Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-14-2009, 01:50 AM   #155
BeermanSS
 
BeermanSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2005 Cobalt SS/SC
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Wilson, NY
Posts: 214
yeah, I bet you could get over 400 hp out of a 5 litre DI V8. Lexus gets 416 out of their 5 litre in the ISF i think. Getting back to the 350 chevy would be cool 5.7 litre SIDI VVT with 450 hp and 450 ft-lbs and get 30 MPGs or so. That would be NICE
BeermanSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 01:52 AM   #156
Kyle2k
LVL 50 Troll Stomper
 
Kyle2k's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3 View Post
Yes, but engines can't keep getting bigger. I'd be fine if they dropped by 5-10%.
Oh for sure, I'd just like to see some DI LS3's or LS7's for that matter.
__________________
Kyle2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 11:23 AM   #157
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeermanSS View Post
yeah, I bet you could get over 400 hp out of a 5 litre DI V8. Lexus gets 416 out of their 5 litre in the ISF i think. Getting back to the 350 chevy would be cool 5.7 litre SIDI VVT with 450 hp and 450 ft-lbs and get 30 MPGs or so. That would be NICE
But that 5.0 only makes 350 ft lbs, which is a pretty big drop from the LS3. I agree with you on the 5.7/350 however ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle2k View Post
Oh for sure, I'd just like to see some DI LS3's or LS7's for that matter.
that would be pretty cool too. ~500 hp LS3 @ 26-27 mpg, ~600 hp LS7 @ 25 mpg. I'm not sure what would be better. A 30 mpg V8 or an insanely powerful one.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 11:29 AM   #158
edbrick
 
edbrick's Avatar
 
Drives: 2009 GXP -2007 MustangGT--Wife
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Florida Space Coast
Posts: 149
30 mpg's should be the sweet spot. You cant ask for better than that. After the first design of this engine series comes out i'm sure hp would increase from there as they improve the design.
edbrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 11:40 AM   #159
CamaroSpike23
Truth Enforcer
 
CamaroSpike23's Avatar
 
Drives: anything I can get my hands on
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: anywhere and everywhere
Posts: 22,797
Send a message via Yahoo to CamaroSpike23
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tal View Post
Wondering when we'll hear news about this again. GM is building quite a variety of direct injection engines with the four cylinder's updated via the 2.0T + 2.4 along with the V6's updated with 3.0 and 3.6 blocks. It seems to me that this is the time for some DI V8 lovin!
it is time.... for us. but they are probably trying to fine tune everything before throwing a DI v8 into a car (which takes time and testing before launch anyway)

Quote:
Originally Posted by phatman View Post
- Z28 -
There I said it ! I went there ! Got here - an nooooone else is here - but I don't care if I'm here all a-lone...
ur a day late and a dollar short.... I've been saying it for a while now. lol

Quote:
Originally Posted by edbrick View Post
I just wonder. At one time Fbodfather said something along the lines of forget what you know about currently available engines. I think new engines were put on hold but I wouldnt be surprised if in a year or two we get a new direct injected V8 and of course this would all be top secret because if it got out most would wait for the new engine. I might be dreaming but hey I can dream Right
that he did say.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle2k View Post
It would be nice- but I have a feeling a displacement drop would accompany the direct injection.
that was more towards what Fbod was getting at for future engines

Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3 View Post
But that 5.0 only makes 350 ft lbs, which is a pretty big drop from the LS3. I agree with you on the 5.7/350 however ...

werd. hp sells cars, torque wins races. some people only care about hp numbers but dont care that they arent getting those numbers till redline. its nice to rev, its nicer to move.

that would be pretty cool too. ~500 hp LS3 @ 26-27 mpg, ~600 hp LS7 @ 25 mpg. I'm not sure what would be better. A 30 mpg V8 or an insanely powerful one.
why not both? DI v8 pushing near 500 hp and 30+ mpg

Quote:
Originally Posted by edbrick View Post
30 mpg's should be the sweet spot. You cant ask for better than that. After the first design of this engine series comes out i'm sure hp would increase from there as they improve the design.
35 should be the sweet spot. no reason to barely bump the bar up, we should be achieving great power and great (not good) mpg.
__________________
Never race anything you can't afford to light on fire and push off a cliff
A group as a whole tends to be smarter than the smartest person in that group until one jackass convinces everyone otherwise.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BowtieGuy View Post
Nobody makes CamaroSpike happy. You just disgust him a little less than other people.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WheelmanSS View Post
Post count is truly an accurate measure of how cool someone is on the Internet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Norris View Post
I piss excellence
and fart awesomeness
"You can think I'm wrong, but that's no reason to quit thinking.”
Quote:
Originally Posted by Overflow View Post
But not all people were born awesome like you, Spike.
CamaroSpike23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 11:41 AM   #160
JJ#48Racing

 
Drives: 1998 Camaro SS
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lancaster, CA
Posts: 1,115
I think 30mpg is a stretch, especially while keeping the same power level. The 3.6 V6 isn't even quite there mpg wise.
JJ#48Racing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 11:54 AM   #161
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroSpike23 View Post
it is time.... for us. but they are probably trying to fine tune everything before throwing a DI v8 into a car (which takes time and testing before launch anyway)



ur a day late and a dollar short.... I've been saying it for a while now. lol



that he did say.


that was more towards what Fbod was getting at for future engines



why not both? DI v8 pushing near 500 hp and 30+ mpg


35 should be the sweet spot. no reason to barely bump the bar up, we should be achieving great power and great (not good) mpg.
Direct injection is good, but its not magic
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2009, 12:04 PM   #162
Kyle2k
LVL 50 Troll Stomper
 
Kyle2k's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 3,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3 View Post
Direct injection is good, but its not magic
Yeah it is, duh.

__________________
Kyle2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2009, 02:45 PM   #163
Tal
 
Drives: Old
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: OK
Posts: 726
Gotta agree, I'm looking forward to a DI V8 but if you are expecting more than an extra 1-2 mpg I think there's a very good chance you'll be disapointed.
Tal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2009, 02:56 PM   #164
edbrick
 
edbrick's Avatar
 
Drives: 2009 GXP -2007 MustangGT--Wife
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Florida Space Coast
Posts: 149
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tal View Post
Gotta agree, I'm looking forward to a DI V8 but if you are expecting more than an extra 1-2 mpg I think there's a very good chance you'll be disapointed.
One to two miles per gallon are not a big deal lets hope it comes with a significant hp increase like the article states. Cleaner emissions on start up was another plus but not a big one for me. So I guess the only real big upside would be more power. Okay Ill take it.
edbrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2009, 07:45 PM   #165
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Direct injection increases the efficiency of the process. This can be expressed in 2 ways: increasing power or increasing fuel economy. Its always a compromise, I'm sure the V6 could have been 30 mpg if they cut the power back a bit. I think GM will work towards improving fuel economy of the V8's more than power. In the grand scheme of things, 500 hp is getting excessive for low cost cars, particularly when fuel economy is becoming more and more important than raw power.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2009, 09:33 PM   #166
camaro5


 
camaro5's Avatar
 
Drives: X-15 Velocipede
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 4,630
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle2k View Post
Oh for sure, I'd just like to see some DI LS3's or LS7's for that matter.

GM has said the LS series engine is done.

The next V8, will start a new series, no doubt with DI.
__________________
Go from the presence of a foolish man, when thou perceivest not in him the lips of knowledge

General Motors ASEP, A.S. Automotive Technology, Telecommunications Specialist, CISCO Network Engineer

STANDARD DISCLAIMER
camaro5 is furnishing this information "as is". camaro5 does not provide any warranty of the information whatsoever,
whether express, implied, or statutory, including, but not limited to, any warranty of merchantability
or fitness for a particular purpose or any warranty that the contents of the information will be error-free.
camaro5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2009, 03:14 PM   #167
HotWire
 
Drives: 2008 Redline, 2004 Dale Jr MC
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: hawaii
Posts: 67
lol my redline with the 2.0 DI Turbo don’t get 30mpg. So where does a v8 fit in at over 30mpg? Not gonna happen for a while. Heck most the time if you get the auto camaro u will be cruising with only 4 cylinders... And well still not reaching 30mpg. The next generation of cars will of course be the DI route but with DI will come all the stinking nanny's that we currently have on the Kappa Platform. If they did do a v8 DI it will more than likely shrink in size to a much smaller v8... I’d say lower than 5.7 mark. But these engines can put nice HP out for their displacement. Of course mine is turbo'd but its over 300hp with only mod being turbo upgrade kit from gm.
HotWire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2009, 12:48 PM   #168
Tal
 
Drives: Old
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: OK
Posts: 726
Quote:
Originally Posted by edbrick View Post
One to two miles per gallon are not a big deal lets hope it comes with a significant hp increase like the article states. Cleaner emissions on start up was another plus but not a big one for me. So I guess the only real big upside would be more power. Okay Ill take it.
It's not revolutionary but it's good and may be more important than you expect when considering CAFE. Beyond pure mpg's DI will allow some high compression with regular octane though, which would save something like another mpg in costs (or more if your premium fuel is overpriced) even if it doesn't show on the sticker.

As for the Sky RL and Solstice GXP, GM could definately get them up to 30+ highway mpg's with a six speed and possibly a few other tweaks, but costs would increase a bit and a little performance might be sacrificed. It still shows that a DI V8 isn't a magic bullet for 30 highway, but I would have said the 3.6 V6 rated at 29 also showed that.

Last edited by Tal; 04-17-2009 at 01:05 PM.
Tal is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Camaro ls3 news...true or false? Dark Knight Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 74 06-05-2008 06:29 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.