Mustangs................

[fdjizm]

Originally Posted by 2SSARME

So, to sum it up. Stock for stock my camaro has more horsepower than your mustang. Is a lot better looking than your mustang. Is a lot more comfortable than your mustang. And pulls more g's than your mustang, unless you tweak it with a "track pack."

Got it. Thanks for clearing that up for me!

you forgot to put "IN YOUR OPINION" i am sure my ass is not shaped like your ass... and we don't have the same feel inside a car, unless that is.. if you can speak for everyone on the planet which would be quite the feat!

[a_Username]

Originally Posted by garagelogic

Nothing needs to be changed in the Mustangs suspension to accomodate the newfound power. Both the GT and the GT500 share the same suspension although spring rates and such are different between the two. if they need something stronger for the GT, they can just pull it from the shelf of parts already produced for the Shelby. It's not like they have to re-engineer anything.

Wow. I did not know the GT and GT500 share the same suspension. That's crazy!

[Jinx]

I could be wrong and the thing be the GT500's fat little brother. But I doubt, very much.

[fdjizm]

Originally Posted by rodimus prime

Id say about 30lbs for the 6speed alone. Add in the Brembos and if they offer 20" wheels and you hit that 150lbs fast.

Psst....

the new MT82 6 speed is 4 pounds lighter than the TR3650 5 speed. and 20" wheels as you said are OPTIONAL thanks for posting without research though

(shh i won't tell anyone that you posted without checking, let's keep that between us ok)

[colorado pony]

Originally Posted by 2SSARME

mustangs are ugly

this has been going on since the 1960"s..... the mustang in 1969 with the 390cu in against the camaro 396 cu in. ...o bye the way i was there... i am an old guy..... get something new besides the" mustang are ugly"
the 2005-2009 mustang looks much like the 1969 vehicles. i was unhappy with the looks of the new camaros ... if the chev had made the car body more like the older 1969 vehicle they would had a real winner....

[fdjizm]

Originally Posted by 2SSARME

I don't care. I'm not going to throw anything on to my car. I could care less. I know there will always be someone out there who will beat me...

bro as long as your turning heads that's all that matters LOL

[fdjizm]

Originally Posted by 2SSARME

Mustangs are ugly.

Stop living in the past. It's 2009, not 1969...

You know you're driving a "retro" styled car talking about living in the past right?

[a_Username]

Originally Posted by colorado pony

this has been going on since the 1960"s..... the mustang in 1969 with the 390cu in against the camaro 396 cu in. ...o bye the way i was there... i am an old guy..... get something new besides the" mustang are ugly"
the 2005-2009 mustang looks much like the 1969 vehicles. i was unhappy with the looks of the new camaros ... if the chev had made the car body more like the older 1969 vehicle they would had a real winner....

Obviously the majority did not want the completely retro look. Because if this was the case, then the Challenger would have sold 15,000 units a month compared to the Camaro's 4 and Mustangs 3. IMO if you want a retro car... Buy you a car from that time period.

[rodimus prime]

Originally Posted by fdjizm

Psst....

the new MT82 6 speed is 4 pounds lighter than the TR3650 5 speed. and 20" wheels as you said are OPTIONAL thanks for posting without research though

Wow 4lbs lighter? I was just guessing on them having 20"s. I dont even know if they will have them.

No need to attack. I was just saying, that weight adds up quick when you have big boy parts on your car. You think the Camaro is heavy because its made of lead? 6 airbags, 2012 saftey standards, 20" wheels, IRS, 14.4 in Brembos. Then add in any extra b.s. like speakers blutooth, leather ect ect ect.

I do like how you ignored the part about mustang gts stepping up to the 1993 z28 though.

[fdjizm]

Originally Posted by rodimus prime

Wow 4lbs lighter? I was just guessing on them having 20"s. I dont even know if they will have them.

No need to attack. I was just saying, that weight adds up quick when you have big boy parts on your car. You think the Camaro is heavy because its made of lead? 6 airbags, 2012 saftey standards, 20" wheels, IRS, 14.4 in Brembos. Then add in any extra b.s. like speakers blutooth, leather ect ect ect.

I do like how you ignored the part about mustang gts stepping up to the 1993 z28 though.

I don't have a 93 mustang, why would i be concerned? lol

ford SELLS CARS thats all that i care about with my stock holdings
I didn't attack you baby, you posted 30lbs more for the tranny before you even checked the specs. to me that denoted wishful thinking. a little research before you make a statement you think is right wouldn't hurt. feel me lil bro?

[a_Username]

Originally Posted by fdjizm

I don't have a 93 mustang, why would i be concerned? lol

ford SELLS CARS thats all that i care about with my stock holdings
I didn't attack you baby, you posted 30lbs more for the tranny before you even checked the specs. to me that denoted wishful thinking. a little research before you make a statement you think is right wouldn't hurt. feel me lil bro?

You must have been really disappointed when you saw the sales gap between the Camaro and Mustang for the past couple of months.

[BackinBlackSS/RS]

Originally Posted by fdjizm

there is no shortage of current 05-10 mustangs with 320 to the wheels that run 12-8-12.9 and better.

Okay. This has NOTHING to do with what I was referring too. In fact I was not quoting you at all.

[rodimus prime]

Originally Posted by fdjizm

I don't have a 93 mustang, why would i be concerned? lol

ford SELLS CARS thats all that i care about with my stock holdings
I didn't attack you baby, you posted 30lbs more for the tranny before you even checked the specs. to me that denoted wishful thinking. a little research before you make a statement you think is right wouldn't hurt. feel me lil bro?

Sorry I didnt get the exact trans they were using. Im sorry that it will weigh approximatley 26lbs more instead of 30.

I didnt realise it was that big of a deal to you.

[colorado pony]

Originally Posted by newagemuscle

Well, I like them both. I went with the Camaro this time around because I liked the looks better. I would definatly buy a stang again though. I know there are a lot of people on here that dog the stang, but in my opinion, we would not have the retro styled camaro we do today if ford did not take the bold step in the first place to bring back the retro styling on the mustang.

made the 2011 camaro front end look like a 1969 camaro... then you have a winner!!!!!