![]() |
|
|
#1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 ZL1 Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,165
|
Help with dyno numbers
I pretty sure this should be posted somewhere else but I don't know where the stickied thread is for L99's. But here goes I dynoed my car along with my 2 friends yesterday a E90 M3 and a C6 Z06 I have a 2SS LS3. All cars are stock and was one on a Mustang Dyno it was a fourth gear power pull. The M3 went first and dynoed as expected 335 rwhp average which is about right since he has 414 to the crank. I went next and the first pull 414 rwhp then the tech was like its suppose to be 426 to the crank right I said yes so he pulled it again. The second pull was 428 and the third was 429 rwhp weird. The tech said "you have a very strong motor and I need a tune AFR is off". The Z06 went next and he dynoed an average 495 rwhp again weird because he has 505hp to the crank. We then put the M3 back on and he dynoed 335 rwhp. Here is the the 2 print out the tech gave me. What do you guys think
![]()
__________________
Elite Design Concepts NY5THGEN2017 ZL1 Garnet Red/M6/// IG @Crazl1
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
|
Find a different dyno.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 ZL1 Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,165
|
I have always used a dyno just as a base for my mods but I know these numbers are crazy. We are planning another dyno with the same cars again. Its just weird how the M3 was right and the 2 anerican cars were basically putting out the crank power. I wonder if anyone else has experience this?
__________________
Elite Design Concepts NY5THGEN2017 ZL1 Garnet Red/M6/// IG @Crazl1
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Drives: 2015 Green Flash 2SS M6 Join Date: May 2009
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 352
|
The Mustang Dynos usually show a lower number compared to the Dynojets. This is really weird.
__________________
Back in the Game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 CAMARO. 10.04@133mph, 1.4 60' Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lafayette, Louisiana
Posts: 4,585
|
either the dyno was wrong or your camaro is a freak that came with a 500+ hp motor from the factory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Motor Head
Drives: CTS-V Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: So MD
Posts: 494
|
Looks to me like these are uncorrected values (not corrected to SAE standard day weather conditions). If you have the temp, humidity, and baro press for the pulls I will correct the numbers to see if it is more believable.
__________________
History Camaro's: 83, 93, 95, 98, & 10.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Motor Head
Drives: CTS-V Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: So MD
Posts: 494
|
Using recorded weather information on your Zip code, the temp was 44 F, 47% RH, and 29.85 in hg baro press. Those numbers calc a SAE HP correction factor of 0.9447.
0.9447 x 414 = 391 SAE Corrected HP
__________________
History Camaro's: 83, 93, 95, 98, & 10.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 529
|
Mustang dynos can be calibrated to read higher or lower dyno numbers. Don't worry about the dyno number, it is better used as a tuning tool. Just note that if you put an intake and headers on your car, you might want to go back to the same dyno to get dyno'd again or you might be disappointed in your "dyno numbers" somewhere else.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Drives: 1999 Trans Am Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Bridgewater,Ma
Posts: 2,018
|
I have the same dyno and would say they either don't have a built in weather station or they screwed with the settings too much.A stock Z06 is ussually 440-460rwhp,so I'm going by that.Also there are settings that have to go in to load the car.If they are wrong the #'s are off.
Also,they need to print the graphs better.There is no need to have the A/F bouncing all over the graph when in truth it is only 11.6-1 A/F jumping to 12-1 A/F. Makes it look alot worse than it actually is. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 ZL1 Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,165
|
Thanks for the SAE HP correction. You are right they never factored the weather in because the dyno is in some type of a vacuum camber we wanted them to leave the door open so I can hear the car wide open but the tech said no he is gonna loose vacuum.
__________________
Elite Design Concepts NY5THGEN2017 ZL1 Garnet Red/M6/// IG @Crazl1
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2017 ZL1 Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,165
|
Quote:
__________________
Elite Design Concepts NY5THGEN2017 ZL1 Garnet Red/M6/// IG @Crazl1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Search Ninja
Drives: 2010 Black 2SS/RS A6 Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central Ark
Posts: 7,183
|
Quote:
__________________
2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Halltech CF 102 fed GPI modded intake manifold Bo (knows) White ported TB Kooks LT's/ Dynomax VT Pfadted (springs/sways) Dyno tuned by Rhino and GPI I once parallel parked a train. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
|
Mustang Dyno's are definately better for tuning, but they have too many variables that have to be set in order for them to read correctly. DynoJets are usually what you'll see posted online and are more comparable to one another.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Your Dyno numbers | PieNsky | Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 349 | 06-19-2011 01:53 AM |
| Pre-Camaro5 FEST...FREE TUNING & DYNO TIME!! | Qwkss | V8 Bolt-Ons & Tunes | 2 | 01-28-2010 12:54 AM |
| Pre-Camaro5 FEST, FREE DYNO & TUNE SPECIAL!! | Qwkss | USA - Southeast | 1 | 01-28-2010 12:17 AM |
| DYNO, INSTALL, DYNO, TUNE, DYNO | JANNETTYRACING | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 20 | 11-17-2009 06:11 PM |
| Stock vs. HTR600 427 dyno numbers! | Redline Motorsports | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 21 | 08-31-2009 05:29 PM |