![]() |
|
|
#1 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 ZL1 # 2195 Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 965
|
Rpepka 0-60
Ok after purchasing a stop watch here is what we have.
Given: 89 degrees with 59% humidity M sport mode with TC Off as well as Stalbilitrac Off: 5 runs between 5.73 and 5.97 The car shifts from 1st to 2nd between 5500 and 5800 rpm, WHY? other shifts at 6000. I came back and unplugged the thing right after the air filter box and the thing controlling the throttle position as well as the battery for over 15 minutes. Put everything back together and went back out. First 2 runs were at 6.4 and 6.2 after that the next 4 runs were in the high 5’s like before. From first to 2nd still shifting too early 5500 to 5800 rpm. This is still at least 1 second slower then it should be. HELP!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
![]() Drives: C6 Zed-oh-six Join Date: May 2009
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 677
|
Quote:
leave stabilitrack on, it seems to be faster that way for some reason, how many miles are on the car?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Camaro Owner Soon!
Drives: Chevrolet Cobalt SS/SC S2 GMPP Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 184
|
Quote:
I'd say your motor is not quite broken in, something is wrong with your tune or your torque converter, or possibly your brakes are "dragging". This last option is also common on the Cobalts, the parking brake is adjusted wrong and "drags" or rubs while disengaged. Those are my thoughts on your issue. If it were me, I'd take the car to a dyno and have them watch your afr, timing, etc. Something could be wrong in the tune. Also, have your brakes looked at, especially the rear. Finally, an exhaust, intake, and a good tune will wake the car up regaurdless. Good luck! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 ZL1 # 2195 Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 ZL1 # 2195 Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 965
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Drives: C6 Zed-oh-six Join Date: May 2009
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 677
|
hmmm
check out my vids if you havent already, the car seems faster without competition mode on ![]() http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=28795
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 ZL1 # 2195 Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 965
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Booooosted.
|
Quote:
Best I got was 6.2 Secs. Bonnie is laughing at me cause I won't race her. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
|
Not terrible but not good. High 5 sec 0-60mph in 100 degree heat index conditions isn't terrible by any means. Your car isn't going to run high 4s, 0-60mph in summer Florida conditons. Its just not going to happen.
Your car is also definately faster than Scott's 7.0 + sec 0-60 mph runs from his original video. You might just need some tuning to get your car where it needs to be. It could be running pig rich and out of tune. By the way my 5.2 sec 0-60mph run was done using Regular M mode (with TC off). That's all I did. I didn't put it in Competition mode. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() Drives: Black 2SS RS M6 Join Date: May 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 85
|
I don't know how much money you are willing to through at this problem but I would strongly suggest that you buy some scaning software or scanning device to begin with. You will eliminate all of this guess work. Start logging your daily driving as well as timed runs. Also for the timed runs I use a G-Timer, not a stop watch, however it is no longer mfg. You could try the Gtech www.gtechpro.com. If you are intent on solving this on your own and not involving a tuning shop then this is the way to go. Start with the diagnosing equipment mentioned then fix with tuning software or take it to a tuner. I had a very similar problem with my Vette and I was able to not only correct it but get the car screaming through the gears.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Booooosted.
|
Quote:
Hell, the V6 gets that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
|
Quote:
These 6.0 + sec 0-60mph times shouldn't be happening. It seems there's some tuning issues going on. I don't think GM got the tuning right on some of the L99s. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Geek
Drives: IOM 2010 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Orlando
Posts: 4,451
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Booooosted.
|
Well, whatever the problem is here, I'm highly disapointed. Got my wife and her IS350 laughing at me. I don't even want to drive it right now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|