![]() |
|
|
#11719 | ||
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
)
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#11720 |
![]() Drives: 2022 Camaro LT1 Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: new brunswick
Posts: 328
|
went for a ride in a 5.0L today...
and although they aren't great to look at it went like it was on fire. Night and day difference in his car versus mine. His ran 12.9 stock at the track and he has some bolt on's and tune on the way. My buddy that was with him is looking for a Boss 302 right now so I guess I have my work cut out for me. On a side note a stock auto SS with 150 shot runs 11.96 in the 1/4. Car had 6000 kilometers on it.
__________________
2024 Shark Skin Metallic LT1 On order
2022 Equinox LT |
|
|
|
|
|
#11721 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: GM products Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 1,621
|
Mod's make the difference. Stock for stock that 5.0 wouldn't be anything that special, modded to modded probably the same.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11722 |
|
Caffeine Injected
Drives: 13 Ram - 05 Widebody 1050rwhp Vette Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Woodstock, Ga
Posts: 1,033
|
I keep hearing that the auto 5.0s are faster than the sticks, idk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11723 |
|
Waiting to Drive
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2SS/RS IBM w/SIM Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Germantown, TN
Posts: 164
|
Speaking of the 5.0 mustang, I still can't believe Ford is dropping in Chinese made transmissions!
__________________
2011 Camaro 2ss/rs IBM 6M with SIM stripes
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#11724 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS RJT, 6speed Join Date: May 2011
Location: South Florida
Posts: 887
|
To me, the 5.0 is a second late and a liter short....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11725 |
![]() Drives: 2022 Camaro LT1 Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: new brunswick
Posts: 328
|
Auto is faster than stick buddy told me. That transmission shifts really good and almost launches like it had a converter.
__________________
2024 Shark Skin Metallic LT1 On order
2022 Equinox LT |
|
|
|
|
|
#11726 |
![]() Drives: 2012 Camaro LSX 2LT RS Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Memphis, Tennessee
Posts: 398
|
For those who have driven the 5.0.....
is it noticably faster than the SS? I mean going by the butt dyno? I love camaros but have to consider all my options first.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11727 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 2SS/RS Join Date: May 2011
Location: Boston
Posts: 967
|
Make sure you ask this on a Mustang website as well about the Camaro SS.
As for your question, I could not tell you, sorry.
__________________
My Cockiness is YOU falling short of Confidence |
|
|
|
|
|
#11728 |
![]() Drives: 2011 2SS M6 Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tx
Posts: 53
|
I don't think they are any faster. At the track the last few weeks the stock ones run about the same times as the SS. They might feel a little quicker because of the weight difference. My friend said his 5.0 came with 3.73 gears so that will help with the feel faster to. The 5.0's I saw were running 13.50's to 13.90's with out a hard launch
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11729 |
![]() Drives: '71 Buick GSX- '12 2LT/RS-Silverado Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: KY-USA
Posts: 56
|
Maybe a tenth or two quicker due to the weight difference assuming the drivers are equally skilled. No more than that. Mustang guys are almost always going to
say one thing and Camaro guys are going to say the other on their specific web forums. The reality is when power is equal the one with the less weight will have the advantage. Now thats all out the window when you add modifications, driver skill, and luck into the mix. Both are beast and represent their camp well.....it boils down to which one you want to own. Since Ford made the rear of the Mustang hideous to look at I would prefer a Camaro 1SS dressed in Black if I was choosing between the two. Last edited by carguyusa; 07-03-2011 at 09:04 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11730 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2015 c7 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 7,462
|
my friend will agree with what i am about to say. my LS3 engine feels better to drive, but we both like the feel of his transmission better. both cars are manuals. we both have mods done at different times, tunes headers CAI etc we never once had both cars stock to get a comparison so i really dont know.
also from the mods we have done, i have more HP, buy his engine responded better to mods than my LS3 did. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11731 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: racecars Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: BMN
Posts: 1,776
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11732 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '15 SS 1LE, '69 Z28 drag car Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Mich
Posts: 4,482
|
Biggest difference I noticed is the 5.0 comes on very strong in the higher RPMs, but down low it is nothing special. Where as the SS 6.2L has strong torque all the way from just off idle. First time I stepped on a 5.0, I thought - is that all there is, pretty weak. Then I realized you had to really hold it floored and when the rpms build - then the power comes on real strong.
Give me a large cube pushrod V8 any day over a high revving overhead cam motor. I don't care which one does the 1/4 quicker, having more torque down low makes every drive more exciting - not just when you hold it floored to 7000 rpm. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Camaro VS Mustang Mega Thread | Beau Tie | Chevy Camaro vs... | 3644 | 03-09-2012 08:45 PM |
| Gran Turismo 5... No Camaro? | 5thGenOwner | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 111 | 12-06-2011 11:06 AM |
| Official 2011 Mustang GT info released | nester7929 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 81 | 12-28-2009 04:13 PM |