![]() |
|
|
#1499 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2005 STi corn fed Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,997
|
Quote:
Last edited by 8cd03gro; 10-03-2010 at 06:06 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1500 |
![]() Drives: SS Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 51
|
^
I think what he means if you had a ZL1 today you wouldn't want to race it, to valuable. Back in the day yes they raced the crap out of them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1501 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 A6 GT 5.0 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 2,909
|
Quote:
__________________
BLK/BLK 1SS/RS Ordered 11-01-2009 Took delivery 12-22-2009. Heads/cam/converter/bolt ons. SOLD Feb 2015 to fund 6th gen LT1 SS with 8L90E.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1502 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: bug Join Date: May 2009
Location: nv
Posts: 1,319
|
^ Yes dont they have a pure stock class at the Super Chevy Shows usually dominated by 427 cid's, Camaro's, Vette's, Caprice's and most are well into the 11's?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1503 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2005 STi corn fed Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,997
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1504 |
![]() |
I've seen forum members here use the "SAE certified HP rating" as an argument against HP claims by Ford and others. What does it mean and why is it important.
__________________
2013 Camaro ZL1, Crystal Red, Auto, Exposed Carbon Fiber, Navigation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1505 |
|
Full Throttle Only
Drives: '16 ZO6 C7.R & CTS-V & '12 ZR1 CE Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 17
|
SAE = Same As Everyone's. ;-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1506 |
|
Banned
Drives: 2011 Avenger Heat Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,697
|
FYI the ZL1( AKA COPO 9560) cost $7,269. The average house price was $15,500. The ZL1's were expensive and overpriced considering the car they were, but no where near the cost of a house.
ZL1=great, but not the mythical super legend that people make it out to be, Hemi's were just as fast. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1507 |
|
Okie doke
|
LOL .. no contest the stang would eat the SS for breakfast .. in the twisties and in the straights ..
Crowley
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#1508 |
![]() |
31 grand for a camaro SS 1SS...
Boss 302 Base price 36 grand... 5 grand difference before one option. 5.0 Ford Mustang equal in performance to the Camaro SS 1ss.. Boss 302 slightly faster than Camaro SS 1ss (boss 302 beats M3 which is cool) Z28 faster than the Boss 302 (and Ford shelby 500) JMO both great cars.
__________________
2008 Blk C6 Z51 NPP M6/2008 Silver CTS AWD FE2 304hp
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1509 |
![]() |
With the whole ZL1 vs Hemi/Mopar debate, i honestly believe the ZL1 was demolishing them. I love watching this series of videos online that sanctions heads up drag racing between stock muscle cars (restored or survivors) and ive seen a trend of Pontiac motors dominating, almost every time a Pontiac 400 will beat a 440 or Hemi and actually the 440s usually run a little faster than Hemis strangely enough the 455s dont run much faster than the 400s, but my point is if the Pontiac 400 is whipping 440s and 426s then the ZL1 427 would demolish them plain and simple. The Ponchos were running on street gas and the ZL1s required Sunoco, that alone says it all. And honestly nobody can say anything about SAE ratings because there's never been any true tests done to find out how much power those cars put out, i can gaurentee you it would be pretty rediculous, they were purpose built race motors.
But thats way off subject. This new Boss 302 looks bad as hell, and honestly if GM doesnt have a rival too it i might consider one myself. The Boss is pretty much exactly what i look for in a muscle car, its raw N/A performance in a stripped down package to keep prices low. A kind of "screw the Tom Tom i want horsepower" kinda thing which i think ALL modern muscle cars should be, i cant begin to tell you how pissed off i get when i hear people piss and moan about how the Camaro doesnt have on screen nav. SCREW ON SCREEN NAV! ITS A MUSCLE CAR! LEARN YOUR ROAD SIGNS! >={ Also there was a guy at the beginning of the thread that said "throw a little high spooling turbo on it" i think he totally lost base with what this Boss is supposed to be, it seems to me that one of its main focuses is the fact that its still an N/A car, its Ford saying "this is how far we can go before adding cop-out forced induction power grabber tactics" which in all honesty is what makes it the best balance of performance and streetability in my oppinion I just kinda wish GM hadnt jumped the gun on the Z/28 now haha, id more preffer to see the Z/28 compete with Ford's Boss 302s like they used too than see the Z dukin it out with the GT500. Im really hoping GM will announce a competitior to the Boss, i want a high performance, low luxury, no nonsense N/A Camaro thats basically tuned to say "FTW!" Which is almost word for word what the Boss is haha. Come on, SIDE PIPES!...SIDE...PIPES! Did we ever think we'd see THAT again on a production car with the government's rediculous strangle-hold on our automotive industry? Haha, its an amazing time indeed...Now we have a dilemma though, if the Z/28 goes for the Shelby and the SS is aimed at the GT what trim could possibly be used to compete with the Boss 302? Maybe a new 1LE option on SS models like they had in the 3rd gens?...hey actually now that i typed it and am thinking about it that sounds pretty perfect haha. |
|
|
|
|
|
#1510 | |
|
1 n the head,2 n da chest
Drives: 2002 cadillac deville Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: huntsville al.
Posts: 659
|
Quote:
http://www.e-rods.com/Engines/big_block_history.htm Like the L88, the ZL1 required 103 octane RON (minimum) fuel, which made both engines largely unsuitable for street use in an era where 102 octane RON (Sunoco 260) represented the highest octane gasoline sold at common retail stations. Impressive as the ZL1 was in its day and despite the "larger than life legends" surrounding it, actual engine dyno tests of a certified production line stock ZL1 revealed 376 SAE net HP, with output swelling to 524 Gross HP with the help of optimal carb. and ignition tuning, open long tube racing headers and with no power sapping engine accessories or air cleaner in place. ZL1 DYNO TEST - COPO CAMARO WEBSITE http://www.camaros.net/forums/showthread.php?t=55107 LikFactory dyno tests of the time showed that the ZL-1 engine produced 575 hp and 515 lb-ft of torque with open headers. take a BOSS429, Pontiac 421, Buick stage1 455, and 427 cammer, and dyno it in SAE gross configuration like the ZL1 dyno sessions you mention and you might be suprised.e the L88, the ZL1 required 103 octane RON (minimum) fuel, which mahttp://www.e-rods.com/Engide both engines largely unsuitable for street use in an era where 102 octane RON (Sunoco 260) represented the highest octane gasoline sold at common retail stations. Impressive as the ZL1 was in its day and despite the "larger than life legends" surrounding it, actual engine dyno tests of a certified production line stock ZL1 revealed 376 SAE net HP, with output swelling to 524 Gross HP with the help of optimal carb. and ignition tuning, open long tube racing headers and with no power sapping engine accessories or air cleaner in place. ZL1 DYNO TEST - COPO CAMARO WEBSITE Like the L88, the ZL1 required 103 octane RON (minimum) fuel, which made both engines largely unsuitable for street use in an era where 102 octane RON (Sunoco 260) represented the highest octane gasoline sold at common retail stations. Impressive as the ZL1 was in its day and despite the "larger than life legends" surrounding it, actual engine dyno tests of a certified production line stock ZL1 revealed 376 SAE net HP, with output swelling to 524 Gross HP with the help of optimal carb. and ignition tuning, open long tube racing headers and with no power sapping engine accessories or air cleaner in place. ZL1 DYNO TEST - COPO CAMARO WEBSITE
__________________
2011GT E85, Kooks 1-7/8", 3" offroad X, 2-7/8" overaxles, Roush mufflers, CobraJet intake, SCJ monoblade throttle body, drew 4.5" CAI, Boss302S exhaust valve springs, Baby CobraJet exhaust cams. 3.73 gears, lightweight 300A. 455rwhp @7800/410rwtq SAE 5000lb roller dynojet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1511 | |
|
1 n the head,2 n da chest
Drives: 2002 cadillac deville Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: huntsville al.
Posts: 659
|
Quote:
is that before or after the "red key"? cuz after the red key im sure the BOSS is even faster.
__________________
2011GT E85, Kooks 1-7/8", 3" offroad X, 2-7/8" overaxles, Roush mufflers, CobraJet intake, SCJ monoblade throttle body, drew 4.5" CAI, Boss302S exhaust valve springs, Baby CobraJet exhaust cams. 3.73 gears, lightweight 300A. 455rwhp @7800/410rwtq SAE 5000lb roller dynojet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#1512 |
|
eating 1 ricer @ a time
Drives: 1974 Z28, 2011 5.0 Join Date: May 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 91
|
the stock 5.0 beats the Camaro SS, not by much, but it still does. The Boss will rape the SS and the 5.0 GT as it has less weight, and more power, but I be non of us will see many boss cars around, so im not to worried...
__________________
[IMG]
[/IMG] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| camaro, camaro vs mustang, cobra, faster, mods, mustang, race |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Poll -- Camaro vs Mustang Supercar Shootout | JusticePete | Suspension / Brakes / Chassis | 105 | 10-09-2013 03:18 PM |
| Does the v6 have enough power? | cstproductions | Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 305 | 08-29-2012 10:27 PM |
| Winner, winner - Jalopnik compares the Big 3 | Number 3 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 31 | 04-17-2011 04:24 PM |
| Im sure this has been asked before.. But forgive my innocence :) | gmag21 | Suspension / Brakes / Chassis | 23 | 02-21-2010 11:29 PM |
| The DEFINITIVE EXPLANATION OF CAMARO SUSPENSION, ISSUES, AND UPGRADES | Info@PeddersUSA.com | Suspension / Brakes / Chassis | 106 | 10-19-2009 07:08 PM |