3/8 iceolator + Ported Manifold - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

JohnZ · 08-23-2012, 10:21 PM

Has anyone dyno'd the hp increase with the 3/8 iceolator and ported manifold? All the dyno numbers are using a combination of the 1inch and the ported manifold. Just curious because I know the 3/8 size lends itself to more hp in the higher rpms.

Lil' Nasty · 08-23-2012, 10:34 PM

Similiar gains, would be my guess, Not totally sure tho

lscamaro · 08-23-2012, 10:40 PM

You'll probably get higher hp but less tq

LVDran · 08-23-2012, 11:45 PM

I'm thinking I read that the 3/8 gave more tq than HP and the 25mm vice versa. I could be backwards though.

JohnZ · 08-24-2012, 12:07 AM

I also think the 3/8 would give more hp, but I would be curious to see how much with the Ported IM.

Yellow_Glide · 08-24-2012, 12:36 AM

Check either the vendor section under v6 bolt ons or search in this section there are dynos posted. Diff between the 3/8" and 1", both with the ported IM - the 3/8" made literally a couple hp more on the top end. the 1" made just a little more in the lower rpm. Maces Ported IM and the 1" is either 31 or 33rwhp. Going from memory but in that ballpark.

lscamaro · 08-24-2012, 01:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Yellow_Glide

Check either the vendor section under v6 bolt ons or search in this section there are dynos posted. Diff between the 3/8" and 1", both with the ported IM - the 3/8" made literally a couple hp more on the top end. the 1" made just a little more in the lower rpm. Maces Ported IM and the 1" is either 31 or 33rwhp. Going from memory but in that ballpark.

Your correct!

The mace makes more low end torque and the black ice makes more hp at the top!

2010_camaro · 08-24-2012, 01:23 AM

So witch is better for drag racing?

lscamaro · 08-24-2012, 01:27 AM

Really up to you. Just remember, torque wins races. Plus our car isn't really that slow once it gets going but its getting it out of the hole that is a challenge. I personally went with the mace for the added torque down low to do just that. Also, you can really feel the low end torque when driving on the streets. I really like that as well. Most have said that the rx really doesn't kick in until 4000 and since I'm usually never there while daily driving, I opted for the mace.

2010_camaro · 08-24-2012, 02:10 AM

where did you order the MACE and how much to the door? I have been up in the air on witch to buy. Did you port match your heads? I see you already have the Ported IM

mydreamcar · 08-24-2012, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JohnZ

Has anyone dyno'd the hp increase with the 3/8 iceolator and ported manifold? All the dyno numbers are using a combination of the 1inch and the ported manifold. Just curious because I know the 3/8 size lends itself to more hp in the higher rpms.

if you go to the dyno sticky your will see my latest dyno. I have the 3/8 iceolator and the mace ported manifold. My prior dyno was 254 before those mods on a dynometer. I then installed the 2 pieces and got 254 on a mustang dyno which the geneneral concensus is usually reads around 15-20% lower, the dyno op even told me that, so my 254 on a mustang could really be anywhere between 292 and 304 hp, plus it was 90 degrees and high humidity the day I went

SC2150 · 08-24-2012, 01:55 PM

We have both the 3/8" and 1" (1" in stock) and the diff we saw was the 1" gives 3-5 more tq down low and above 5,000 rpm it was app 14 rwhp lower than the 3/8". So get the 1" if you dont run for quickest ET at the track and the 3/8" if you do.

Sikoriko · 08-25-2012, 10:03 AM

no need to stack the spacers it doesn't work that way

08-23-2012, 10:21 PM	#1
JohnZ Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LT V6 Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: California Posts: 439	3/8 iceolator + Ported Manifold Has anyone dyno'd the hp increase with the 3/8 iceolator and ported manifold? All the dyno numbers are using a combination of the 1inch and the ported manifold. Just curious because I know the 3/8 size lends itself to more hp in the higher rpms. __________________ Injen CAI, V-Max Throttle Body, Rx 25mm Iceolator, Rx 10mm Plenum Spacer, Mace Ported Manifold, ARK N-II Catback, Trifecta Tune, Rx Catch Can. BMR Bushing Inserts,Pedders Radius Rod Inserts, Pfadt Sway Bars and Endlinks, LSR Front Subframe Brace SS Brembo Brakes, Racing Brake Stainless Lines

08-23-2012, 10:34 PM	#2
Lil' Nasty [COTW 4/13/15] Drives: Supercharged LLT Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: Florida Posts: 5,957	Similiar gains, would be my guess, Not totally sure tho __________________ LiL' Nasty's Build Journal

08-23-2012, 10:40 PM	#3
lscamaro Drives: 2011 CGM Camaro LS A6 Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: San Antonio, Texas Posts: 10,305	You'll probably get higher hp but less tq __________________ Click Picture for Build Thread

08-24-2012, 12:07 AM	#5
JohnZ Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LT V6 Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: California Posts: 439	I also think the 3/8 would give more hp, but I would be curious to see how much with the Ported IM. __________________ Injen CAI, V-Max Throttle Body, Rx 25mm Iceolator, Rx 10mm Plenum Spacer, Mace Ported Manifold, ARK N-II Catback, Trifecta Tune, Rx Catch Can. BMR Bushing Inserts,Pedders Radius Rod Inserts, Pfadt Sway Bars and Endlinks, LSR Front Subframe Brace SS Brembo Brakes, Racing Brake Stainless Lines

08-24-2012, 12:36 AM	#6
Yellow_Glide Drives: 2011 1LT "Chakita". 04 Yota Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: Round Rock, TX Posts: 823	Check either the vendor section under v6 bolt ons or search in this section there are dynos posted. Diff between the 3/8" and 1", both with the ported IM - the 3/8" made literally a couple hp more on the top end. the 1" made just a little more in the lower rpm. Maces Ported IM and the 1" is either 31 or 33rwhp. Going from memory but in that ballpark. __________________ Hi, my name is Chakita. I have cams!!!! Build thread: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?p=3847083

08-23-2012, 11:45 PM	#4
LVDran Drives: 2010 V6 Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: Las Vegas Posts: 116 View My Garage	I'm thinking I read that the 3/8 gave more tq than HP and the 25mm vice versa. I could be backwards though.

08-24-2012, 01:23 AM	#8
2010_camaro Drives: 2014 Camaro SS Join Date: May 2011 Location: Florence, KY Posts: 2,238 View My Garage	So witch is better for drag racing?

08-24-2012, 01:27 AM	#9
lscamaro Drives: 2011 CGM Camaro LS A6 Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: San Antonio, Texas Posts: 10,305	Really up to you. Just remember, torque wins races. Plus our car isn't really that slow once it gets going but its getting it out of the hole that is a challenge. I personally went with the mace for the added torque down low to do just that. Also, you can really feel the low end torque when driving on the streets. I really like that as well. Most have said that the rx really doesn't kick in until 4000 and since I'm usually never there while daily driving, I opted for the mace. __________________ Click Picture for Build Thread

08-24-2012, 02:10 AM	#10
2010_camaro Drives: 2014 Camaro SS Join Date: May 2011 Location: Florence, KY Posts: 2,238 View My Garage	where did you order the MACE and how much to the door? I have been up in the air on witch to buy. Did you port match your heads? I see you already have the Ported IM

08-24-2012, 01:55 PM	#12
SC2150 Account Suspended Drives: 2012 Camaro RS, RX supercharged Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Bradenton, FL Posts: 6,063	We have both the 3/8" and 1" (1" in stock) and the diff we saw was the 1" gives 3-5 more tq down low and above 5,000 rpm it was app 14 rwhp lower than the 3/8". So get the 1" if you dont run for quickest ET at the track and the 3/8" if you do.

08-25-2012, 10:03 AM	#13
Sikoriko Drives: 2011 V6 IOM Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: San Diego Posts: 1,385 View My Garage	no need to stack the spacers it doesn't work that way