![]() |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro SS A6 Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Brighton, MI
Posts: 190
|
long tubes with high flow cats
Can anyone give me an idea/opinion on how much hp/tq can be gained with the addition of long tubes w/high flow cats on an A6?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Donkey Dick Cam Camaro
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS LS3 M6 Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,998
|
the number will vary from dyno to dyno, engine condition/health, but 35ish rwhp increase is kind of normal
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
__________________
Bone Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Donkey Dick Cam Camaro
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS LS3 M6 Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,998
|
***assuming you're gonna tune for it as well
Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk
__________________
Bone Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Keeper of “THE list”
|
25-45 rwhp. With a 2010 L99 car, you should be seeing somewhere in the 360-370 rwhp and 380-400 rwtq. My car made 365hp/390tq with long tube headers, cold air intake, ported throttle body, and catback exhaust.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() |
I plan on putting on headers myself, but I'm not sure if I want to wait to have it tuned because of future mods (Don't want to pay to have it tuned, then a week later tuned again). My question is, can you install headers and just not tune for some time till your ready or is this bad on your engine? CEL (02 sensors, not a huge deal)? Anything? Just curious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
![]() Drives: 2010 2SS Coupe; 2011 2LT Vert Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Prosper, TX
Posts: 458
|
Quote:
From what I've heard, contrary to what happens when you put headers on an older carburetor car, your car will run much richer. I believe this may be due to moving the O2 sensors further downstream which makes the computer compensate more. Others will correct me if I am wrong though. If you are more than a week out from your other mods though, I would certainly go ahead and get a tune. Most tuners I know of in my area offer dyno tuning by the hour after they unlock the computer. My tuner charges me $125 an hour for any dyno time required since he did my original tune. Give your tuner a call and see what they recommend and how much he'd charge for initial tune and subsequent tuning mods for other upgrades.
__________________
2010 2SS/RS LS3 - K&N, GM Performance Axle Back, Hurst Shifter, TSP 1 7/8ths long tubes no cats, TSP Stage 2 "Bald Eagle" cam, GM 3.91, 466whp/429tq
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Keeper of “THE list”
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
weSS1LEy
Drives: 2015 camaro 2ss/rs/1le Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Kelowna
Posts: 510
|
I drove without a tune for a while with headers. I did open it up a couple times. In retrospect I probably shouldn’t have risked running lean anywhere in the rpm range. You should tune as soon as possible unless you’re good about not beating on it
__________________
Rotofab, arh no cats, atak, elite cc, 94 octane tune, Mobil 1, phastek scoop, custom cam 230/243 .621 .604 114+4, related cam kit stuff. 470/435 rwhp/rwtq
Last edited by weSS1LEy; 05-16-2019 at 09:59 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() |
I would like to boost eventually, but I'm not 100% sure yet what all I'll still want to do after headers. Very possible a cam, but I'm still iffy about that with the pros and cons of what they have to offer. I guess I was exaggerating "a week" hahah, it will def be longer than a week. I have 2010 ss. Is a vehicle running rich bad for the engine? Or does that just mean bad fuel economy or?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
![]() Drives: 2010 2SS Coupe; 2011 2LT Vert Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Prosper, TX
Posts: 458
|
Quote:
Also, you'll find worlds of conflicting information on the internet about whether or not your car will run richer or leaner with headers and no tune. Either condition can be dangerous. I think the only way for you to know for sure what your car is doing, is by getting it tuned. The tuner should be able to tell you AFRs before he makes modifications. Oh and my vote is to get a cam and boost... why just do one when you can to do both. Seriously though, a cam is a good place to start. Depending on how crazy you go, you can pick up a good 50whp give or take. And if you know you want to go boost in the future, get a boost cam to start with and save the trouble of swapping it out a second time.
__________________
2010 2SS/RS LS3 - K&N, GM Performance Axle Back, Hurst Shifter, TSP 1 7/8ths long tubes no cats, TSP Stage 2 "Bald Eagle" cam, GM 3.91, 466whp/429tq
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Donkey Dick Cam Camaro
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS LS3 M6 Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,998
|
Quote:
You can drive it easy but it will definitely ping up top a tune is cheaper than a burnt valve or piston
__________________
Bone Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() Drives: 2010 2SS Coupe; 2011 2LT Vert Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Prosper, TX
Posts: 458
|
I am a big fan of Texas Speed personally. They offer a variety of stages for their boost cams which are variations of their NA cams. The main differences are they a wider LSA and less intake and exhaust duration than their NA counterparts. They make slightly less power in NA form than the NA cams because they don't breathe as well as the NA cams. Conversely, they allow less boost loss because there is less overlap in the intake and exhaust valves being open.
There are certainly a bunch of other quality CAM companies out there like GPI that get great reviews from the guys on this forum. I am not sure if they have boost specific applications but others can chime in on that as well.
__________________
2010 2SS/RS LS3 - K&N, GM Performance Axle Back, Hurst Shifter, TSP 1 7/8ths long tubes no cats, TSP Stage 2 "Bald Eagle" cam, GM 3.91, 466whp/429tq
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|