![]() |
|
|
#1 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS - L99 - CGM Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 849
|
FAST intake manifold is garbage!
way too expensive and does not put out the advertised gains!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 18 ZL1 A10 Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South East, FL
Posts: 3,023
|
__________________
2017 ZL1 M6 Bog City, 2013 ZL1 M6, 2010 2SS M6
ZL1::J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Whipped
|
what type of research have you done to make these claims?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Drives: My Two Feet Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 144
|
If I'm correct you really won't see the optimun potiential of the fast intake manifold until you get cams and heads or some type of forced induction. If you just have basic boltons then you will be lucky to get 15hp out of it. What all do you have on your car right now?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
BAMF SS
|
welcome to 2002.
IMHO, on these engines, a ported stocker goes A LOONNNGG way. I wouldn't even consider a FAST intake, unless I had at least a > stock displacement engine. And even at that level, it would have to depend on the setup. But for stock bottom end with heads/cam/fi/nitrous... I'd stick to a ported ls3 intake any day of the week.
__________________
2016 1SS A8: FBO + Circle D + P1X + Meth + Tuned by Pray Performance
Stock Longblock 800 SAE rwhp. 9.4 @ 145 mph. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
2010 Camaro 2 SS/RS M6
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS/RS Join Date: May 2009
Location: Clayton Delaware
Posts: 1,218
|
This is not news
__________________
Forged LS3, FED M311 heads, CAI Inc, ARH 1 7/8, Corsa Xtreme, Taylor Wires, MGW Shifter, Street slayer twin carbon clutch, Tick braided clutch line & speed bleeder, ZL1 Diff Swap, BMR Split drop, Sway Bars, Trailing Arms, Toe Rods, Pro bushing kit, Carslyle racing 15in conversion, Whipple, LPE dual fuel pumps, Rx catch can, Id1300x, Alky Control
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS - L99 - CGM Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 849
|
Okay, I may have spoken out of anger a bit there. The FAST is okay considering the mods that I have. BUT I have spent $950 on a IM that I won't see any real gains from until I do another 4-5K in modifications. The advertised the specs are :
Quote:
(RWHP) 25 -30 Vararam 16 FAST IM 32 ARH LT's, HF Cats and X-pipe Total 73 RWHP (conservative) My Mainline dyno initial dyno with bolts and no tune put down an average of about 295RWHP. With a tune I am now putting down 315RWHP So... where are these gains that I am supposed to see? I paid a lot of money to get parts and power. I expect it. I'm have a 2SS/RS L99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
CamaroFans.com
|
Old news... should have researched it first...
![]() It looks cool though |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS - L99 - CGM Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 849
|
Yeah I guess I'm going the N/A route to pull more power. I'm just very irritated because the numbers that these advertisers put out DO NOT match what we actually make. Now granted, its all an estimate but advertisers should put out REAL world numbers not "fluff"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
BAMF SS
|
That's one of the first lessons you will learn when getting into modding cars. MOST manufactors will exaggerate on their gains for a easy sales pitch.
Example: You are adding Billy Bob's CAI on your car Billy Bob says his Cold Air Intake will give your 36+ rwhp. You put said cold air intake on your stock motor and gain 16 rwhp I know what you are thinking... Billy Bob lied. Actually, no he didn't. Billy Bob was just vague. Bill Bob put compared his cold air intake with the stocker on a solid roller 454 lsx motor. A motor that would be REALLY choked by the stock intake, and would see very impressive gains to advertise. Billy Bob gained 36 rwhp on this motor. So remember, don't trust Billy Bob. screw billy bob.
__________________
2016 1SS A8: FBO + Circle D + P1X + Meth + Tuned by Pray Performance
Stock Longblock 800 SAE rwhp. 9.4 @ 145 mph. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Drives: My Two Feet Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 144
|
I agree you should more whp with your mods even without the fast. At least about 355+
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() Drives: 2010 Black Camaro SS 6 Speed Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 19
|
I agree. You need heads and cam to take advantage of that intake manifold. You can't add up bolt ons and expect it to work that way. You'd probably see a big increase with that intake manifold when combining it with some head work and cam
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
No way ur dynoing that low w those mods somethings up prob w the dyno
__________________
Loving this car!
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() |
those numbers just seem really low. lower than stock. san diego is near sea level isnt it?
__________________
brian
2010 camaro SS. LS3/6SPD (sold) 2003 Jeep Wrangler/Rubicon/NV3550 1989 F-150 4x4/300 I6/M5ODR2 1982 mustang. 351W/414stroker C4 9" rear. bracket racer 1977 F-100 5.9L 12V Cummins conversion/NV5600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| **K&N TYPHOON and AIRCHARGER Intake kits ~ 18+ HP! ~ Lowest Prices!** | Circuit Motorsports | V8 Bolt-Ons & Tunes | 81 | 05-24-2010 05:21 PM |
| FasterProms Ported FAST LS3 102mm Intake For Sale | Jason 98 TA | V8 - Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons, Tuning Equipment | 1 | 02-10-2010 09:56 AM |
| FS: FAST 102mm intake manifold - Never used | killer67 | V8 - Engine, Exhaust, Bolt-Ons, Tuning Equipment | 0 | 02-08-2010 02:59 AM |
| 3800 intake manifold | Gr8_syder | 4th Generation Camaros | 2 | 12-24-2009 09:32 AM |