Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Vararam
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Tuning / Diagnostics -- engine and transmission


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-22-2010, 06:32 PM   #281
1fastdog
 
Drives: 2002 Z06
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Michigan/Florida
Posts: 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike@Diablosport View Post
Again, since GM cant see our tunes in the PCM, this is a moot point, unless you are using another tuner to flash your car.
I don't doubt you know your product as well as anyone. Whether it's a matter of puffery or stated as an absolute fact is something you might consider running by the corporate attorneys. { Not trying to be argumentative }

I couldn't tell you if a reflash by your company's system is detectable or not.

My purpose for posting was to point out my personal opinion that there is some irony I see when reading the Diablo Sport warranty. It seems to read to me that if someone changes your product from how you built it, there is no warranty. It also seems to read that any issues with the manufacturer's warranty of the vehicle your product might be installed in is at the customer's risk.

None of that is a bad thing to have in writing. The buyer is forewarned and the limitations spelled out clearly. I read the warranty on the Diablo site and I didn't see any ambiguity. Then again, I'm not an attorney.

I don't see any here not wanting folks to enjoy their ownership experience.
__________________
1fastdog
many Z/28's in my past

Last edited by 1fastdog; 04-22-2010 at 06:44 PM.
1fastdog is offline  
Old 04-22-2010, 07:14 PM   #282
themossman
Apprehensive Optimist
 
themossman's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 SS/RS SIM
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: JAX
Posts: 1,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by brtaus View Post
I know but I am not talking about the entire thread.

Here, let's recap:



The part bolded is what you bolded and are talking about in the underlined part. So, correct me if I am wrong, but you are saying they need to supply a warranty to the end user, so if the end users warranty is voided by GM b/c of their tune, then they will cover the repair... is that right?

The bolded part, which is what they said, has nothing to do with a warranty, either by GM or them. He is simply saying that if you use their product as directed, their product will not cause an issue with your car. Meaning, if you don't know what in the hell you are doing and you change parameters you know nothing about, then there will be issues with the car and you will have to take the car to the dealer for repair. But how is that their fault? They told you how to use it and if you don't know how to use some of the features, don't mess with them and if you mess with them and don't know what you are doing, they are not responsible.
Your taking that section out of context from the whole thread...which is why I said you had to go back further...it was like walking in on the middle of a conversation.


My point through the whole thread is that the tuner is saying 'hey, don't worry about the warranty...they can't see our tune' and that is NOT good advice. Even when using their product properly the tuner IS NOT agreeing to assume the liability of a voided warranty. The thread 'topic' was centered around whether or not a warranty would be voided due to a flash of the PCM...and think it's severely inappropriate for someone to say 'don't worry about it' unless they themselves are willing to accept that risk for their consumer. Potential liability aside...it's just not ethical IMO.

So...I'm not arguing whether or not the tuners product would or would not cause damage. My concern is solely on the risk associated with voiding a warranty and the consumer ACCURATELY understanding that risk. IF they are lead to believe that the tune is 'undetectable'...they could be in for a really, really nasty surprise if they have a warranty claim.

Has is been proven one way or the other? ..not yet. But again...there's a risk. And unless your willing to accept that risk, it's inappropriate to tell others not to worry about it.
__________________
Car is for sale --->http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=158486
Current Summary:
Engine:Phase One-(All work by Vengeance Racing): Custom Cam, AR Headers, ported throttle body, ported intake, custom tune, dual valve springs, hardened push rods, under drive pulley, thermostat, Vararam CAI, C5R timing chain, Melling oil pump catch can, breather, MagnaFlow Sport Axle Back
Suspension: Pfadt Sport Sway Bars, Pfadt drop springs
Other: MGW Shifter, Custom Paint
my build journal ---->http://camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=30057
themossman is offline  
Old 04-22-2010, 08:19 PM   #283
Bell040


 
Bell040's Avatar
 
Drives: 2SS/RS - Black - GFX
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: B'ham, Alabama
Posts: 2,458
where is that pic of the guy beating the dead horse ????
__________________
Ordered: 10-13-08
Built: 3-30-09 (#1691)
Recieved: 6-12-09

Blacked out, Cammed (Lunati Voodoo 233/245, .578/.598 @114°, +4°), ARH LTs, VR OTR CAI, Cutouts, and lots of other fun mods.
Bell040 is offline  
Old 04-22-2010, 09:17 PM   #284
SA CHEVY
"HILLARY"
 
SA CHEVY's Avatar
 
Drives: "HILLARY" :D
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 1,922
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bell040 View Post
where is that pic of the guy beating the dead horse ????
Even he died on like page 7 and bailed out...
__________________
2010 Camaro SS2 L99 Aircharger, Straightpiped, DT long tubes, Dyno tune by Cal Speed
384 HP & 392 Ft/Lbs. 13.203 @ 107.13 mph at Camaro5FestII
SA CHEVY is offline  
Old 04-22-2010, 11:17 PM   #285
jaymd17
 
Drives: 1SS
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: PHX
Posts: 23
I asked my service guy what I could add to my car and I was told I could use a tuner as long as it can go back to the stock config. I'm new to all of this but from what I've read and been told that as long as your tuner can put your stock tune back the previous installed tunes are untraceable.
jaymd17 is offline  
Old 04-22-2010, 11:44 PM   #286
HaveBlue
 
HaveBlue's Avatar
 
Drives: CTS/CAMARO
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SEMA/PERF INDUSTRY GUY
Posts: 488
It's been mentioned a couple of times here and it seems to get glossed over. Unless these tunes have an E.O. number they are a violation of the Federal Clean Air Act. They are illegal. If these tunes are so perfect why don't the manufacturers get EO's ? And don't tout Magnuson-Moss, MMA only applies to "like" replacement parts or certified "specialty parts", i.e. EO certification. It does not apply to ANY aftermarket part. (I've been in this industry for 30 years and was closely involved with the company and people who helped create the CARB-EO process).

So what I'm getting at is if your car is no longer a "street legal" vehicle, why would the warranty for a "stock-EPA legal" car apply? According to DialboSport and others disclaimers you now have an "off-road-racing use only vehicle.

Mike@DialboSport, show me you EO numbers. If your product is LEGAL put it in writing.

The EPA will come a knockin' sooner or later. They have done it before and will again. The internet actually makes it easier for them. Just spending an evening on forums would produce tons of leads for violations (starting at $10,000 & up). BTW, If your selling these services or parts, or making your own parts make sure you protect yourself with the proper disclaimers. You can contact SEMA for help with this. Also CARB can assert it's authority on any company selling there parts into CA, regardless of what state they are located in. They are going to business and asking for proof that those 200 parts you sold in CA, ARE actually being used on race cars, not street cars. Yes this is happening.

Is this the extreme scenario? Yep, but it is a Federal Law, regardless of local enforcement or inspections. As No3 said. It's about the consumer knowing the "FACTS" and making his own risk assessment.
I love cars, I love performance cars and have been very lucky to make my living in this industry. I have always and always will modify my cars. But I do so knowing and accepting the risks.
But what I don't like is people coming looking for information being misled. Lots of people make recommendations, but no one would be willing to back that recommendation if the recipient followed it and had an issue. Were will you be when the guy or gal has their car fail emissions testing or get their warranty voided because they were told that they should tear the exhaust off the car, put on Long Tubes and delete or relocate the cats and get a custom tune. Does that make great power? Yep. Is it legal? Nope. You cannot relocate the cats, period. Doesn't matter if there is no local inspection. Getting away with it, doesn't change the legality of it.
To sum it up, see my sig line.
__________________
"everyone wants to go to heaven. but nobody wants to die" "you gotta pay to play"

SEMA PICTURES-PARTS & CARS
http://www.pbase.com/haveblue/sema_2009
HaveBlue is offline  
Old 04-23-2010, 12:41 AM   #287
cplabaunza
 
cplabaunza's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 117
The disclaimer says for "off-road use"...ARB for the most part is a way for the state to generate revenue...if you install a part that reduces smog by 99% and does not have EO#, as good as it may be its illegal...


Quote:
Originally Posted by HaveBlue View Post
It's been mentioned a couple of times here and it seems to get glossed over. Unless these tunes have an E.O. number they are a violation of the Federal Clean Air Act. They are illegal. If these tunes are so perfect why don't the manufacturers get EO's ? And don't tout Magnuson-Moss, MMA only applies to "like" replacement parts or certified "specialty parts", i.e. EO certification. It does not apply to ANY aftermarket part. (I've been in this industry for 30 years and was closely involved with the company and people who helped create the CARB-EO process).

So what I'm getting at is if your car is no longer a "street legal" vehicle, why would the warranty for a "stock-EPA legal" car apply? According to DialboSport and others disclaimers you now have an "off-road-racing use only vehicle.

Mike@DialboSport, show me you EO numbers. If your product is LEGAL put it in writing.

The EPA will come a knockin' sooner or later. They have done it before and will again. The internet actually makes it easier for them. Just spending an evening on forums would produce tons of leads for violations (starting at $10,000 & up). BTW, If your selling these services or parts, or making your own parts make sure you protect yourself with the proper disclaimers. You can contact SEMA for help with this. Also CARB can assert it's authority on any company selling there parts into CA, regardless of what state they are located in. They are going to business and asking for proof that those 200 parts you sold in CA, ARE actually being used on race cars, not street cars. Yes this is happening.

Is this the extreme scenario? Yep, but it is a Federal Law, regardless of local enforcement or inspections. As No3 said. It's about the consumer knowing the "FACTS" and making his own risk assessment.
I love cars, I love performance cars and have been very lucky to make my living in this industry. I have always and always will modify my cars. But I do so knowing and accepting the risks.
But what I don't like is people coming looking for information being misled. Lots of people make recommendations, but no one would be willing to back that recommendation if the recipient followed it and had an issue. Were will you be when the guy or gal has their car fail emissions testing or get their warranty voided because they were told that they should tear the exhaust off the car, put on Long Tubes and delete or relocate the cats and get a custom tune. Does that make great power? Yep. Is it legal? Nope. You cannot relocate the cats, period. Doesn't matter if there is no local inspection. Getting away with it, doesn't change the legality of it.
To sum it up, see my sig line.
__________________
*Cyber Grey Metallic 2012 Chevrolet Volt
*Black 2010 Victory Cross Country
*Black 2008 Chevrolet Corvette 1LT/NPP/Z51/M6
*Black 2007 Dodge Charger SRT8
*Black 2005 Yamaha R6 (Raven color)
*Black 2010 Chevrolet Camaro 2SS/RS/M6 (SOLD)
*Black 2003 Dodge Neon SRT4 (SOLD)
*Inca Gold 2002 Chrysler Prowler(SOLD)
cplabaunza is offline  
Old 04-23-2010, 08:35 AM   #288
Mike@DS
 
Drives: 99 Z28
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SoFla
Posts: 230
Quote:
Originally Posted by HaveBlue View Post
It's been mentioned a couple of times here and it seems to get glossed over. Unless these tunes have an E.O. number they are a violation of the Federal Clean Air Act. They are illegal. If these tunes are so perfect why don't the manufacturers get EO's ? And don't tout Magnuson-Moss, MMA only applies to "like" replacement parts or certified "specialty parts", i.e. EO certification. It does not apply to ANY aftermarket part. (I've been in this industry for 30 years and was closely involved with the company and people who helped create the CARB-EO process).

So what I'm getting at is if your car is no longer a "street legal" vehicle, why would the warranty for a "stock-EPA legal" car apply? According to DialboSport and others disclaimers you now have an "off-road-racing use only vehicle.

Mike@DialboSport, show me you EO numbers. If your product is LEGAL put it in writing.

The EPA will come a knockin' sooner or later. They have done it before and will again. The internet actually makes it easier for them. Just spending an evening on forums would produce tons of leads for violations (starting at $10,000 & up). BTW, If your selling these services or parts, or making your own parts make sure you protect yourself with the proper disclaimers. You can contact SEMA for help with this. Also CARB can assert it's authority on any company selling there parts into CA, regardless of what state they are located in. They are going to business and asking for proof that those 200 parts you sold in CA, ARE actually being used on race cars, not street cars. Yes this is happening.
We have been very compliant with the epa. They know very well what we can do.

We used to allow customers to disable rear O2 codes, as well as disable EGR, and other emissions control devices through the handheld, but as pressure from the EPA came down to stop that, we respectfully agreed to do so. We refuse to offer DPF delete tunes for the diesel market, even if it is keeping us from being leaders in the late model diesel platforms, but we figure you're right, and the EPA is definitely going to start knocking on doors, but they're going to start with diesel first

EO numbers are not required to make a product legal, just for use in emissions controlled states, and EO testing is long and complicated, not to mention expensive. Those costs would have to be passed on to someone...



Quote:
Originally Posted by cplabaunza View Post
The disclaimer says for "off-road use"...ARB for the most part is a way for the state to generate revenue...if you install a part that reduces smog by 99% and does not have EO#, as good as it may be its illegal...
On the topic of EO#.....they are not as common as some may thing. There are certainly more speed parts without EO#'s that with...
Mike@DS is offline  
Old 04-23-2010, 10:13 AM   #289
HaveBlue
 
HaveBlue's Avatar
 
Drives: CTS/CAMARO
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SEMA/PERF INDUSTRY GUY
Posts: 488
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike@Diablosport View Post
EO numbers are not required to make a product legal, just for use in emissions controlled states,

Incorrect and a common misconception. Emissions laws (The Clean Air Act) are Federal. They apply in every state. What varies is the inspection/registration process. The EPA does mandate inspection based on population density and air quality. Example a state may only test in a Metro area, but not state wide in low density areas. The law still applies only enforcement varies. It's like speed limits. They are posted everywhere, but not every street is patrolled. Does that mean if you speed your not breaking the law in those areas? No, your just taking a calculated risk based on your knowledge of where patrols are common.
I'm sure you're a SEMA member. Download the SEMA Black Book and look it over...


On the topic of EO#.....they are not as common as some may thing. There are certainly more speed parts without EO#'s that with

Hypertech and Superchips and Edge have EO'#'s, they are not huge companies.

Here is a list;


http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/aftermk...es/amquery.php


.

There are really 4 separate questions here.

1. What's legal?

2. What can I get away with? (risk/reward assessment)

3. What will my dealership do? (as a customer service policy OUTSIDE of what GM's rules are)

4. How does this affect my GM warranty?

You really need the answers to all these questions to make an informed decision. THere is no Yes/No answer, with the exception if #1.
__________________
"everyone wants to go to heaven. but nobody wants to die" "you gotta pay to play"

SEMA PICTURES-PARTS & CARS
http://www.pbase.com/haveblue/sema_2009

Last edited by HaveBlue; 04-23-2010 at 10:40 AM.
HaveBlue is offline  
Old 04-23-2010, 10:20 AM   #290
HaveBlue
 
HaveBlue's Avatar
 
Drives: CTS/CAMARO
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SEMA/PERF INDUSTRY GUY
Posts: 488
Quote:
Originally Posted by cplabaunza View Post
The disclaimer says for "off-road use"...ARB for the most part is a way for the state to generate revenue...if you install a part that reduces smog by 99% and does not have EO#, as good as it may be its illegal...
Correct, except many disclaimers, especially for CA, now read "Sanctioned racing use only". Loopholes are being closed.

And yes the stupid part is you can lower emissions and still be illegal. But they don't have to make sense, it's a government bureaucracy. I know of one EO'd engine swap kit that had a non-functioning EGR valve on it, in order to pass the visual inspection. (this was quite a few years ago). This kit was sold by a OEM!
__________________
"everyone wants to go to heaven. but nobody wants to die" "you gotta pay to play"

SEMA PICTURES-PARTS & CARS
http://www.pbase.com/haveblue/sema_2009
HaveBlue is offline  
Old 04-23-2010, 11:56 AM   #291
Mike@DS
 
Drives: 99 Z28
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SoFla
Posts: 230
Quote:
Originally Posted by HaveBlue View Post
Hypertech and Superchips and Edge have EO'#'s, they are not huge companies.

Here is a list;


http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/aftermk...es/amquery.php
SC and Edge are owned by MSD, thats big time, corporate money....
Mike@DS is offline  
Old 04-23-2010, 12:40 PM   #292
HaveBlue
 
HaveBlue's Avatar
 
Drives: CTS/CAMARO
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: SEMA/PERF INDUSTRY GUY
Posts: 488
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike@Diablosport View Post
SC and Edge are owned by MSD, thats big time, corporate money....
Incorrect. MSD, Edge & SCP WERE owned by ValueAct, an investment company, uinder the umbrella of MSD Performance Group. MSD Igniton never had the money to buy those companies, it was venture capital.
As of last fall that is no longer the case. ValueAct sold them at a huge loss (after the market crash) and they are 3 seperate companies again, partially owned by management of each company.

Come On Mike, ya got to get caught up on industry stuff
__________________
"everyone wants to go to heaven. but nobody wants to die" "you gotta pay to play"

SEMA PICTURES-PARTS & CARS
http://www.pbase.com/haveblue/sema_2009
HaveBlue is offline  
Old 04-23-2010, 02:34 PM   #293
Mike@DS
 
Drives: 99 Z28
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: SoFla
Posts: 230
Quote:
Originally Posted by HaveBlue View Post
Incorrect. MSD, Edge & SCP WERE owned by ValueAct, an investment company, uinder the umbrella of MSD Performance Group. MSD Igniton never had the money to buy those companies, it was venture capital.
As of last fall that is no longer the case. ValueAct sold them at a huge loss (after the market crash) and they are 3 seperate companies again, partially owned by management of each company.

Come On Mike, ya got to get caught up on industry stuff
My bad for assuming their website was correct...seems odd to claim to be owned by someone, that does not actually own you??

https://www.superchips.com/#pn=compg&pid=28&psid=612
Mike@DS is offline  
Old 04-23-2010, 02:52 PM   #294
jrc1122

 
Drives: 2012 Mustang GT
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Abilene, TX
Posts: 1,358
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike@Diablosport View Post
My bad for assuming their website was correct...seems odd to claim to be owned by someone, that does not actually own you??

https://www.superchips.com/#pn=compg&pid=28&psid=612
winner !!
__________________
2012 Mustang GT Premium
Performance White
6-speed Manual
jrc1122 is offline  
 
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Your Warranty Rights The_Blur Camaro Issues / Problems | Warranty Discussions | TSB and Recalls 75 10-19-2012 08:24 PM
Laws Protecting Consumers for Aftermarket Parts strauchpete Audio, Video, Bluetooth, Navigation, Radar, Electronics Forum 9 01-17-2010 09:31 AM
not sure wht i want, please help streetsteve 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 11 11-30-2009 09:58 AM
IMPORTANT Part 1 Warranty Disputes Zeus Camaro Issues / Problems | Warranty Discussions | TSB and Recalls 11 08-25-2009 12:37 PM
Will the V6 have DBW or a good old fashioned cable throttle? theholycow Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 41 08-02-2009 09:25 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.