking
 
Drives: Saab 9-5 '99 (Hey it's a GM!)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 1,189
Send a message via MSN to Emher Send a message via Yahoo to Emher Send a message via Skype™ to Emher
I'm thinking it will be okay. The overall proportions seems to be about the dimensions of the drivers space in my Saab and I got a bit of room to spare, and I'm 6'3".
Emher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 03:41 PM   #5
stovt001


 
stovt001's Avatar
 
Drives: 2006 Cobalt, 2004 Taurus wagon
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 3,810
I hate imagining how it will look with a license plate up front. Stupid communist fascist California lawmakers. [grumbles]. :fighting0040:
stovt001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 04:34 PM   #6
garfin
Resident Disciple
 
garfin's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 CTS-V 6MN '98 Camaro SS (Sold)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Roches Point, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 607
Quote:
Originally Posted by TAG UR IT View Post
I'm 603 myself. I was told it was a little cramped for those who drove it earlier, but hopefully the push that seat back just a bit.
I think everybody will be pleasantly surprised by the amount of legroom in both the front and the back seat, if the Concept's interior is any indication of what the production interior will be.
Keeping in mind that it is not a production vehicle, I can tell you that the manual mechanism for adjusting the driver's seat is a royal PITA! So much so, that I gave up trying to adjust it when I drove it... and I'm sure I wasn't the only one who gave up! (You don't wanna know what has to be done to put gas in the thing!!) I'm 6'1" and like to sit a little closer in a manual car than in an auto (for clutch feel), and I got used to the position I was in very quickly. Other people who had more patience than I had that day were able to slide the seat back quite a bit.
The really good news is that the amount of back seat leg room was a very pleasant surprise, and I hope GM is able to maintain the back seat configuration in the production model.

Best regardSS,

Elie
__________________
2010 Cadillac CTS-V 6MN Thunder Gray
1998 Camaro SS # C079 SOLD
garfin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 05:14 PM   #7
stovt001


 
stovt001's Avatar
 
Drives: 2006 Cobalt, 2004 Taurus wagon
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 3,810
Yeah, recall that the tracks for the front seats are mounted a little ways up on the center console and door sills rather than the floor to improve rear seat leg room. Steps like that probably indicate creating good passenger space is on the designer's mind.
stovt001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 05:44 PM   #8
Jay
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Drives: Audi A4
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Van City, Canada
Posts: 429
Quote:
Originally Posted by stovt001 View Post
I hate imagining how it will look with a license plate up front. Stupid communist fascist California lawmakers. [grumbles]. :fighting0040:
Oh good gawd..... same here..... I really don't wanna have to stick that ugly plate on the front...
__________________

"HEAVEN JUST COULDN'T HANDLE ALL THE NOISE"
JAY
Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 07:39 PM   #9
Jeff
~ANTI-FORD~
 
Jeff's Avatar
 
Drives: Cadillac CTS
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 608
Send a message via MSN to Jeff
Quote:
Originally Posted by stovt001 View Post
I hate imagining how it will look with a license plate up front. Stupid communist fascist California lawmakers. [grumbles]. :fighting0040:
If my dad gets one or I some how do.. I'm sure we won't put one on the front lol. But then again Tag will give me a ticket
__________________
My Z28

sorry guys.. sold Camaro and got a Cadillac CTS, waiting for a few years to get a 2010 SS used ;]
Jeff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 07:54 PM   #10
Warghost
 
Drives: Camaros & Mustangs
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Port St Lucie, FL.
Posts: 168
Florida requires no front license plate, and it's always bugged me that there's the indented area on the front fascia of my Mustang for one.
Warghost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 08:36 PM   #11
stovt001


 
stovt001's Avatar
 
Drives: 2006 Cobalt, 2004 Taurus wagon
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 3,810
Hmm, yeah, thats annoying, having separate standards. Some cars don't have built in front license plat spots, so they're just bolted on the front in states that requite them and it looks awkward (like the Cobalt, Camaro, and Corvette). On the other hand, cars like the Mustang have a section built in, like you said, and in states that don't require front plates, it just looks awkward. All states should go to a single rear plate standard. So much better that way.
stovt001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 09:07 PM   #12
EllwynX


 
EllwynX's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 2,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by stovt001 View Post
Hmm, yeah, thats annoying, having separate standards. Some cars don't have built in front license plat spots, so they're just bolted on the front in states that requite them and it looks awkward (like the Cobalt, Camaro, and Corvette). On the other hand, cars like the Mustang have a section built in, like you said, and in states that don't require front plates, it just looks awkward. All states should go to a single rear plate standard. So much better that way.

And some cars have what I consider the best compromise between the two.

The indentation for the front plate is molded in the front bumper, but it comes with a 'filler plate' that fills that void when no front plate is required.

I won't put a plate on the front of my Camaro though. I never had an issue in the past when I left it off my '00 S10 Xtreme (which had the 'filler plate').

Besides, the cops should be more worried about all the uninsured/unlicensed illegals than a missing front plate...
EllwynX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 09:46 PM   #13
stovt001


 
stovt001's Avatar
 
Drives: 2006 Cobalt, 2004 Taurus wagon
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 3,810
Amen. Yes they should, but all too often you get the guys who just love nothing better than to nail some otherwise law abiding driver for something so stupid as no front license plate. I mean I could see if red light cameras and the like took pictures only of the front of the car, but they can get the back, so I don't see how it matters.
stovt001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2007, 10:32 PM   #14
Jay
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Drives: Audi A4
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Van City, Canada
Posts: 429
Quote:
Originally Posted by stovt001 View Post
Amen. Yes they should, but all too often you get the guys who just love nothing better than to nail some otherwise law abiding driver for something so stupid as no front license plate. I mean I could see if red light cameras and the like took pictures only of the front of the car, but they can get the back, so I don't see how it matters.
Its because alotta people argue (generally and in court) that the light turned red after they crossed the light, therefore, there not running a red light. Here in Vancouver when they had red light radar's (they got taken away from most places).... you only got a ticket if the camera flashed you entering the intersection at red and then leaving... thus, two pictures of your plates... front and back showing clearly you entered the intersection on a red light and ran a red.....just thought I would shed some light on the matter....it still doesn't make wanna have the front plate though, lol.... personally, I hate it when cops sit there and give out tickets for not having plates or giving out tickets for not having your plate on the stock holder for motorcycles, etc (yes, they actually sit there and do this some days here in BC).... its like really, thats as important as your job gets.... like cummon go find something else to do... we happen to be on and off the #1 spot for car theft capital of auto.... hmmm....

sorry TAG for the popo criticism again, lol.
__________________

"HEAVEN JUST COULDN'T HANDLE ALL THE NOISE"
JAY
Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.