Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
TireRack
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-22-2011, 03:21 PM   #351
zero
 
zero's Avatar
 
Drives: Black 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 265
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndeedSS1 View Post
I have both the VMax TB and VaraRam. Still have the dyno scheduled for 9:00 tomorrow morning. It has been illuded to that the Vmax and VR is a great combination and better than the 90 degree types, but I don't know that anyone has provided any hard data...yet. Tomorrow, I'm only swapping air intakes.

looking sooo forward to your results
zero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 03:31 PM   #352
AC
***GO HOGS GO***
 
AC's Avatar
 
Drives: 68/327 & 10 2SS SIM w/ CGM Stripes
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 1,796
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndeedSS1 View Post
I have both the VMax TB and VaraRam. Still have the dyno scheduled for 9:00 tomorrow morning. It has been illuded to that the Vmax and VR is a great combination and better than the 90 degree types, but I don't know that anyone has provided any hard data...yet. Tomorrow, I'm only swapping air intakes.
any news yet............................:emoticon7 :..................................ca nt wait.
__________________
ProCharger F1A, ID1000 Injectors, SW Headers, SW full 3" Exhaust, BMR Suspension, CCW 10"/11.5", DBA Rotors, 3.91's, 560/570 hp/tq


ProCharger F1A, VMax TB, ID1000 Injectors, SW Headers, SW full 3" Exhaust, BMR Suspension & 4 Point Strut Tower Brace, 3.91 Gears, DBA Rotors
Heritage Grille, CCW SP16a Wheels 10"/11.5" Nitto 275/40 315/35, Painted Calipers, Blackout: Bowtie, Rear Panel, Markers & Side Vents,
SS Fender Badges, 6.2L Cowl Lettering, Pistol Grip Shifter, RPI SS Door Kick Plates, Billet Cup Holder, Fesler Shift Boot, Lloyd Floor Mats..(1/4: 12.917 @ 109.63)
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 03:46 PM   #353
SGOS252382


 
SGOS252382's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
Quote:
Originally Posted by electlatino View Post
i like the look, and the reviews are great. but i have a question: it seems based on the position of the vararam, it would make a functioning ramair hood pointless as most of those hoods filter air to where a normal CAI would be placed. what do you guys think about this?

Most "ram air" hoods don't do much of anything.

The Vararam intake has no need for a ram air hood. Outside air flows though the front grill into the mouth of the intake. You can stick your hand through the front grill right into the month of the Vararam intake. It doesn't get any better than that.
SGOS252382 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 04:40 PM   #354
IndeedSS1


 
IndeedSS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS LS3
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Eastern MO
Posts: 3,786
Todays dyno results.

Guys, I've done this as above board as I possibly could. It cost me $200 for 6 pulls and me swapping out the intake at the half way point.

For the VR guys, the good news is I could hear the deeper sound with the VR. The other thing to note is despite the numbers, I can still feel the difference daily driving. I've left the stock airbox in, so I can drive it a few more days going back and forth to work to verfiy the differences detected. Anyway here goes.

Results are in:
I'll have to get the sheets scanned in so I can post them. BUT here are the average of three pulls per intake.

STOCK - 386.1-HP 387.2-TQ
VaraRam - 384.6-HP 388.8-TQ

The VaraRam was running pig rich. Despite being a no-tune unit Pauly said 400HP would be reasonable leaning out the fueling. VaraRam was 10 or richer. Stock airbox AFR ran a pretty solid 13.

I'm baffled by the results, as the feel certainly didn't follow the numbers. When you see the graphs you will see that tuning would be a good thing for maximum numbers. I'd love for one of you other non tuned limited mods VaraRam users to dyno. fwiw my only otehr mods are SOLO high flow cats and a VMax TB.

I looked at the graphs again and to be fair the VR stayed pretty consistant. After the stock airbox was put on the ECM didn't have time to relearn. It appears as the ECM began relearning the power and especially the torque went down on the stock setup. The graph shows the throttle response we all felt right at the beginning of the log. Look at the tq leap on the VR versus stock. Had my fueling been right the curve wouldn't have dipped.
__________________


She is only memory now.

Last edited by IndeedSS1; 01-25-2011 at 02:58 PM.
IndeedSS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 05:09 PM   #355
SGOS252382


 
SGOS252382's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndeedSS1 View Post
Guys, I've done this as above board as I possibly could. It cost me $200 for 6 pulls and me swapping out the intake at the half way point.

For the VR guys, the good news is I could hear the deeper sound with the VR. The other thing to note is despite the numbers, I can still feel the difference daily driving. I've left the stock airbox in, so I can drive it a few more days going back and forth to work to verfiy the differences detected. Anyway here goes.

Results are in:
I'll have to get the sheets scanned in so I can post them. BUT here are the average of three pulls per intake.

STOCK - 386.1-HP 387.2-TQ
VaraRam - 384.6-HP 388.8-TQ

The VaraRam was running pig rich. Despite being a no-tune unit Pauly said 400HP would be reasonable leaning out the fueling. VaraRam was 10 or richer. Stock airbox AFR ran a pretty solid 13.

I'm baffled by the results, as the feel certainly didn't follow the numbers. When you see the graphs you will see that tuning would be a good thing for maximum numbers. I'd love for one of you other non tuned limited mods VaraRam users to dyno. fwiw my only otehr mods are SOLO high flow cats and a VMax TB.

You definately need a tune. You're losing a ton of power being pig rich like that. I know Vararam says you have to drive around for a certain number of miles so the computer can adjust, but it definately seems as if you need a tune with your setup (ported TB, Vararam, high flow cats).
SGOS252382 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 05:41 PM   #356
ssmike
BL1ZZRD
 
ssmike's Avatar
 
Drives: '16 Camaro 2SS, '20 Equinox Redline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 7,841
I assume they had the hood closed with a 60mph fan blowing right? That's the only way the VR should be tested! I'm really not surprised because we all speculated that the VR won't perform well on a static dyno test because the true test is in motion. The SOP feel is probably more throttle response rather than HP or TQ gains. True test with OTR's is in 1/4 mile times, IMO! I have a Roto-Fab which lost 1 hp avg in Ted's testing but I know it's better than the stock by the way it performs so I wouldn't be discouraged! Thanks for doing the test and sharing it with us!
ssmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 05:43 PM   #357
axis
Search Ninja
 
axis's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central Ark
Posts: 7,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by SGOS252382 View Post
You definately need a tune. You're losing a ton of power being pig rich like that. I know Vararam says you have to drive around for a certain number of miles so the computer can adjust, but it definately seems as if you need a tune with your setup (ported TB, Vararam, high flow cats).
We're talking about NO TUNE versions only. Once you tune, you completely invalidate the comparisons. I too find it hard to believe that the VR didn't do better. Not sure why it's running so rich since he did the VR first. It was on the car for the last several weeks.

I'd like to see the numbers from the PCM if you have them. FT's would nice, to see what the PCM is seeing.
__________________
2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Halltech CF 102 fed
GPI modded intake manifold
Bo (knows) White ported TB
Kooks LT's/ Dynomax VT
Pfadted (springs/sways)
Dyno tuned by Rhino and GPI

I once parallel parked a train.
axis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 05:58 PM   #358
AC
***GO HOGS GO***
 
AC's Avatar
 
Drives: 68/327 & 10 2SS SIM w/ CGM Stripes
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 1,796
Wow didn't expect that. As mentioned above, did they have the fan blowing?
__________________
ProCharger F1A, ID1000 Injectors, SW Headers, SW full 3" Exhaust, BMR Suspension, CCW 10"/11.5", DBA Rotors, 3.91's, 560/570 hp/tq


ProCharger F1A, VMax TB, ID1000 Injectors, SW Headers, SW full 3" Exhaust, BMR Suspension & 4 Point Strut Tower Brace, 3.91 Gears, DBA Rotors
Heritage Grille, CCW SP16a Wheels 10"/11.5" Nitto 275/40 315/35, Painted Calipers, Blackout: Bowtie, Rear Panel, Markers & Side Vents,
SS Fender Badges, 6.2L Cowl Lettering, Pistol Grip Shifter, RPI SS Door Kick Plates, Billet Cup Holder, Fesler Shift Boot, Lloyd Floor Mats..(1/4: 12.917 @ 109.63)
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 06:33 PM   #359
SGOS252382


 
SGOS252382's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
Quote:
Originally Posted by axis View Post
We're talking about NO TUNE versions only. Once you tune, you completely invalidate the comparisons. I too find it hard to believe that the VR didn't do better. Not sure why it's running so rich since he did the VR first. It was on the car for the last several weeks.

I'd like to see the numbers from the PCM if you have them. FT's would nice, to see what the PCM is seeing.

Yes, but there something very wrong with his tuning. His combination of mods along with the stock tuning isn't working right.

The no tune Vararam might not work well with a Ported TB and high flow cats without tuning?

But one things for sure, if he wants his power back (plus some more) he needs to get his car tuned.
SGOS252382 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 06:39 PM   #360
zero
 
zero's Avatar
 
Drives: Black 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 265
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndeedSS1 View Post
Guys, I've done this as above board as I possibly could. It cost me $200 for 6 pulls and me swapping out the intake at the half way point.

For the VR guys, the good news is I could hear the deeper sound with the VR. The other thing to note is despite the numbers, I can still feel the difference daily driving. I've left the stock airbox in, so I can drive it a few more days going back and forth to work to verfiy the differences detected. Anyway here goes.

Results are in:
I'll have to get the sheets scanned in so I can post them. BUT here are the average of three pulls per intake.

STOCK - 386.1-HP 387.2-TQ
VaraRam - 384.6-HP 388.8-TQ

The VaraRam was running pig rich. Despite being a no-tune unit Pauly said 400HP would be reasonable leaning out the fueling. VaraRam was 10 or richer. Stock airbox AFR ran a pretty solid 13.

I'm baffled by the results, as the feel certainly didn't follow the numbers. When you see the graphs you will see that tuning would be a good thing for maximum numbers. I'd love for one of you other non tuned limited mods VaraRam users to dyno. fwiw my only otehr mods are SOLO high flow cats and a VMax TB.


I guess the butt dyno will always feels different than the real deal. I don`t want to tune and I`m sure alot of others feel the same way. Thank you for doing the runs at the dyno with vararam and back to stock. You have helped my decision.
zero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 07:03 PM   #361
IndeedSS1


 
IndeedSS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS LS3
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Eastern MO
Posts: 3,786
Quote:
Originally Posted by zero View Post
I guess the butt dyno will always feels different than the real deal. I don`t want to tune and I`m sure alot of others feel the same way. Thank you for doing the runs at the dyno with vararam and back to stock. You have helped my decision.
You are welcome, I wanted to be completely honest no matter the results. I just got back from driving aournd the wife around a couple places and can say I'm 100% sure the car feels down on power compared to having the VaraRam on there. I do realize this numbers are peak and not what we do during normal driving. I too am confused about all of this.

Axis - There isn't any PCM info. I never got around to scanning with my SCT to look at trims. I was assuming they were good based on BackinBlackSS/RS findings. Once the VR goes back on, I'll do some scanning.

Having scanner problems so getting the graphs posted is turning out to be a PITA.
__________________


She is only memory now.
IndeedSS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 07:11 PM   #362
IndeedSS1


 
IndeedSS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS LS3
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Eastern MO
Posts: 3,786
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssmike View Post
I assume they had the hood closed with a 60mph fan blowing right? That's the only way the VR should be tested! I'm really not surprised because we all speculated that the VR won't perform well on a static dyno test because the true test is in motion. The SOP feel is probably more throttle response rather than HP or TQ gains. True test with OTR's is in 1/4 mile times, IMO! I have a Roto-Fab which lost 1 hp avg in Ted's testing but I know it's better than the stock by the way it performs so I wouldn't be discouraged! Thanks for doing the test and sharing it with us!
Mike I agee with you. And thanls, not sure it the information was useful to anyone or not though.

To adress some of the other questions.

Yes there was a fan tilted toward the grille area. I don't think the fan is a large one like Ted's. I believe the tuner shop said something about 40 mph.

The tune has not been touched. Completely stock and the fueling fell right back into line as soon as the stock box was put on.

Seems to me that thins intake indeed need a tune to show good numbers, but I still love it for my daily trips.

I've probably driven with the VaraRam on for well over 1200 miles, maybe over 2000 miles.
__________________


She is only memory now.
IndeedSS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 07:12 PM   #363
Ohten

 
Ohten's Avatar
 
Drives: Granite Crystal Challenger SRT
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: West Palm Beach,FL by way of Akron,OH
Posts: 1,406
Okay,so who has had their car tuned with the Vararam installed and we want numbers.
__________________
Ohten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2011, 07:17 PM   #364
zero
 
zero's Avatar
 
Drives: Black 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 265
I`m pretty sure once you tune... most intakes make close to the same hp regardless of which one you choose...thats why people are so consumed by dyno and independant runs for no tune intakes.
zero is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Camaro Dove Tail Spoilers Compilation daphatgrant Cosmetics and Lighting Modification Discussions 473 07-11-2025 10:07 PM
Racing Brake 2 pc Rotors Installed mtcwby Suspension / Brakes / Chassis 36 11-13-2010 06:07 PM
Got A Vararam for $10! (Warning long read) shadow09 Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 11 04-26-2010 11:44 PM
Check Engine light on after ARH and Pipeline CAI installed se7en Tuning / Diagnostics -- engine and transmission 17 03-10-2010 09:06 AM
Another Dealer Installed Stripe Problem 69er Camaro Issues / Problems | Warranty Discussions | TSB and Recalls 7 07-13-2009 04:32 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.