![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Do you want to see an automatic option for the ZL1? | |||
| Yes |
|
1,312 | 66.30% |
| No |
|
667 | 33.70% |
| Voters: 1979. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#421 |
|
R6P Marketing Lab Rat
Drives: sometimes Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 339
|
My BIG decision maker for my Camaro 2SS RS purchase was the option for an automatic. I too have a physical disability as do some others on here.
I have watched all of the late model SVO, SVT, Shelby and special edition Mustangs come and go, most of which if not all have been manual transmission equipped. Just look at the market segment numbers for the SS automatic equipped cars and it is easy to see the potential to get more market share that has been ignored for an extremely long time now. But they went ahead to compete directly with the GT500 and pulled out the same page for market segment strategy that Ford used. Again, leaving out and ignoring the potential for sales growth of the automatic transmission consumer. It is just so frustrating to see this happen over and over again only to be denied each time. I would have been a buyer had they made a SOLID announced commitment with the automatic as an option. I have waited long enough. My $$ is going some place else instead. |
|
|
|
|
|
#422 | |
![]() Drives: N/A Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: N/A
Posts: 105
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#423 |
![]() Drives: 14 SS Sedan Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 474
|
Well if they are putting an automatic in the ZL1, then they better put one in the Z06 and ZR1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#424 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Plus I can see a DCT in the future for the Z06/ZR1; Ferrari and Porsche already have a few vehicles with it! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#425 |
|
A GM nut-swinger!
Drives: A Car Join Date: May 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 262
|
I'm not a big fan of autos but I still voted to see it as an option. Why not?
__________________
2004 GTO Quicksilver
2009 G8 Liquid Red 2005 CTS-V Black Raven |
|
|
|
|
|
#426 |
![]() Drives: -_- !!! Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#427 | |
![]() Drives: 04 Denali Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: stockton ca
Posts: 390
|
Quote:
That's what I'm talking about. Doesnt mater if you want a manual or an auto. You Could still vote yes. The more sales the better GM does. Its a win-win situation.
__________________
![]() But Officer, I swear its just a vacuum leak. Those red things? those are smog pumps! 2004 Sierra Denali ----- 2/4 drop LSX 438 TWIN TURBO LSX Block Video Block number 00370. Build Date 04/17/2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#428 |
![]() Drives: -_- !!! Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#429 |
![]() Drives: 2011 Black RS SS Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 137
|
Looks like I am in the minority here, but only making a manual transmission was one of my very favorite features of this car. This is a drivers car! Those with money to burn can still buy the car and have a shop shoehorn an auto in it so they can drive like (insert your own analogy here).
I voted to leave it as GM intended. |
|
|
|
|
|
#430 |
![]() Drives: 04 Denali Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: stockton ca
Posts: 390
|
You might be right. GM might be playing with us a bit and they intent is offering an automatic. Won't know til it comes out.
__________________
![]() But Officer, I swear its just a vacuum leak. Those red things? those are smog pumps! 2004 Sierra Denali ----- 2/4 drop LSX 438 TWIN TURBO LSX Block Video Block number 00370. Build Date 04/17/2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
#431 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
270 more votes to go! Keep em coming!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#432 | |
![]() Drives: -_- !!! Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Bahrain
Posts: 51
|
Quote:
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#433 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 Triple Black ZL1 Vert M6 ECF Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Trenton, Michigan
Posts: 7,046
|
I would opt for the manual, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't offer an automatic.
somebody might actually prefer one. |
|
|
|
|
|
#434 |
![]() Drives: 2010 2ss, 1967 ss427, 1968 327 Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 22
|
I am not against the idea of an automatic. The problem I have with the autos is that they modify the rest of the car so that production is easier and cheaper. Steering wheels that normally would be more ergo are not because they may have to hold paddles. Harness and extra connectors installed in cars and makes a nightmare for diag as you spend more time in the diagrams. The try to combine the two totally different cars so its cheaper to build. Thus ruining the manual cars. Then lets get into the tuning. What else are they going to do on top of the autos. Are they going to put DOD or VVT in the cars. We all know the disaster involved with trying to make more power in the current autos. LET ALONE TRYING TO TUNE IT!!
I currently think the car is amazing looking but dont get the price tag. You want a car that will smoke 90% of the cars out there, in an automatic, that gets better gas mileage and save 20 g's. Come see me on the build. I SAY NO!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| What do all the abbreviations mean? | CrzyGamr2 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 77 | 12-07-2012 04:34 AM |