Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
TireRack
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-21-2009, 11:22 AM   #1
eggydoo
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 629
Base Interior - My thoughts

Got a chance to look at the base interior (cloth) in person at the Dallas auto show.

I'm pretty picky when it comes to interior so take this as a grain of salt.
Personally I think it feels cheap, and the area where the gauges would go just looks so empty. It doesn't have the same class as the 2LT or 2SS interiors.
The trim looks pretty bare and boring. It just does not feel like a "21st century" type car. The main thing that really bugged me is the shift knob.

I just wanted to get my thoughts out there for anyone that has not been able to see it in person yet and is on the fence between going leather or cloth.
The small things just make the interior look way different.
eggydoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2009, 11:32 AM   #2
hdhomer
 
hdhomer's Avatar
 
Drives: 69 Cutlass - small block
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 65
The first time I felt the shift knob iin the 1LT it bugged me as well. But days later I checked it out again and is fine. It felt a little rough to the touch the first time. I guess a little wear softened it up.
hdhomer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2009, 11:49 AM   #3
Number 3
Hail to the King baby!
 
Number 3's Avatar
 
Drives: '19 XT4 2.0T & '22 VW Atlas 2.0T
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Illinois
Posts: 12,306
Quote:
Originally Posted by eggydoo View Post
Got a chance to look at the base interior (cloth) in person at the Dallas auto show.

I'm pretty picky when it comes to interior so take this as a grain of salt.
Personally I think it feels cheap, and the area where the gauges would go just looks so empty. It doesn't have the same class as the 2LT or 2SS interiors.
The trim looks pretty bare and boring. It just does not feel like a "21st century" type car. The main thing that really bugged me is the shift knob.

I just wanted to get my thoughts out there for anyone that has not been able to see it in person yet and is on the fence between going leather or cloth.
The small things just make the interior look way different.

Keep in mind, it wasn't really meant to look like a 21st century car. There are a lot retro cues. And for usability, I do like not having the quad gage package in Number 3. Good storage, place to keep your phone or ipod handy. But the gage pack does make it look more finished, though.

And for not being skin over foam on the I/P, this is reasonably good material. It just isn't "soft" to the touch like you would find in other cars. There are only 3 main differences in the new Mustang interior. 1) skin over foam top pad - the rest of the interior including the doors is plastic. 2) metal plate across the I/P (better if you like that sort of thing) and 3) NAV as an option. But Nav caries very littel value for resale and residual. GM at least acknowledges here that most people would rather buy a $400 Garmin than pay $2,000 for a NAV radio that you can't take with you.

Number 3 is a 1LT. Getting the leather wheel and shift knob with the connectivity package makes a HUGE difference. But you should feel like the 2LS and 2SS are more upscale, that's what you are paying for.

I agree, the I/P is a bit plain, particularly in front of the passenger. That is where the metal on the Mustang may be giving you a feeling of being better.
__________________
"Speed, it seems to me, provides the one genuinely modern pleasure." - Aldous Huxley
Number 3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2009, 11:53 AM   #4
Crowley
Okie doke
 
Crowley's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 GT500
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: McKinney Texas
Posts: 3,567
The only reason I lol at your first line is .. from the folding brochure they sent out. " Open the doors to behold an ICONIC INTERIOR for the 21st century"

lol

Crowley

Quote:
Originally Posted by Number 3 View Post
Keep in mind, it wasn't really meant to look like a 21st century car. There are a lot retro cues. And for usability, I do like not having the quad gage package in Number 3. Good storage, place to keep your phone or ipod handy. But the gage pack does make it look more finished, though.

And for not being skin over foam on the I/P, this is reasonably good material. It just isn't "soft" to the touch like you would find in other cars. There are only 3 main differences in the new Mustang interior. 1) skin over foam top pad - the rest of the interior including the doors is plastic. 2) metal plate across the I/P (better if you like that sort of thing) and 3) NAV as an option. But Nav caries very littel value for resale and residual. GM at least acknowledges here that most people would rather buy a $400 Garmin than pay $2,000 for a NAV radio that you can't take with you.

Number 3 is a 1LT. Getting the leather wheel and shift knob with the connectivity package makes a HUGE difference. But you should feel like the 2LS and 2SS are more upscale, that's what you are paying for.

I agree, the I/P is a bit plain, particularly in front of the passenger. That is where the metal on the Mustang may be giving you a feeling of being better.
__________________
Crowley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2009, 01:44 PM   #5
TJ91
:chevy:
 
TJ91's Avatar
 
Drives: 2LT/RS
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 13,035
I think tha ABL will help out the passenger side. When i sat in the IOM 2SS/RS with the IOM trim package, it felt amazing. Everything felt really nice. Everything felt real luxurious and expensive. And ths was with the cloth panels instead of the plastc. I think, hen you pay to go for the 2LT or 2SS, you will definitly feal a big difference in your overall impression of the car compared to a an LT, LS , or basic 1SS.
I told my brother that i wouldnt let him drive it for a year because thats what he did to me when he bought his new Mustang and he said "I dont want to drive it" and about a year ago he said that because he didnt like the Camaro much but this time he went on to say " The car is to nice, and it looks so expensive, the paint is soo nice and the two-tone leather looks sick"
COming from him, i was even shocked, up until the autoshow, he was certain that he wouldnt care for the Camaro, but after seeing the Camaro, he was even dissing the new Mustang.
I dont think he got the same feeling with the LT ther, and neither did i. We loved both the LT and 2SS from a exterior appearence, but the SS having being fully loaded, made a huge difference in the overall feeling you get from the car. The LT is definitly a nice car, but i personally would not opt for the grey, only black if i was getting cloth.
TJ91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2009, 08:37 PM   #6
stovt001


 
stovt001's Avatar
 
Drives: 2006 Cobalt, 2004 Taurus wagon
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 3,810
It bothers me hearing the plastic isn't soft touch. That really cuts down on squeaks and rattles, and just gives a higher quality feel. Lame.
__________________
"It's kind of fun to do the impossible" - Walt Disney

There's a great big beautiful tomorrow
shining at the end of every day
There's a great big beautiful tomorrow
Just a dream away
stovt001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2009, 09:01 PM   #7
UCF w00t
Geek
 
UCF w00t's Avatar
 
Drives: IOM 2010 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Orlando
Posts: 4,451
Most of the plastics are soft touch. But then again that was in the 2LT. I thought it all looked and felt very high quality. My problem was with the cloth in the door panels and dash insert. But those should be changing for the 2LT and 2SS. But even still, that's just swaping in cloth so it's still all soft touch.
UCF w00t is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
base camaro beats out 2010 mustang in pricing war? bolteon593 Camaro Price | Ordering | Tracking | Dealers Discussions 13 11-19-2008 10:30 AM
FULL CAMARO PRICING: LS = $22,995 (base) / SS = $30,995 (base) (MSRP) ChevyMR Camaro Price | Ordering | Tracking | Dealers Discussions 729 10-14-2008 08:55 PM
Pricing info tonight 10/13 12:00am DrewsZ Camaro Price | Ordering | Tracking | Dealers Discussions 201 10-12-2008 11:32 PM
GM Attempting to keep Camaro Buzz alive for 2 years rray200 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 32 02-01-2007 05:44 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.