![]() |
|
|
#3375 |
|
Banned
|
I keep noticing in all these "concept" sketches that the roof line seems low, and the side windows are narrow like the Camaro.
OH THE HORROR!!!! IT WILL HAVE BLINDSPOTS AND BE UNDRIVEABLE!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3376 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
__________________
2015 Corvette Z06.. Lime Rock Park 1:01; Watkins Glen 2:14; Thompson Speedway 1:21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3377 | |
|
COTW: 12/13/10
Drives: 1969 Camaro Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 7,880
|
Quote:
But the Camaro will still probably look better so we shall see.
__________________
"Are you one of those boys who prefer cars to women? - I'm one of those boys that appreciates a fine body, regardless of the make." 1969 CAMARO JOURNAL: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=341239 | FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/taylor.ryan.apt | GRAPHIC DESIGN: www.aptdesigns.net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3378 | |
![]() Drives: f150 Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: san diego
Posts: 281
|
Quote:
like. the only thing we know is that its going to be smaller, lighter and won't have the retro theme, it also won't share the kinetic designing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3379 |
|
Banned
|
I just wonder how long Ford, Chevy and Mopar will be able to keep Mustang, Camaro and Challenger equipped with high HP V8s with increased MPG standards and skyrocketing fuel prices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3380 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: bug Join Date: May 2009
Location: nv
Posts: 1,319
|
Ford will be fine as long as they continue to sell large quantities of small fuel efficient cars to keep their average production mpg where it needs to be. Gas prices should go back down to two bucks a gallon just like they did 2 years ago after it was five bucks gallon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3381 | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3382 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: '11 Mustang GT Premium Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kaiserslauthern, Germany
Posts: 1,268
|
Both Ford and Chevrolet will be introducing the Eco engines into the pony car market again. While this may upset the purist and elitist, those options will ensure the success of the pony car market. Besides, were talking about a 3300-3400lb, 2 door sports coupe with 275-300hp, 280-310ft lbs, $24-26k MSRP and 33-35mpg highway. I would even go as far as ordering a convertible with those numbers...
Our cars could see a 20,000 unit a month sales increase with the offering of a Ecoboost/Ecotech engine. The V8's would still go on to sell 2000-5000 a month just as they do now. I wouldn't worry about the pony car market... It will be fine... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3383 | |
|
Space Shuttle Aficionado
|
Quote:
During this time and age, this is 100% correct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3384 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2019 GT350 Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 3,232
|
Quote:
I sure in hell wouldn't count on that, my guess fuel prices will fall .25 cents or so for the short term then slowly rise back up to $4.00 for the norm. I say bring back the Grand National turbo 6, but this time make it about 550 hp...
__________________
2019 GT350 RR
2013 Boss Mustang 2012 SRT Challenger 392 auto 12:40s 112 stock 2012 Ford Mustang 5.0. Brembo, 3:73s 2010 SS, LS3, Cammed, LTs, 12:20s 2004 Redfire Cobra, Pullied & Tuned 1986 GT, Ed Curtis 347ci, 11:20s motor. 10:30s 100-hp shot Last edited by newmoon; 05-09-2011 at 09:36 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3385 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: '11 Mustang GT Premium Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kaiserslauthern, Germany
Posts: 1,268
|
Quote:
The more I talk about the new Mustang the more pumped I get.... Edit: Looking at the current V6 manual that weighs in at 3401lbs and seeing that the 2005 V6 manual weighed 3350lbs, It is very possible that the 2014 Ecoboost 2.0 SVO Mustang could weigh less than 3300lbs. The Ecoboost 2.0 Inline DOHC turbo weighs about 60lbs less (275lbs ready to run, 350lbs turbo'd *estimated) than the base V6 and I can see a retro fitted Getrag MT82 being paired with the 2.0 as well (reduce cost). I have to double check the engine weights for myself but I am hearing that the Turbo 2.0 weighs 60lbs less than the 3.7 Duratec. That means that a 3150lb SVO Mustang could be possible... fingers crossed... Edit #2: Disregard the 3150 curb weight, It was the old 4.0 liter V6 that was so much heavier than the Ecoboost 2.0 not the current 3.7 Duratec. Still though, there is potential for a 3200 pound SVO Mustang and maybe some change... Sorry about that... Last edited by thePill; 05-09-2011 at 02:29 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3386 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS 6MT Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Westchester, New York
Posts: 3,715
|
Idk about you guys but I cant wait for each next gen car. I strongly prefer the V6 models because overall Im more of a looks and uniqueness guy. Id rather turbo my V6 and have a really unique car then a typical V8 with mods.
When I got my LT a year ago the V6 Mustang was really just too pathetic to consider. Had I been buying now I would have been much more torn. Though the looks of the Camaro trump the Stang IMO the V6 Stang is hands down the better performer. The competition will be fierce for sure, the Camaros strong return means the Stang will have to come out playing hard. I honestly dont know which one I will chose... |
|
|
|
|
|
#3387 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2005 STi corn fed Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,997
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3388 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: '11 Mustang GT Premium Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kaiserslauthern, Germany
Posts: 1,268
|
Quote:
Last edited by thePill; 05-09-2011 at 11:32 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| camaro, camaro vs mustang, cobra, faster, mods, mustang, race |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Poll -- Camaro vs Mustang Supercar Shootout | JusticePete | Suspension / Brakes / Chassis | 105 | 10-09-2013 03:18 PM |
| Does the v6 have enough power? | cstproductions | Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 305 | 08-29-2012 10:27 PM |
| Winner, winner - Jalopnik compares the Big 3 | Number 3 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 31 | 04-17-2011 04:24 PM |
| Im sure this has been asked before.. But forgive my innocence :) | gmag21 | Suspension / Brakes / Chassis | 23 | 02-21-2010 11:29 PM |
| The DEFINITIVE EXPLANATION OF CAMARO SUSPENSION, ISSUES, AND UPGRADES | Info@PeddersUSA.com | Suspension / Brakes / Chassis | 106 | 10-19-2009 07:08 PM |