Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-25-2010, 12:47 PM   #15
purplhaizcraz3
 
Drives: 2010 2LT CHEVY CAMARO BABY!!!!
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Glencoe
Posts: 394
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNV View Post
I have an auto trans. So no shifting for me hehe. Just for kicks you should run your tank low and try running higher octane. Let us know if it changes.
Ah I see. I'm almost out of my current tank, so I think I'll fill her up all the way with 87, reset my fuel counter, and see what I get while driving very conservatively. Then I'll fill up entirely on 93, reset again and see if I get any changes. Will let you guys know what I find.
purplhaizcraz3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2010, 12:49 PM   #16
jleinaweaver
 
jleinaweaver's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LT RS
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Aloha, OR
Posts: 75
I think the fuse pull it to make the computer adjust immediately. I think it should change on its own after some time.

I see no difference with or without airaid. I get 16-17 with it, and 16-17 with the stock box (mostly urban driving). I've swapped back and forth after 1500 miles just to test, didn't see any mpg change.
__________________
jleinaweaver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2010, 01:50 PM   #17
spoone123
Next is SS camaro.....
 
spoone123's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro LS, Rally yellow
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NC, Goldsboro
Posts: 620
LOL 2.2 MPG what are you doing with your car man. Constantly flooring it? LOL
spoone123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2010, 02:58 PM   #18
SNV

 
SNV's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 RRM 2ls
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,307
Well as I said I just wanted to report my findings. I would like to know if others get the same results.
__________________
2010 IBM 1LT out. 2013 BRM 1LS in. It's like having a blank canvas once again. Modding has started! Now on to a 2014......
SNV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2010, 03:33 PM   #19
scrming
Red Brick of Vengeance!
 
scrming's Avatar
 
Drives: 12 Second Brick
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: at my pulpit
Posts: 7,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by spoone123 View Post
LOL 2.2 MPG what are you doing with your car man. Constantly flooring it? LOL
LOL!

That the "instant" MPG from the computer during a "spirited" take off...
scrming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2010, 05:13 PM   #20
mrray13


 
Drives: 2010 1LT RS Rally Yellow
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: southern Illinois
Posts: 2,973
Quote:
Originally Posted by dagolfguy View Post
I have also noticed an improvement in MPG when running premium fuel. I'm not ready to give stats on it yet, just a very unofficial "I think so".

Here's a question:
I've heard people say that you should perform a fuse pull when switching to premium so that the computer goes into learn more right away. I don't quite understand why that would matter and I'm wondering if anyone thinks that would be a good idea or not a good idea.
I made the switch to see if the knock retard would lessen, and then noticed the MPG difference in the DIC quite incidentally.
-Dave
Our cars won't benefit from a fuse pull, we only have one octane map. The SS guys get two maps, and if the car is set on the lower octane map, the fuse pull resets it, so when they dump in high octane, the car learns again.

In our case, just switch, the knock sensors will know the difference.
mrray13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2010, 07:39 PM   #21
faninc
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro RS in SIM
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 563
Get about same with and without airaid, perhaps a 1mpg loss...if any.
faninc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2010, 08:06 PM   #22
brian ludwig
 
brian ludwig's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2lt
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: new lersey
Posts: 29
airaid off

just to let you guys know i brought my car new in jan then it snowed the next day i did not drive it for 2 weeks. In the meantime i got a magnaflow cat back and airaid for the car it had 15 miles from the dealer to my house. I installed both and drove it till now. airaid off BIG BIG DIFFERNCE the car was better with it off!! went back to stock box after reading this forum and wow iam sooo happpy!!
brian ludwig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2010, 03:43 PM   #23
devildoc

 
devildoc's Avatar
 
Drives: '12 Toyota Tacoma Dbl
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Beaufort, SC
Posts: 1,275
It is so someones your personal results that drive a person to determine whether something works or not
__________________
STANDING 1/4MI: 13.948@99.87
6600RPM HP/TQ Gains - 30.54HP/24.3TQ (NOT PEAK)
devildoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2010, 11:03 AM   #24
Arthur 818
 
Arthur 818's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LT/Fully Loaded
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: California
Posts: 213
Send a message via AIM to Arthur 818
WTF ! people with the SS get better milege than me....i get around 13.1 with my 2LT..probobly to many hard take offs ??
__________________
Arthur 818 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2010, 10:17 PM   #25
Mombasa2k3
 
Mombasa2k3's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Red Jewel Tintcoat 1LT Camaro
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Omaha, Nebraska
Posts: 35
on my return trip this weekend i noticed 25.4 average MPG from Des Moines, Iowa to Omaha Nebraska it's about `160 miles with some small hills. Mines a M6 also the other day i gave her a bath and installed some AMSoil so... that could be part of it a new oil change but over the same distance last week i got maybe 23.6 or so same trip before oil change. Engine does feel smoother now with the full Synthetic though Edit: Forgot to mention that i reset the computer when i got onto the interstate cruising speed of 74. Also i run 89 octane usually cuz... it's a good bit cheaper here sometimes by 10 cents or more

Last edited by Mombasa2k3; 03-29-2010 at 10:22 PM. Reason: Forgot my cruising speed...
Mombasa2k3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2010, 11:27 PM   #26
sparaz
867-5309
 
Drives: 2010 CMG RS & 86 black Z28 3rd gen
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Redondo Beach, L.A. County, California
Posts: 295
of course 93 octane will give you better gas mileage, higher octane actually burns cleaner and slower in terms of the fume consumption with DI. As for the lower mileage with the LT than the SS, it's quite possible you have a LOT less hwy driving and much more city driving. Hills, traffic lights, stop signs, etc will always kill your gas mileage to the max.
sparaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 10:59 PM   #27
greenvillepilot
2fast4you
 
greenvillepilot's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro LS
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 181
I run 93 octane and I avg about 23mpg City and 26.4 highway. Once I learned of Sport mode many Des Moines Iowans have been getting left at the line : )
greenvillepilot is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Most traded and most bought with Clunkers Program lafountain General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 56 08-10-2009 09:27 AM
New CAFE Standards: 42 MPG Cars, 26 MPG Trucks by 2016 DMX General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 168 05-22-2009 12:07 PM
Let me get this straight....LS3 vs. L99 MPG JMAN311 Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 28 03-18-2009 06:27 PM
Ready or not: 36 MPG by 2015 mandate from Feds Scotsman 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 76 03-07-2009 04:19 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.