Fastlane Tune - Are these numbers good?

[mlee]

Numbers look good Russ... now we need to get back to the track where you already have a true baseline...

[Dangeruss]

Originally Posted by ADM PERFORMANCE

We just got almost the same exact numbers on monday from a customer with -Kooks 1 7/8,Magnaflow 16483,K/N Intake system(He brought his own parts we just installed and tuned it)

From what I recall his best was 356 rwtq and 362 rwtq sae corrected


Andy

Thanks Andy. My numbers were STD though, so that means they'd be even lower right?

BTW...love the ADM intake. I get compliments on it all the time.

[Dangeruss]

Originally Posted by mlee

Numbers look good Russ... now we need to get back to the track where you already have a true baseline...

I know...just put your headers on and let's go!

[wbt]

STD will read higher than SAE.

Every dyno is different BTW. I would take it to another dyno and compare the results.

[Big Turkey]

Originally Posted by brtaus

With all that and only 353? Some guys in the L99 dyno thread are getting 325-330 stock. So by adding all that you did, you only added 28-33 rwhp? Either I expect too much from those mods (as most people claim they get huge gains from those mods) or the dyno does seem conservative. Am I off base here?

Typical gains on any late model, NA car is going to be 5-10whp on an CAI and 15-20whp on a full exhaust system. Anything more is just outrageous since many of these new vehicles already come with very efficient intake systems "for what it has".

Now throw a cam in there and it's a completely different story.

On my LS3 I dyno'd 380hp stock, added a Vararam and full exhaust w/hi-flo cats and tune, it made 415. Now my stock dyno was on a 108deg day and it was so hot my iat's shot out the roof and the car pulled timing above 6000.. I think I might have hit 390. With that said I picked up 25-35rwhp. Exactly where it should be.

Then I threw in a cam and the car made 491whp.

The SAE and STD are just correction factors. I believe it does an multiplication based on a certain temperature so if you were to compare the charts to someone that dyno'd somewhere else, it would be *somewhat* comparable. But your air is different, the car responds different, etc which means regardless of the correction you still do not have an accurate comparison.

I dyno'd a L99 yesterday morning. This was at another performance shop in Houston. It made 326hp SAE and 351 uncorrected. Conditions were similar to what the OP posted. If you do want to try your luck at another dyno then I'll be more than happy to PM you some info with some around Houston.

[tp_preformance]

hello im new to the site and saw yall were talking about hp numbers on a header and exhaust swap. i have a speed shop and we also have a dynojet dyno. we have a 2010 camaro its a shop car. we did the header and exhaust and the cai. will post numbers when i get home 2nite what do yall think are those pretty good numbers? the 3'' exhaust we make in house full stainless system..

stock numbers
354.7hp-348.6hp

header and out custom 3'' exhaust
385.4hp-390.5tq

header and 3''exhaust and our mild tune
403.4hp-410.3tq

[NicKey]

A dynamometer is a measuring tool. You can't get a proper measure of the increased gains your modifications attained without a valid baseline.

There are a bunch of variables which may effect a dyno reading:

Some as simple and basic as tire pressure or even the quality of pump gas used.

Since you don't have a baseline, I would be less interested in your numbers vs other shops, but your numbers compared to other customers Camaros stock and then with the same mods.

[tp_preformance]

354.7hp-348.6hp these are the baseline numbers we did 3 back to back runs and this was the avg we got between the 3 numbers..

[tp_preformance]

here is my shop car project 2010 camaro and our results from it.

blue line is the base line we did 3 runs back to back and this is the avg number we got. its all bone stock..

red line is the header and our custom 3'' stainless exhaust that we make in house.

the green line is the headers and our exhaust and a mild tune.

[BLACK10]

Originally Posted by tp_preformance

here is my shop car project 2010 camaro and our results from it.

blue line is the base line we did 3 runs back to back and this is the avg number we got. its all bone stock..

red line is the header and our custom 3'' stainless exhaust that we make in house.

the green line is the headers and our exhaust and a mild tune.

is that car an L99 or LS3

[tp_preformance]

L99

[Roger Ramjet]

Originally Posted by Dangeruss

My dyno after the tune showed 353.41 max hp, and 365.71 max torque.

Here's the rest of the information.
Run Type: RO
Run Conditions: 52.90 F
30.07 in-Hg
Humidity 43%
STD: 0.98

Do these numbers seem low?

The STD correction factor of 0.98 says it all (2% less than measured HP).

Using the SAE method for the same weather conditions the Cf is 0.9477 (5% less than measured HP) which would make the numbers even lower.

[mr_desmo]

Originally Posted by tp_preformance

L99

i doubt that...6500rpm stock

[Roger Ramjet]

Originally Posted by tp_preformance

blue line is the base line we did 3 runs back to back and this is the avg number we got. its all bone stock..

L99 factory fuel cutoff is 6200 RPM.
LS3 factory fuel cutoff is 6600 RPM.