Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Roto-Fab
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-21-2011, 01:50 PM   #29
Mud
In Mud We Trust
 
Mud's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: 'murica
Posts: 545
You can absolutely get your money back on the extended warranty. If it's wrapped up in the loan, you'll keep paying for it through the life of the loan.

However, you can cancel the warranty and they will give you a prorated refund depending on how long you've had that warranty.

Call the warranty company, cancel the warranty and you will get a prorated refund.

You may have to go through the dealer to start the process, you may not have to. Check it out.
__________________
__________________
2010 2SS/RS, LS3
-Hurst Shifter
-American Racing Torq Thrust/Anthracite
-CAI Intake
Mud is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 01:55 PM   #30
IROCanSS
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 89 IROC 350
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Back roads, southern Ohio
Posts: 12,504
There needs to be a sticky or something on the CEL with mods and a tune and stuff.

Listen folks, you can fool the CEL with spacers or "live with the light" but IT'S NOT SAFE.

Why people insist on saying it is is beyond me. CAN you do it, sure but you run the chance of your car leaning out and going BOOM! Either tune the darn thing or leave it STOCK. So many cake and eat it too-ers. If you make a ton of changes to the car GM has no obligation to warranty it, stop expecting them to.
IROCanSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 02:50 PM   #31
Bad70supreme


 
Bad70supreme's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 aqua blue SS/RS M6
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: plainfield, IL
Posts: 2,706
From the header test thread!


Some interesting tid bits of informations, the A/F ratios were unaffected by the headers or the header size changes, Ranged from 11.7 -12.3 through the pull, the fuel trims also remained constant from size to size.

They have also found that the cars are setup somewhat rich from the factory. This is why so many people are running long tubes without a tune and not having trobble. If you are planning on a cam, why tune twice, if you only want Lts and want to keep your warranty, why tune... no one has posted an engine failer from headers and no tune!
__________________
10.91 at 122 H/C stock block N/A
Bad70supreme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2011, 02:58 PM   #32
c-dub
It's that guy
 
c-dub's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 SIM SS/RS
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Hopewell VA
Posts: 673
to my knowledge though has anybody run the LT's without a tune for more than like 100 miles?
__________________
We mortals are but shadows and dust.
c-dub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2011, 01:46 AM   #33
ArmoSS
 
ArmoSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 506
Quote:
Originally Posted by c-dub View Post
to my knowledge though has anybody run the LT's without a tune for more than like 100 miles?
Good point! Wish an expert and experienced person (on this question) would give more insight on this.

Although...Ted did say there's no point in LT headers and no tune

Last edited by ArmoSS; 04-22-2011 at 01:47 AM. Reason: Revision
ArmoSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2011, 08:40 AM   #34
brantley847
v It bites.
 
brantley847's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 IBM 2SS/RS
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 3,580
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArmoSS View Post
Good point! Wish an expert and experienced person (on this question) would give more insight on this.

Although...Ted did say there's no point in LT headers and no tune
I would like to know this as well, because I have to drive about 90 miles to the tuner I want to use ...

Is there an issue of possibly running too lean for too long? I will be running about 75 of those miles on the highway is the problem...
__________________
2011 2SS/RS
Performance: 439 RWHP: 226/236 Comp Cam, Kooks 1-7/8, CAInc, Borla S type, Vmax TB, Rx Catch Can, Trans cooler, SLP 160 termo, Melling high volume, Eibach Springs/Sways 1" drop, Whiteline complete bushing kit.
brantley847 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2011, 12:11 PM   #35
Tshepp
Show & Go
 
Tshepp's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 Camaro 1SS LS3
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Racine,WI
Posts: 239
Quote:
Originally Posted by c-dub View Post
to my knowledge though has anybody run the LT's without a tune for more than like 100 miles?

I did read one thread while searching about a member who had a couple thousand on without tuning and just had the annoying CEL....
Tshepp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2011, 02:50 PM   #36
walt353
 
Drives: !SS/RS Victory Red
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 158
Totaled a car with an extended warranty. They refunded the balance.
__________________
1SS/RS ,LS3, Volant Intake, VMax TB, Hurst Shifter
walt353 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2011, 03:01 PM   #37
IROCanSS
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 89 IROC 350
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Back roads, southern Ohio
Posts: 12,504
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArmoSS View Post
Good point! Wish an expert and experienced person (on this question) would give more insight on this.

Although...Ted did say there's no point in LT headers and no tune
I believe Ted (who is pretty darn experienced) is talking about if youre adding LTs for performance gains. You have to tune the car to get the full benefit.

...otherwise... and it continues. Like I said... CAN you run the LTs without a tune... yes, you also CAN run your car with out any oil but I sure wouldnt do it.

Yes, the cars are set up with a RANGE for the a/f ratio. Maybe some cars lean out, maybe some dont... every car, every engine is different. When you start blasting that much air through with CAI, LTs, exhaust... the PCM will not supply enough fuel... the O2 sensor reads that its lean and throws the CEL... GET IT!? The car is running lean... Probably not very lean but lean...
IROCanSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2011, 03:16 PM   #38
caverman


 
caverman's Avatar
 
Drives: '69 SS Convertible
Join Date: May 2009
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 7,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by brantley847 View Post
Is there an issue of possibly running too lean for too long? I will be running about 75 of those miles on the highway is the problem...
Is it possible....sure....and if it gets too lean you could burn a piston. From what I've researched though GM made them fairly rich from the factory so you'll probably be okay to drive that distance.

Another option you have is to buy an SCT tuner from Jannetty. He'll give you a tune that will get you real close right off the bat. Then you'll just log some driving, email him the log file, he'll tweak the tune and email it back, then you upload the customized tune to your car. It still might be better to have it dyno tuned but Ted is going to get you really, really close to a dyno tune. Plus side though is that you'll then have a hand held tuner in case you ever need something again (ex: if you add a thermostat you'll need the fans tuned to come on sooner). This will keep you from driving 90 miles again for a 5 min re-tune since Ted could just email you the adjusted tune.

If I didn't live close to a tuner that is what I would do.
__________________
-2010 Camaro 2SS | M6 | VR w/White Stripes | 1 3/4" KOOKS - 3" Magnaflow | LPE 3.91 gears | ADM tuned | Halltech w/ADM Scoop | Spohn/BMR Trailing Arm/Toe Rod | BC Coilovers| Pedders FE4 ZL1 swaybars | Cradle/Diff/Radius Rod bushings | VMax TB | Morimoto Projectors | MGW shifter | Red Calipers
Build Journal
caverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2011, 03:32 PM   #39
caverman


 
caverman's Avatar
 
Drives: '69 SS Convertible
Join Date: May 2009
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 7,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by brantley847 View Post
I don't know for sure...I am not a guru on headers, but I was under the impression the sensors were thrown because of a substantial increase in air flow created by LTs....

Basically, making a header that doesn't throw the sensor completely defeats the purpose of headers....?? Again, I could be wrong..
I'm not a mechanical or header guru either but from my understanding this is what's happening with the CEL.

First understand that a CAT is there to get ride of extra emissions coming from your car in order to make the exhaust cleaner. It does this by heating up the exhaust inside the CAT to an extremely high temp in order to burn up the extra contaminates.

There are two sensors for the CAT....one in front that takes an initial reading of the contaminates going into the CAT and then one just behind it to take the finalized reading. If the rear sensor determines that there is no difference, within a range I'm sure, in the amount of contaminates coming out as what went in then it's going to throw a CEL assuming that the CAT is not funtioning properly.

Now what I don't know is exactly what's throwing the code. Is it because most HF cats only have the rear sensor so the computer is not seeing any change in contaminates? Is it because the HF cats are more free flowing and in order to do that they have to have bigger wholes inside the cat, thus not being able to get as hot and burn up more of the contaminates? Is it because the CAT is further away from the engine than the OEM CATs so it doesn't heat up as much?

Again....no guru here....this is just my understanding of what's going on.
__________________
-2010 Camaro 2SS | M6 | VR w/White Stripes | 1 3/4" KOOKS - 3" Magnaflow | LPE 3.91 gears | ADM tuned | Halltech w/ADM Scoop | Spohn/BMR Trailing Arm/Toe Rod | BC Coilovers| Pedders FE4 ZL1 swaybars | Cradle/Diff/Radius Rod bushings | VMax TB | Morimoto Projectors | MGW shifter | Red Calipers
Build Journal
caverman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2011, 04:20 PM   #40
brantley847
v It bites.
 
brantley847's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 IBM 2SS/RS
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 3,580
Quote:
Originally Posted by caverman View Post
Is it possible....sure....and if it gets too lean you could burn a piston. From what I've researched though GM made them fairly rich from the factory so you'll probably be okay to drive that distance.

Another option you have is to buy an SCT tuner from Jannetty. He'll give you a tune that will get you real close right off the bat. Then you'll just log some driving, email him the log file, he'll tweak the tune and email it back, then you upload the customized tune to your car. It still might be better to have it dyno tuned but Ted is going to get you really, really close to a dyno tune. Plus side though is that you'll then have a hand held tuner in case you ever need something again (ex: if you add a thermostat you'll need the fans tuned to come on sooner). This will keep you from driving 90 miles again for a 5 min re-tune since Ted could just email you the adjusted tune.

If I didn't live close to a tuner that is what I would do.
You were supposed to make me feel better about driving to Tampa....sir, you failed.

lol...I know, I have alot of respect Jannetty, there is a tuner very much like him in Tampa and that is where I was headed and that way I at least get a tuner to get a feel for the car hands on...hmm alright then
__________________
2011 2SS/RS
Performance: 439 RWHP: 226/236 Comp Cam, Kooks 1-7/8, CAInc, Borla S type, Vmax TB, Rx Catch Can, Trans cooler, SLP 160 termo, Melling high volume, Eibach Springs/Sways 1" drop, Whiteline complete bushing kit.
brantley847 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2011, 04:50 PM   #41
Bee
 
Bee's Avatar
 
Drives: SS/RS - Rally Yellow
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Levittown, PA
Posts: 642
I've had LT headers with HF cats on my car for over a year now without a tune. I did do the spacer thing with the rear O2 sensor and have around 5000 miles on it...still no CEL.

Now, do I know that a tune could maximize the gains...you bet. But am I happy with the gains I made without a tune so far...heck yeah!

But I'm also pretty sure that the way most tuners will get around the CEL with LT's is by shutting off the rear O2 sensor. This tells me that the car is not relying solely (if at all) on the difference between the O2 sensors to adjust the A/F ratio.

Anyway, just wanted to share my two cents
__________________
Check out my build here.



SEPA5 South Eastern Pennsylvania 5th Gen Camaro Club
Bee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2011, 04:52 PM   #42
Bad70supreme


 
Bad70supreme's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 aqua blue SS/RS M6
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: plainfield, IL
Posts: 2,706
You will be fine chillout man! A tune is not NEEDED, I have been told this by a few vendors... everyone knows your getting your full bang for the buck, and your car will run better with... but you are not going to blow your engine driving to the tune shop 90miles
__________________
10.91 at 122 H/C stock block N/A
Bad70supreme is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Official 1/4 Mile (V8) 2010+ Camaro Fast List Merc Dragstrip and Launch Techniques Discussion 3656 11-01-2025 02:41 PM
Unofficial 1/4 Mile (V8) 2010+ Camaro Fast List Merc Dragstrip and Launch Techniques Discussion 250 04-01-2014 11:40 AM
Another L99 Dyno tune (with headers and CAI) pcmforless Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 31 02-26-2011 07:36 AM
Manual vs Auto GTAHVIT vs PQ... The video wars. 76z28 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 443 08-26-2010 01:26 PM
LS3 goes 11`s Bonestock! GMRULZ Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 28 12-08-2008 10:10 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.