2011 Ford Mustang 5.0 V8 Engine Pics Leaked

[lil_chef]

Originally Posted by Super83Z

So post it. Gaining 50 hp from a 300 hp motor is nothing. Especially when the GM motor is gaining 50 RWHP on top of its 426 base hp.So in the end the GM motor is pushing 500 while you got you 350hp Ford motor. So now the 5.0 is pushed up to 412hp and that is alot of hp for 5.0L.

476 hp > 500 don't round up for one car then round down for another if you want to be taken seriously

[Super83Z]

Originally Posted by fdjizm

You are in for a surprise LOL

There are no surprises to be had. I have plenty of friends with real cars that do real mods at real dyno shops. So I couldn't care less about whatever proof you want to post. I know plenty about what the 4.6 does and 95% of it is with forced induction.

Matter of fact a good friend of mine owns a Ford only shop, and I always bring my Camaro's over on his dyno days. The only Fords that put down good numbers have blowers strapped to them in some form.

[Super83Z]

Originally Posted by lil_chef

476 hp > 500 don't round up for one car then round down for another if you want to be taken seriously

Reading comprehension > you

Read posts so you don't look like an ass.


I said 50 RWHP for the Camaro. 50 RWHP is greater than 50 flywheel hp. Which is also why I said "pushing 500".

[fazm]

Originally Posted by Super83Z

So post it. Gaining 50 hp from a 300 hp motor is nothing. Especially when the GM motor is gaining 50 RWHP on top of its 426 base hp.So in the end the GM motor is pushing 500 while you got you 350hp Ford motor. So now the 5.0 is pushed up to 412hp and that is alot of hp for 5.0L.

that is not a lot of hp from a 5.0

for the money maybe, but there are smaller n/a stock engines, making a lot more hp

[Super83Z]

Originally Posted by fazm

that is not a lot of hp from a 5.0

for the money maybe, but there are smaller n/a stock engines, making a lot more hp

We aren't talking about them, if they do exist.

[lil_chef]

Originally Posted by Super83Z

Reading comprehension > you

Read posts so you don't look like an ass.


I said 50 RWHP for the Camaro. 50 RWHP is greater than 50 flywheel hp. Which is also why I said "pushing 500".

Ugh thats what i get for watching football and trying to to be a smart ass at the same time epic fail

[fazm]

not IF.

ferrari 4.5 makes well over 500hp (562)

[Super83Z]

Originally Posted by lil_chef

Ugh thats what i get for watching football and trying to to be a smart ass at the same time epic fail

it happens to us all, sorry about my jerkness, my neighbor has me in a bad mood atm.

[toehead93]

Even though the 4.6L engine has less HP than a 6.2L V8 they both gain the same mod to mod. What I mean is you add typical bolt-ons to a 4.6L V8 and add the same bolt-ons to a 6.2L V8 and both will have the same percentage of gain. For example 25% RWHP will be made on both cars. So neither one is more effiicent, obvioulsy the 426hp car will gain more HP (426+25%=532HP vs. (350+25%=437HP). So don't expect the 5.0L V8 to all of the sudden respond poorly to mods because it its bigger and better.

On top of the new engine the Mustang is lighter and I don't see the weight changing too much, they just refreshed the car this year. Look, I don't like the looks of the new Mustang at all and they have always been a joke without seriuos mods or FI, but this 2011 Mustang is the real deal.

[Super83Z]

Originally Posted by fazm

not IF.

ferrari 4.5 makes well over 500hp (562)

What does this have to do with Ford's 5.0 again? See how off the charts you have to go to find a comparable engine? Its direct injected and costs a fortune. BTW that is alot of HP for a 4.5 liter, I forget are you proving my point or arguing it? 412 for a non-DI N/A motor is alot of factory power from 5.0l.

[Super83Z]

Originally Posted by toehead93

FYI- RWHP<FWHP
example: 426FWHP on LS3 SS has 375+/-RWHP on the dyno.
So, a 50FWHP gain makes less than 50RWHP on the dyno, not more.

Also, even though the 4.6L engine has less HP than a 6.2L V8 they both gain the same mod to mod. What I mean is you add typical bolt-ons to a 4.6L V8 and add the same bolt-ons to a 6.2L V8 and both will have the same percentage of gain. For example 25% RWHP will be made on both cars. So neither one is more effiicent, obvioulsy the 426hp car will gain more HP (426+25%=532HP vs. (350+25%=437HP). So don't expect the 5.0L V8 to all of the sudden respond poorly to mods because it its bigger and better.

On top of the new engine the Mustang is lighter and I don't see the weight changing too much, they just refreshed the car this year. Look, I don't like the looks of the new Mustang at all and they have always been a joke without seriuos mods or FI, but this 2011 Mustang is the real deal.

This guy isn't even trying to read the posts.

[fazm]

Originally Posted by Super83Z

What does this have to do with Ford's 5.0 again? See how off the charts you have to go to find a comparable engine? Its direct injected and costs a fortune. BTW that is alot of HP for a 4.5 liter, I forget are you proving my point or arguing it? 412 for a non-DI N/A motor is alot of factory power from 5.0l.

you said 412hp is a lot from a 5.0, not from FORDS 5.0.

and yes thats a lot of hp, and 412, is not. its a good amount, but not a lot.

[Super83Z]

Originally Posted by fazm

you said 412hp is a lot from a 5.0, not from FORDS 5.0.

and yes thats a lot of hp, and 412, is not. its a good amount, but not a lot.

Well I always forget about people that want to take things off topic. I figured since I was posting in a thread about the Mustang and the 5.0's return specifically, that it would all be understood. It must be my mistake.

[fazm]

Originally Posted by Super83Z

This guy isn't even trying to read the posts.

ill actually agree with you on this one