Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Vararam
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V8


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-30-2010, 09:21 AM   #15
Jchaluja

 
Jchaluja's Avatar
 
Drives: ZL1 Camaro
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 1,321
go TT
Jchaluja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2010, 09:54 AM   #16
2SSCAMARO

 
2SSCAMARO's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro Auto
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Fl
Posts: 1,164
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMRULZ View Post

If I read the thread correctly, the Whipple equipped car was completely stock with cast iron exhaust manifolds whereas the maggie equipped car was fitted with long tubes. If this were the case, it would not be a legitimate comparison. I have posted my real word iat's in the above post from logging on the street and the strip. I would like to see someone's southern florida street and strip logging iat's on their Whipple equipped L99 with long tubes for a better comparison.
2SSCAMARO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2010, 10:34 AM   #17
Beefman
 
Drives: 08 Landcruiser, 07 Denali,
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Corpus Christi, Texas
Posts: 54
I live in Corpus Christi which is nasty hot and humid. Routinely have mid 90's on temp with 65+% humidity for a combined heat index in the 105-115 range. No problems as a daily driver for the last 9 months since I had it done. I went with Hennessey 600 hp package and with their expertise can lead you down the right path to glory.
Call James, who is the sales manager for a great conversation.
Beefman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2010, 12:27 PM   #18
GMRULZ

 
GMRULZ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS & 2008 C6
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: VA
Posts: 1,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2SSCAMARO View Post
If I read the thread correctly, the Whipple equipped car was completely stock with cast iron exhaust manifolds whereas the maggie equipped car was fitted with long tubes. If this were the case, it would not be a legitimate comparison. I have posted my real word iat's in the above post from logging on the street and the strip. I would like to see someone's southern florida street and strip logging iat's on their Whipple equipped L99 with long tubes for a better comparison.
They added longtubes as well, the first pull was w/ stock exhuast. Everyone wanted stock numbers so they did that test forthe forum first. If your read the whole thread they added the longtubes, a cam and other parts, so if i were you I would contact T&T performance and ask them directly either by PM or phone. I dont see where they will be biased as they sell both maggies and whipples.
__________________
2010 SS L99, 536rwhp 10.843@126.72. Whipple Supercharger stock pulley, ARH 1 7/8 longtubes w/ catted xpipe, magnaflow 3" mufflers, ADM Race CAI, 3:70 gears, lightweight wheels and nitto drag radials. Stock internal L99, stock converter.

Bolt on best before blower 12.22@113.29 w/ nothing but ARH headers, catted x-pipe, ADM CAI and a tune on stock Pzero`s!

Other car 2008 C6 Ls3, z51, A6, Npp Exhaust, best bonestock pass 11.80@118.82, Number 2 on the Corvette Forums Bonestock fastest list..
GMRULZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2010, 12:59 PM   #19
Whipple Charged
 
Whipple Charged's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 143
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2SSCAMARO View Post
If I read the thread correctly, the Whipple equipped car was completely stock with cast iron exhaust manifolds whereas the maggie equipped car was fitted with long tubes. If this were the case, it would not be a legitimate comparison. I have posted my real word iat's in the above post from logging on the street and the strip. I would like to see someone's southern florida street and strip logging iat's on their Whipple equipped L99 with long tubes for a better comparison.
Long tubes will actually lower IAT as back pressure lowers, thus boost/manifold pressure. Furthermore, exhaust manifolds increase underhood temps.

Its pretty simple, the Whipple air-to-water intercooler is bigger and has far more surface area then any of the other positive displacement superchargers. Combine this with the increased efficiency levels of the twin-screw and you have very low air temps. You also have intercooled, bypass'd air where the maggie does not.
Whipple Charged is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2010, 01:15 PM   #20
old motorhead

 
Drives: Maggie blown LS3 vette
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SE TX
Posts: 1,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whipple Charged View Post
Long tubes will actually lower IAT as back pressure lowers, thus boost/manifold pressure. Furthermore, exhaust manifolds increase underhood temps.

Its pretty simple, the Whipple air-to-water intercooler is bigger and has far more surface area then any of the other positive displacement superchargers. Combine this with the increased efficiency levels of the twin-screw and you have very low air temps. You also have intercooled, bypass'd air where the maggie does not.
I've always thought LT's (uncoated) radiated more under hood heat than cast iron mani's. The cast iron mani's retained more of the heat and transfered it out the back through the exhaust. Isn't that why the turbo crowd likes cast iron vs tube headers? They retain more heat which is better for turbo performance? Have you guys done any testing that would refute that?

Not following you on your last sentence. Can you explain it a little better? Type slow so a slow mind can understand....
old motorhead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2010, 01:37 PM   #21
2SSCAMARO

 
2SSCAMARO's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro Auto
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Fl
Posts: 1,164
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whipple Charged View Post
Long tubes will actually lower IAT as back pressure lowers, thus boost/manifold pressure. Furthermore, exhaust manifolds increase underhood temps.

Its pretty simple, the Whipple air-to-water intercooler is bigger and has far more surface area then any of the other positive displacement superchargers. Combine this with the increased efficiency levels of the twin-screw and you have very low air temps. You also have intercooled, bypass'd air where the maggie does not.
I have never heard of anyone wrapping cast iron exhaust manifolds to reduce under-the-hood heat. It also has not been my experience of having cooler under-the- hood temps while running long tubes.
2SSCAMARO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2010, 02:13 PM   #22
2SSCAMARO

 
2SSCAMARO's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro Auto
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Fl
Posts: 1,164
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMRULZ View Post
They added longtubes as well, the first pull was w/ stock exhuast. Everyone wanted stock numbers so they did that test forthe forum first. If your read the whole thread they added the longtubes, a cam and other parts, so if i were you I would contact T&T performance and ask them directly either by PM or phone. I dont see where they will be biased as they sell both maggies and whipples.
The last post I see him talk about the iat's is post #433 and he is still running the stock manifolds. I don't see any more talk of iat's after that.
2SSCAMARO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2010, 03:28 PM   #23
GMRULZ

 
GMRULZ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS & 2008 C6
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: VA
Posts: 1,819
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2SSCAMARO View Post
The last post I see him talk about the iat's is post #433 and he is still running the stock manifolds. I don't see any more talk of iat's after that.
I beleive usmj`s post that i quoted a few posts up on this thread was asked after the final iteration of his build. I could be wrong, Idon`t have time to read through it again. However, like I said before if you really want to know you should really call Tim at T&T and ask him rather than asking me, or reading through 433 posts.. I mean he sells both maggies and whipples and he is about as unbiased as you can get.
__________________
2010 SS L99, 536rwhp 10.843@126.72. Whipple Supercharger stock pulley, ARH 1 7/8 longtubes w/ catted xpipe, magnaflow 3" mufflers, ADM Race CAI, 3:70 gears, lightweight wheels and nitto drag radials. Stock internal L99, stock converter.

Bolt on best before blower 12.22@113.29 w/ nothing but ARH headers, catted x-pipe, ADM CAI and a tune on stock Pzero`s!

Other car 2008 C6 Ls3, z51, A6, Npp Exhaust, best bonestock pass 11.80@118.82, Number 2 on the Corvette Forums Bonestock fastest list..
GMRULZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2010, 09:40 PM   #24
Whipple Charged
 
Whipple Charged's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 143
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2SSCAMARO View Post
I have never heard of anyone wrapping cast iron exhaust manifolds to reduce under-the-hood heat. It also has not been my experience of having cooler under-the- hood temps while running long tubes.
At idle, they put out more heat because of the thin wall tubing vs the bigger surface area, during driving, the air going through the engine bay does not really allow much underhood heat, especially in the front at the air intake system. But you do get lower IAT's because boost lowers as back pressure is minimizied.

The last sentence is simple, The Whip system has the bypass system below the intercooler, meaning this, when the motor has more than 2" of vacuum, its circulating intercooled air, not un-intercooled air. If you don't cool this air, the air temp rises during vacuum opertaion. This is more critical on screw compressors, but, is still important to the new roots type SC's, especially the TVS.
Whipple Charged is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2010, 12:45 AM   #25
VADER SS L99


 
VADER SS L99's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 A6 GT 5.0
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 2,909
On the debate of underhood temps with headers vs manifold. If your talking mild steel headers vs cast Iron Manifolds then yes, absolutly does the stock manifold keep heat down over the header but on stainless steel it will be a different story. Stainless Steel probably holds the heat in just as well as the stock cast iron manifold and a coated stainless steel header probably holds it in better. If I were not right then I see no way the new Ford Mustang or Toyota Tundra would get a shorty stainless steel header from the factory.
__________________
BLK/BLK 1SS/RS Ordered 11-01-2009 Took delivery 12-22-2009. Heads/cam/converter/bolt ons. SOLD Feb 2015 to fund 6th gen LT1 SS with 8L90E.
VADER SS L99 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Supercharger / Turbocharger Results (INFO) Thread radz28 Forced Induction - V8 273 08-15-2023 05:44 PM
V8 Camaro Performance Upgrades List Milk 1027 Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 93 08-30-2021 06:56 PM
Hot air Intakes -By Kenne bell ADM PERFORMANCE Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 66 02-08-2011 09:33 PM
List of Intakes that will work with the TVS-2300 MagnaCharger JJ2010 Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 26 03-19-2010 03:11 AM
5th Gen Camaro LS3 info from Chevy Hi-Po...READ TAG UR IT Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 295 03-07-2008 11:06 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.